The Study of Surface Roughness and Flowability of Distilled Water on a Zirconia Plate After Treated with Various Types of Coupling Agent Solution

Main Article Content

Wannapa Chinadet
Piriya Yavirach
Pisaisit Chaijareenont

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments with various types of coupling agent solution on the surface roughness and flowability of distilled water on a zirconia plate.


Materials and Methods: A total of seventy-five pieces of 10x10x1 mm zirconia plates were divided into 5 groups according to the surface treatments: controlled, silane coupling agent solutions and coupling agent solution containing 10-MDP. The surface roughness (Ra) and wettability analysis were performed on the same specimens of each group. The roughness data and contact angle values were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (α = 0.05).


Results: No statistically significant difference was found among the surface roughness of each group (1.10-1.24 µm). The zirconia plate group treated with coupling agent solution containing 10-MDP demonstrated the statistically significant lowest contact angle values (55.3o+ 1.6), whereas control group showed the statistically significant highest values (80.2o+ 1.3) among the other surface treatments (p < 0.05).


Conclusion: The effect of various types of coupling agent solution in this study have no significant impact on the zirconia surface roughness. As for the flowability, coupling agent solution containing 10-MDP provides the best flowability among all coupling agent solutions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chinadet, W. ., Yavirach, P. ., & Chaijareenont, P. . (2019). The Study of Surface Roughness and Flowability of Distilled Water on a Zirconia Plate After Treated with Various Types of Coupling Agent Solution. Chiang Mai Dental Journal, 40(2), 93–103. Retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmdj/article/view/210558
Section
Original article

References

Murthy V, Manoharan, Balaji, Livingstone D. Effect of four surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramics- a comparative in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8(9): ZC65-ZC68.

Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res 2013; 57(4): 236-261.

Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999; 20(1): 1-25.

Raigrodski AJ. All-ceramic full-coverage restorations: concepts and guidelines for material selection. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005; 17(4): 249-256.

Shenoy A, Shenoy N. Dental ceramics: An update. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13(4): 195-203.

Tabatabaian F. Color in Zirconia-Based Restorations and Related Factors: A Literature Review. J Prosthodont 2018; 27(2): 201-211.

Kupietzky A, Waggoner WE, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27(3): 221-225.

Kupietzky A, Waggoner WF, Galea J. The clinical and radiographic success of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25(6): 577-581.

Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent 2015; 37(2): 163-170.

Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24(5): 511-516.

Holsinger DM, Wells MH, Scarbecz M, Donaldson M. Clinical Evaluation and Parental Satisfaction with Pediatric Zirconia Anterior Crowns. Pediatr Dent 2016; 38(3): 192-197.

Manmontri C, Sirinirund B, Langkapint W, et al. Retrospective Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes and Patient and Parental Satisfaction with Resin Strip Crowns in Primary Incisors. Pediatr Dent 2018; 40(7): 425-432.

Aiem E, Smail-Faugeron V, Muller-Bolla M. Aesthetic preformed paediatric crowns: systematic review. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017; 27(4): 273-82.

Walia T, Salami AA, Bashiri R, Hamoodi OM, Rashid F. A randomised controlled trial of three aesthetic full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2014; 15(2): 113-118.

Özcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17(1): 7-26.

Özcan M, Alkumru HN, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14(4): 335-339.

Sciasci P, Abi-Rached FO, Adabo GL, Baldissara P, Fonseca RG. Effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to Y-TZP ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 113(3): 212-219.

Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007; 23(1): 45-50.

Aboushelib MN. Evaluation of zirconia/resin bond strength and interface quality using a new technique. J Adhes Dent 2011; 13(3): 255-260.

Paranhos MP, Burnett LH, Jr., Magne P. Effect Of Nd:YAG laser and CO2 laser treatment on the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. Quintessence Int 2011; 42(1): 79-89.

Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Borracchini A, Bertelli E. Evaluation of a chemical etching solution for nickel-chromium-beryllium and chromium-cobalt alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62(5): 516-521.

Soares CJ, Soares PV, Pereira JC, Fonseca RB. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17(4): 224-235.

Derand T, Molin M, Kvam K. Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater 2005; 21(12): 1158-1162.

Lung CY, Kukk E, Matinlinna JP. The effect of silica-coating by sol-gel process on resin-zirconia bonding. Dent Mater J 2013; 32(1): 165-172.

Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998; 14(1): 64-71.

Yamaguchi H, Ino S, Hamano N, Okada S, Teranaka T. Examination of bond strength and mechanical properties of Y-TZP zirconia ceramics with different surface modifications. Dent Mater J 2012; 31(3): 472-480.

Banthikhunanon P, Chijareenont P. The flow of distilled water on ceramic plate treated with various types of silane coupling agent solution. CM Dent J 2017; 38(3): 103-110 (in Thai).

Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89(3): 268-274.

Chaijareenont P, Takahashi H, Nishiyama N, Arksornnukit M. Effects of silane coupling agents and solutions of different polarity on PMMA bonding to alumina. Dent Mater J 2012; 31(4): 610-616.

Chen Y, Lu Z, Qian M, et al. Chemical affinity of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate to dental zirconia: Effects of molecular structure and solvents. Dent Mater 2017; 33(12): e415-e427.

Chaijareenont P, Takahashi H, Nishiyama N, Arksornnukit M. Effect of different amounts of 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane on the flexural properties and wear resistance of alumina reinforced PMMA. Dent Mater J 2012; 31(4): 623-628.

Abi-Rached FO, Martins SB, Campos JA, Fonseca RG. Evaluation of roughness, wettability, and morphology of an yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic after different airborne-particle abrasion protocols. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112(6): 1385-1391.

Noro A, Kaneko M, Murata I, Yoshinari M. Influence of surface topography and surface physicochemistry on wettability of zirconia (tetragonal zirconia polycrystal). J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013; 101(2): 355-363.

Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, et al. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2010; 26(5): 426-432.