Effects of Surface Pretreatment on Polyetheretherketone with Sulfuric Acid on Microhardness and Microscopic Morphology
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of surface pretreatment with sulfuric acid at different concentrations on microhardness and microscopic morphology of polyetheretherketone.
Methods: Fourty specimens of Polyetheretherketone (5×5×2 mm3) were embedded in a metal ring diameter 18 mm, height 10 mm with an autopolymerizing acrylic resin. The specimens were polished with P400, P800, P1200 and P2000 grit silicon carbide papers. The specimens were divided into 5 surface retreatment groups (n=8): control group (no surface pretreatment), 70% sulfuric acid, 80% sulfuric acid, 90% sulfuric acid and 98% sulfuric acid, respectively. Sulfuric acid was applied 1 min to each surface. After etching, the specimens were rinsed thoroughly with deionized water and ultrasonically cleaned for 10 min. Subsequently, all specimens were dried at room temperature before Vickers microhardness test and scanning electron microscopy analysis on the surface of specimens. One-way ANOVA following by Tukey’s multiple comparisons were tested (p<0.05).
Results: The group of 98% sulfuric acid pretreatment showed the statistically significantly lowest Vickers microhardness (8.08 Mpa). The group of 70%, 80% and 90% sulfuric acid presented 25.12, 25.62 and 24.58 Mpa, respectively. The pretreatment Polyetheretherketone with 70%, 80% and 90% sulfuric acid showed microscopic morphology of surfaces with increasing pits and pores, respectively. Fiber-like frameworks were distributed throughout the surfaces in the 98% sulfuric acid etching group.
Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that surface pretreatment with 98% sulfuric in 60 s highly corroded of Polyetheretherketone surface, which affected the lowest Vickers microhardness.
Article Details
References
Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 4845-4869.
Kurtz SM. PEEK Biomaterial Handbook. 1th ed. Massachusetts; Elsevier; 2012: 2-4.
Chu XX, Wu ZX, Huang RJ, Zhou Y, Li LF. Mechanical and thermal expansion properties of glass fibers reinforced PEEK composites at cryogenic temperatures. Cryogenics 2010; 50: 84-88.
Celina M, Gillen KT, Malone GM, Clough RL, Nelson Jr WH. Polymer materials and component evaluation in acidic-radiation environments. Radiat Phys Chem 2001; 62: 153-161.
Zhang Z, Breidt C, Chang L, Friedrich K. Wear of PEEK composites related to their mechanical performances. Tribol Int 2004; 37: 271-277.
Almasi D, Izman S, Assadian M, Ghanbari M, Abdul Kadir MR. Crystalline ha coating on peek via chemical deposition. Appl Surf Sci 2014; 314: 1034-1040.
Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR. Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 7-12.
Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2013; 101: 1209-1216.
Costa-Paula S, Torrents-Nicolas J, Brufau de Barbera M, Cabratosa-Termes J. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 680-682.
Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res 2016; 60: 12-19.
Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hämmerle CHF, Fischer J. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 553-559.
Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-durability and influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 357-363.
Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hämmerle CHF. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pre-treatments. Appl Surf Sci 2012; 258: 7213-7218.
Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, et al. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1278-1288.
Sproesser PR, Uhrenbacher J, Eichberger Ma, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Work of adhesion between resin composite cements and PEEK as a function of etching duration with sulfuric acid and its correlation with bond strength values. Int J Adhes 2014; 54: 184-190.
Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B. Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16: 465-472.
Zhou L, Qian Y, Zhu Y, Liu H, Gan K, Guo J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials (DEMA-D-13-00481). Dent Mater J 2014; 30: e209-e215.
Uhrenbacher J, Schmidlin PR, Keul C, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, Starwarczyk B. The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1489-1497.
Kern M, Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Dent Mater 2012; 28: 1280-1283.
Stawarczyk B, Bahr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Janh D, Schmidlin PR. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 163-170.
Wilson A, Jones I, Salamat-Zadeh F, F Watt J. Laser surface modification of poly(etheretherketone) to enhance surface free energy, wettability and adhesion. Inter J Adhes Adhes 2015; 62: 69-77.
Goyal RK, Tiwari AN, Negi YS. Microhardness of PEEK/ceramic micro- and nanocomposites: correlation with Halpin–Tsai model. Mater Sci Eng: A 2008; 491: 230-236.
Koch T, Seidler S. Correlations between indentation hardness and yield stress in thermoplastic polymers. Strain 2009; 45: 26-33.
Fu SY, Feng XQ, Lauke B, Mai YW. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Composites Part B 2008; 39: 933-961.
Goyal RK, Madav VV, Pakankar PR, Butee SP. Fabrication and properties of novel polyetheretherketone/barium titanate composites with low dielectric loss. J Electron Mater 2011; 40: 2240-2247.
Yusof AHM, Amin MAM, Ismail AF, Anam MN, Mahmud NAN. Fabrication and effect of sulfonated poly(etheretherketone) with Cloisite15A nanoclays for microbial fuel cell application. Int J Sust Con Eng Technol 2013; 4: 63-74.
Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F. Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: an overview. Composites Part B 2012; 43: 2883-2892.
Friedrich K, Zhang Z, Schlarb AK. Effects of various fillers on the sliding wear of polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 2005; 65: 2329-2343.
Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16: 383-392.
Silthampitag P, Chaijareenont P, Tattakorn K, Banjongprasert C, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J 2016; 35: 668-674.
Gao S, Gao S, Xu B, Yu H. Effects of different pH-values on the nanomechanical surface properties of PEEK and CFR-PEEK compared to dental resin-based materials. Materials 2015; 8: 4751-4767.
Dandy LO, Oliveux G, Wood J, Jenkins MJ, Leeke GA. Accelerated degradation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composite materials for recycling applications. Polym Degrad Stab 2015; 112: 52-62.
Chemical Resistance Chart EPM, Rosemount, 6021 Innovation Blvd Shakopee, Minnesota 55379, United States.