Effects of Bone Types on Bone Remodeling of a Dental Implant: A Review of the Literature
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The bone quantity and quality, which indicate density and strength of bone, are the important factors in dental implant treatment. Bone quality can affect treatment plan concerning implant design, surgical plan, wound healing time, pattern of occlusal force on restoration and classification of patient before implantation. Furthermore, bone augmentation before dental implantation in the unqualified bone area can affect the treatment plan in the meaning of appropriate loading time in each loading protocol.
An article search was proceed using the PubMed database with keywords “type of bone,” “bone density,” “bone quality,” “loading time,” and “bone remodeling”. After that, 48 articles were selected. This literature review compiles basic knowledge on the effect of quality of bone to loading time of dental implant, effects of bone density to dental implant treatment success, bone classification, factors affect bone density in individual, definition of each loading protocol and effects of various type of bone to remodeling process of peri-implant bone.
Article Details
References
Boston DW. Oral implantology. Basics, ITI hollow cylinder system. Implant Dentistry. 1996; 5(4): 303.
Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68(6): 949-956.
Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive boen loading. Int J Oral Implantol 1990; 6(2): 23-31.
Cochran DL. The scientific basis for and clinical experiences with Straumann implants including the ITI Dental Implant System: a consensus report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11(1): 33-58.
Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and future success in the Brånemark® system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3(3): 104-111.
Misch CE. Available bone influences prosthodontic treatment. Dent Today 1988; 7(1): 44-75.
Zarb G, Schmitt A. Implant prosthodontic treatment options for the edentulous patient. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22(8): 661-671.
Inglam S, Suebnukarn S, Tharanon W, Apatananon T, Sitthiseripratip K. Influence of graft quality and marginal bone loss on implants placed in maxillary grafted sinus: a finite element study. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010;48(7): 681-689.
Gallucci GO, Benic GI, Eckert SE, et al. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for implant loading protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 287-290.
Misch C. Bone character: second vital implant criterion. Dent Today. 1988;7(5): 39-40.
Compston J. Bone quality: what is it and how is it measured? Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2006; 50(4): 579-585.
Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991; 62(1): 2-4.
Siegele D, Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4(4): 333-340.
Sahin S, Cehreli MC, Yalçın E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses—a review. J Dent 2002; 30(7-8): 271-282.
Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76(6): 633-640.
Lekholm U, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Patient selection and preparation. Tissue-integrated prosthesis. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc; 1985:199-209.
Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003; 67(8): 932-949.
Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004; 74(1): 3-15.
Appleton RS, Nummikoski PV, Pigno MA, Cronin RJ, Chung KH. A radiographic assessment of progressive loading on bone around single osseointegrated implants in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16(2): 161-167.
Misch C. Early bone loss etiology and its effect on treatment planning. Dent Today. 1996;15(6): 44-51.
Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol 2002; 73(3): 322-333.
Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch-Dietsh FM, Bidez MW. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. Implant Dent 2005; 14(2): 108-116.
Manz MC. Radiographic assessment of peri-implant vertical bone loss: DICRG Interim Report No. 9. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55(12): 62-71.
Misch CE, Bidez MW, Sharawy M. A bioengineered implant for a predetermined bone cellular response to loading forces. a literature review and case report. J Periodontol 2001;72(9): 1276-1286.
Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3(2): 129-134.
Barone A, Covani U, Cornelini R, Gherlone E. Radiographic bone density around immediately loaded oral implants: a case series. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(5): 610-615.
Johns RB, Jemt T, Heath MR, et al. A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7(4): 513-522.
Neugebauer J, Traini T, Thams U, Piattelli A, Zöller JE. Peri‐implant bone organization under immediate loading state. Circularly polarized light analyses: a minipig study. J Periodontol 2006;77(2): 152-160.
Steigenga JT, Al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, Misch CE, Wang HL. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent 2003;12(4): 306-317.
Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6(2): 142-146.
Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest: A three‐dimensional finite‐element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16(4): 486-94.
Chou H-Y, Romanos G, Müftü A, Müftü S. Peri-implant bone remodeling around an extraction socket: predictions of bone maintenance by finite element method. 2012;27(4): 39-48.
Tolstunov L. Implant zones of the jaws: implant location and related success rate. J Oral Implantol 2007;33(4): 211-220.
Van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, et al. The Applicability of Osseointegrated Oral Implants in the Rehabilitation of Partial Edentulism: A Prospective Multicenter Study on 558 Fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5(3): 272-281.
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10(6): 387-416.
Schnitman P, Rubenstein J, Woehrle P, DaSilva J, Koch G. Implants for partial edentulism. Int J Oral Implantol 1988;5(2): 33-35.
Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20(2): 220-230.
Smedberg JI, Nilner K, Rangert B, Svensson S, Glantz PO. On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: a methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7(1): 55-63.
He J, Zhao B, Deng C, Shang D, Zhang C. Assessment of implant cumulative survival rates in sites with different bone density and related prognostic factors: an 8-year retrospective study of 2,684 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30(2): 360-371.
Carter DR, Hayes WC. Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science. 1976;194(4270): 1174-1176.
Rice J, Cowin S, Bowman J. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 1988;21(2): 155-168.
Misch CE, Qu Z, Bidez MW. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57(6): 700-706.
Misch C. Progressive bone loading. Dent Today. 1995;14(1): 80-83.
Elsayed M. Biomechanical Factors That Influence the Bone-Implant-Interface. Res Rep Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;3(1): 1-14.
Uhthoff HK, Jaworski Z. Bone loss in response to long-term immobilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978;60(3): 420-429.
MacMillan HW. Structural characteristics of the alveolar process. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1926; 12(8): 722-732.
Parfitt G. An investigation of the normal variations in alveolar bone trabeculation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1962; 15(12): 1453-1463.
Collaert B, De Bruyn H. Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19(12): 1254-1260.
Fröberg KK, Lindh C, Ericsson I. Immediate Loading of Brånemark System Implants®: a comparison between TiUniteTM and turned implants placed in the anterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006; 8(4): 187-197.
Bogaerde LV, Pedretti G, Dellacasa P, Mozzati M, Rangert B, Wendelhag I. Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles, using Brånemark System® TiUnite™ implants: an 18-month prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6(3): 121-129.
Schärer P, Glauser R, Ruhstaller P, et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark System® TiUnite™ implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 4-year results of a prospective clinical Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7(1): 52-59.
Cosyn J, Vandenbulcke E, Browaeys H, Van Maele G, De Bruyn H. Factors associated with failure of surface-modified implants up to four years of function. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14(3): 347-358.
Eliasson A, Blomqvist F, Wennerberg A, Johansson A. A retrospective analysis of early and delayed loading of full-arch mandibular prostheses using three different implant systems: clinical results with up to 5 years of loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11(2): 134-148.