Effects of Agitation Technique of One-step Self-etch Adhesives on Push-out Bond Strength of Resin Cements in Root Canal

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: Apr 20, 2021

Main Article Content

Untawan Petchmak
Graduate student, Division of Restorative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Thailand
Pavisuth Kanjantra
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Thanapat Sastraruji
Dental Material Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate push-out bond strength of resin cement used with one-step self-etch adhesive systems applied with agitation on the root canal dentin. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth were used in this study. Roots canal were prepared for luting fiber posts and randomly divided into 4 groups of 10 each. Two different resin cements (PanaviaTM V5 and Multilink® N) were used to fix fiber posts in root canal in combination with corresponding adhesives applied passively or with agitation techniques. Twenty-four hours after cementation, each root was sectioned into 6 pieces, each 1 mm. thick, representing cervical, middle, apical regions. Push-out bond strength tests were used to measure regional bond strength. Passive application demonstrated a higher mean bond strength compared with agitation in the groups using PanaviaTM V5. However, no significant differences of the mean bond strength were observed between regional roots in the PanaviaTM V5 groups.  There was no significant difference between the two application techniques when Multilink® N was used. The mean bond strength value was significantly higher in the apical than in the cervical regions in Multilink® N groups regardless of application techniques. In conclusion, Agitation technique used with one-step self-etch adhesive systems could not improve bond strength in root canal

Article Details

How to Cite
Petchmak, U., Kanjantra, P. ., & Sastraruji, T. . (2021). Effects of Agitation Technique of One-step Self-etch Adhesives on Push-out Bond Strength of Resin Cements in Root Canal. Chiang Mai Dental Journal, 42(1), 111–124. Retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmdj/article/view/245358
Issue
Vol. 42 No. 1 (2021): January-April
Section
Original article

References

Silva N, Castro C, Santos-Filho P, Silva GR, Campos RE, Soares PV, et al. Influence of different post design and composition on stress distribution in maxillary central incisor: finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20(2): 153-158.

Rasimick BJ, Wan J, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels. J Prosthodont 2010; 19(8): 639-646.

Naumann M, Koelpin M, Beuer F, Meyer-Lueckel H. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported postendodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study. J Endod 2012; 38(4): 432-435.

Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80(3): 280-301.

Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod 1998; 24(11): 703-708.

Hagge MS, Wong RDM, Lindhemut JS. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation. J Prosthodont 2002; 11(3): 168-175.

Stamatacos C, Simon JF. Cementation of indirect restorations: an overview of resin cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013; 34(1): 42-44.

Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005; 30(5): 627-635.

Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, et al. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater 2008; 24(7): 967-977.

Bitter K, Perdigão J, Exner M, Neumann K, Kielbassa A, Sterzenbach G. Reliability of fiber post bonding to root canal dentin after simulated clinical function in vitro. Oper Dent 2012; 37(4): 397-405.

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27(1): 17-28.

do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Gagler D, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Bond strength and quality of hybrid layer of one-step self-etch adhesives applied with agitation on dentin. Oper Dent 2010; 35(2): 211-219.

Pashley E, Agee K, Pashley D, Tay F. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 2002; 30: 83-90.

Senawongse P, Srihanon A, Muangmingsuk A, Harnirattisai C. Effect of dentine smear layer on the performance of self-etching adhesive systems: a micro-tensile bond strength study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 94(1): 212-221.

Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, et al. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7(2): 133-141.

Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater 2006; 22(6): 533-544.

Bagis B, Turkaslan S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of high frequency ultrasonic agitation on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11(5): 369-374.

Velasquez LM, Sergent RS, Burgess JO, Mercante DE. Effect of placement agitation and placement time on the shear bond strength of 3 self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 2006; 31(4): 426-430.

Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2(2): 83-98.

Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH. Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent 2003; 16(5): 340-346.

Tewari S, Goel A. Effect of placement agitation and drying time on dentin shear bond strength: an in vivo study. Oper Dent 2009; 34(5): 524-530.

Salz U, Zimmermann J, Salzer T. Self-curing, self-etching adhesive cement systems. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7(1): 7-17.

Aung SSMP, Takagaki T, Ko AK, et al. Adhesion durability of dual-cure resin cements and acid-base resistant zone formation on human dentin. Dent Mater 2019; 35(7): 945-952.

Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T, et al. Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Biomater 2011; 7(8): 3187-3195.

Iwai H, Nishiyama N. Effect of calcium salt of functional monomer on bonding performance. J Dent Res 2012; 91(11): 1043-1048.

Rohr N, Fischer J. Tooth surface treatment strategies for adhesive cementation. J Adv Prosthodont 2017; 9(2): 85-91.

Elmarakby AM, Labib AH. Bond strength evaluation of different adhesive systems applied with passive and active manual application mode in endodontically treated teeth (An in-vitro study). J Orthod Endod 2018; 4(8): 1-5.

Gruber YL, Bakaus TE, Gomes OMM, Reis A, Gomes GM. Effect of dentin moisture and application mode of universal adhesives on the adhesion of glass fiber posts to root canal. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19(5): 385-393.

Kuraraydental. PanaviaTM V5 Technical information. [Website]. https://kuraraydental.com/wp-content/uploads/sds/Technical-Information/panavia-v5-technical-information.pdf [cited 2020 March 9].

Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, et al. Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance. Dent Mater 2015; 31(12): 1409-1501.

Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000; 13(5): 255-260.

Gaston BA, West LA, Liewehr FR, Fernandes C, Pashley DH. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001; 27(5): 321-324.

Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117(3): 326-333.

Erdemir U, Mumcu E, Topcu FT, Yildiz E, Yamanel K, Akyol M. Micro push-out bond strengths of 2 fiber post types luted using different adhesive strategies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110(4): 534-544.

Mumcu E, Erdemir U, Topcu FT. Comparison of micro push-out bond strengths of two fiber posts luted using simplified adhesive approaches. Dent Mater J 2010; 29(3): 286-296.

Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Resin tags do not contribute to dentin adhesion in self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10(2): 97-103.

Kenshima S, Reis A, Uceda-Gomez N, et al. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7(2): 117-126.

Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2(2): 99-116.

Ekambaram M, Yiu CKY, Matinlinna JP. Bonding of adhesive resin to intraradicular dentine: a review of the literature. Int J Adhes Dent 2015; 60(4): 92-103.

Gu XH, Mao CY, Liang C, Wang HM, Kern M. Does endodontic post space irrigation affect smear layer removal and bonding effectiveness? Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117(5): 597-603.

Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C. Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive-resin cement system on luting glass-fiber posts into root canals: an SEM investigation. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14(6): 543-549.

Gokce K, Aykor A, Ersoy M, Ozel E, Soyman M. Effect of phosphoric acid etching and self-etching primer application methods on dentinal shear bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10(5): 345-349.

Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Mena-Serrano A, Reis A. Effect of 3-year water storage on the performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively on dentine. J Dent 2011; 39(8): 578-587.