Rotational path removable partial denture
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The partial edentulous patients require dentures to replace the loss of natural teeth. Rotational path removable partial denture (RPD) is an alternative treatment prosthesis used to achieve the masticatory function and esthetic outcome. The proper design of rotational path RPD affects to adequate retention, minimize the clasp arms, and improve esthetic enhancing compared to conventional RPD. The path of insertion is an importance concept to design the rotational path RPD. The proximal plate represents as the retentive component in rotational path RPD which is an intimate contact to the proximal surface of the tooth abutment at the center of rotation. Then the other components of metal framework rotate in accordance with the rotational path until the removable partial denture framework is seated on tooth and soft tissue. According to the difficult clinical procedures and laboratory processes, dentists and technicians should understand the rotational path RPD designed concept for achieving ideal rotational path RPD.
Article Details
References
Campbell SD, Cooper L, Seymour DW, et al. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118: 273-280.
Bohnenkamp DM. Removable partial dentures: clinical concepts. Dent Clin North Am 2014; 58: 69-89.
Suh JS, Billy EJ. Rotational path removable partial denture (RPD): conservative esthetic treatment option for the edentulous mandibular anterior region: a case report. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20: 98-105.
Davenport JC, Basker RM, Heath JR, Ralph JP, Glantz PO. A system of design. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 586-590.
Bezzon OL, Mattos MGC, Ribeiro RF. Surveying removable partial dentures: the importance of guiding planes and path of insertion for stability. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 412-418.
Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. Rotational path removable partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 370-376.
Jacobson TE. Satisfying esthetic demands with rotational path partial dentures. J Am Dent Assoc 1982; 105: 460-465.
Krol AJ, Finzen FC. Rotational path removable partial dentures: Part 1. Replacement of posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont 1988; 1: 17-27.
Huang CT, Liu FC, Luk KC. Interference factors regarding the path of insertion of rotational-path removable partial dentures. Biomed J 2017; 40: 69-75.
King GE. Dual-path design for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 392-395.
Asher ML. Application of the rotational path design concept to a removable partial denture with a distal-extension base. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 641-643.
Krol AJ, Finzen FC. Rotational path removable partial dentures: Part 2. Replacement of anterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont 1988; 1: 135-142.
Carreiro Ada F, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Santana IL, Vergani CE. Dual path: a concept to improve the esthetic replacement of missing anterior teeth with a removable partial denture. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 586-590.
Jain A, Philip J, Ariga P. Attachment-retained Unilateral Distal Extension (Kennedy’s Class II Modification I) Cast Partial Denture. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2012; 2: 101-107.
Carr AB, Brown DT. Direct Retainers. In: Carr AB, Brown DT, ed: McCracken's Removable Partial Prosthodontics, 12th Edition. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011: 67-95.
Firtell DN, Jacobson TE. Removable partial dentures with rotational paths of insertion: problem analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 8-15.
Jacobson TE. Rotational path partial denture design: a 10-year clinical follow-up-Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 271-277.
Ivanhoe JR. Laboratory considerations in rotational path removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 470-472.
Schwartz RS, Murchison DG. Design variations of the rotational path removable partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 336-338.