Effect of Crown Height Space on Implant-supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis and Implant-retained Overdenture

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: Mar 6, 2020
Keywords:
crown height space implant implant-retained overdenture implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis peri-implant bone strain stress

Main Article Content

Natthaphorn Sirisereephap
Graduate student, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Kullapop Suttiat
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Chaiy Rungsiyakull
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Pimduen Rungsiyakull
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

Abstract

Crown height space is known as vertical cantilever. Complications of dental implants can be occurred when horizontal or oblique forces were applied to dental implants. Such forces can cause stress and strain at peri-implant bone area, and lead to biological and mechanical problems, such as screw loosening, screw fracture, crestal bone resorption, and eventually implant failure. However, there are few studies regarding to crown height space on dental implant prostheses. The aim of this study was to review about crown height space that cause stress and strain to peri-implant bone on implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis and implant-retained overdenture in order to provide a biomechanical sound treatment plan in patients with excessive crown height space.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sirisereephap, N., Suttiat, K., Rungsiyakull, C., & Rungsiyakull, P. (2020). Effect of Crown Height Space on Implant-supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis and Implant-retained Overdenture. Chiang Mai Dental Journal, 41(1), 45–55. Retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmdj/article/view/240667
Issue
Vol. 41 No. 1 (2020): January-April
Section
Review article

References

Olmedo-Gaya MV, Manzano-Moreno FJ, Cañaveral-Cavero E, de Dios Luna-del Castillo J, Vallecillo-Capilla M. Risk factors associated with early implant failure: A 5-year retrospective clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115(2): 150-155.

Manor Y, Oubaid S, Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Nissan J. Characteristics of early versus late implant failure: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67(12): 2649-2652.

Sakka S, Baroudi K, Nassani MZ. Factors associated with early and late failure of dental implants. J Investig Clin Dent 2012; 3(4): 258-261.

Mohajerani H, Roozbayani R, Taherian S, Tabrizi R. The Risk Factors in Early Failure of Dental Implants: a Retrospective Study. J Dent 2017; 18(4): 298-303.

Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. 2th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2015: 233-234.

Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bruxism and dental implant failures: a multilevel mixed effects parametric survival analysis approach. J Oral Rehabil 2016; 43(11): 813-823.

Thymi M, Visscher CM, Yoshida-Kohno E, Crielaard W, Wismeijer D, Lobbezoo F. Associations between sleep bruxism and (peri-) implant complications: a prospective cohort study. BDJ Open 2017; 3: 1-6.

Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, et al. Consensus conference panel report: Crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry—Part 1. Implant Dent 2005; 14(4): 312-321.

Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, et al. Consensus conference panel report: Crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry—Part 2. Implant Dent 2006; 15(2): 113-121.

Zhao X, Qiao SC, Shi JY, Uemura N, Arai K, Lai HC. Evaluation of the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of Straumann® Standard Plus implants supported single crowns placed in non-augmented healed sites in the anterior maxilla: a 5–8 years retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27(1): 106-112.

Gu YX, Shi JY, Zhuang LF, Qiao SC, Xu YY, Lai HC. Esthetic outcome and alterations of soft tissue around single implant crowns: a 2-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26(8): 909-914.

Cheng HC, Peng BY, Chen MS, Huang C-F, Lin Y, Shen YK. Influence of deformation and stress between bone and implant from various bite forces by numerical simulation analysis. Biomed Res Int 2017; 1-7.

Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Gross O, Priel I, Gross M, Chaushu G. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69(7): 1934-1939.

Nissan J, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Priel I, Gross M, Chaushu G. The effect of splinting implant-supported restorations on stress distribution of different crown-implant ratios and crown height spaces. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69(12): 2990-2994.

Verri FR, Batista VE, Santiago Jr JF, Almeida DA, Pellizzer EP. Effect of crown-to-implant ratio on peri-implant stress: a finite element analysis. Mater Sci and Eng: C Mater Biol Appl 2014; 45: 234-240.

Hibbeler R. Mechanics of Materials. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2003: 3-81.

Şahin S, Cehreli MC, Yalçın E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses—a review. J Dent 2002; 30(7-8): 271-282.

Anitua E, Alkhraist MH, Piñas L, Begoña L, Orive G. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extra-short implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29(3): 682-689.

Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) pisa consensus conference. Implant dent 2008; 17(1): 5-15.

Elnayef B, Monje A, Gargallo-Albiol J, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Vertical Ridge Augmentation in the Atrophic Mandible: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017; 32(2): 291-312.

Sakkas A, Schramm A, Winter K, Wilde F. Risk factors for post-operative complications after procedures for autologous bone augmentation from different donor sites. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018; 46(2): 312-322.

Borie E, Orsi IA, de Araujo CP. The influence of the connection, length and diameter of an implant on bone biomechanics. Acta Odontol Scand 2015; 73(5): 321-329.

Chen XY, Zhang CY, Nie EM, Zhang MC. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Implant Dent 2012; 21(4): 340-343.

Kong L, Hu K, Li D, et al. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23(1): 65-74.

Ding X, Liao SH, Zhu XH, Zhang XH, Zhang L. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11(4): 279-287.

Rungsiyakull P, Rungsiyakull C, Appleyard R, Li Q, Swain M, Klineberg I. Loading of a single implant in simulated bone. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24(2): 140-143.

Rungsiyakull C, Rungsiyakull P, Li Q, Li W, Swain M. Effects of occlusal inclination and loading on mandibular bone remodeling: a finite element study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26(3): 527-537.

Ahuja S, Cagna DR. Defining available restorative space for implant overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104(2): 133-136.

Ebadian B, Farzin M, Talebi S, Khodaeian N. Evaluation of stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular overdenture with different vertical restorative spaces: A finite element analysis. Dent Res J 2012; 9(6): 741-747.

Rismanchian M, Dakhilalian M, Bajoghli F, Ghasemi E, Sadr-Eshkevari P. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights. J Oral Implantol 2012; 38(2): 133-139.

Ying Z, Gonda T, Maeda Y. Influence of attachment height and shape on lateral force transmission in implant overdenture treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2017; 30(6): 586-591.

Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, Paek J, Kim HS, Kwon KR. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27(5): 69-76.

Ebadian B, Talebi S, Khodaeian N, Farzin M. Stress analysis of mandibular implant-retained overdenture with independent attachment system: effect of restoration space and attachment height. Gen Dent 2015; 1: 61-67.

Barão VAR, Assunção WG, Tabata LF, de Sousa EA, Rocha EP. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2008; 92(2): 213-223.

Assunção WG, Tabata L, Barao VA, Rocha EP. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35(10): 766-774.

Vafaei F, Khoshhal M, Bayat-Movahed S, et al. Comparative stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular ball-supported and bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 2011; 37(4): 421-429.

Cekiç C, Akça K, Çehreli MC. Effects of attachment design on strains around implants supporting overdentures. Quintessence Int 2007; 38(6): 291-297.

Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Steen WH, Bosman F. Loading conditions of endosseous implants in an edentulous human mandible: A three-dimensional, finite-element study. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23(11): 757-763.

Bevilacqua M, Tealdo T, Menini M, et al. The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105(1) :5-13.

Shackleton JL, Carr L, Slabbert JC, Becker PJ. Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71(1): 23-26.

Sadowsky SJ, Caputo AA. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84(3): 327-334.