Effect of Surface Treatments on Micro-shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Doped with Calcium Zirconate

Main Article Content

Tarin Piangsuk
Teerapong Mamanee
Siripong Sirimongkolwattana
Nopawong Luewitunwetchakit

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength between Multilink® N resin cement and hydroxyapatite doped with calcium zirconate ceramic after different methods of surface treatment. Thirty-two cylindrical shaped ceramic specimens,10 millimeters in diameter and 4 millimeters in height, were embedded into metal mold and polished. The specimens were randomly divided into eight groups and received different surface treatment methods. Multilink® N resin cement was then cemented on to each specimen by injecting the cement into polyethylene tubes that were 0.8 millimeter in diameter and 0.5 millimeter in height. There were four resin cements fixed on each specimen and each group had 16 specimens (n=16). All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37˚C for 24 hours. The micro-shear bond strength test was performed. The mode of failure was inspected under stereomicroscope. The results showed that the highest micro-shear bond strength was found in 37% phosphoric acid etching then conditioning with Cesead N Opaque primer group (17.78±2.42 MPa) and 37% phosphoric acid etching group (17.52±1.16 MPa). CojetTM with silane application (15.21±3.33 MPa), sandblasting with Cesead N Opaque Primer conditioning (14.29±2.22 MPa), sandblasting (6.85±1.12 MPa), and Cesead N Opaque Primer conditioning (5.71±2.00 MPa) significantly improved bond strength compared to no treatment group (p<0.05). However, surface treatment with 5% hydrofluoric acid showed similar bond strength (4.97±0.84 MPa) to no treatment group (0.39±0.15 MPa)

Article Details

How to Cite
Piangsuk, T. ., Mamanee, T. ., Sirimongkolwattana, S. ., & Luewitunwetchakit, N. . (2018). Effect of Surface Treatments on Micro-shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Doped with Calcium Zirconate. Chiang Mai Dental Journal, 39(3), 71–80. Retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmdj/article/view/195227
Section
Original article

References

Denry I, Holloway JA. Ceramics for Dental Applications: A review. Materials (Basel, Switzerland)) 2010; 3: 351-368.

Eliaz N, Metoki N. Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics: A review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 2017; 10(4), 334: 1-104.

Baltag I, Watanabe K, Kusakari H, et al. Long-term changes of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53(1): 76-85.

. Hagi TT, Enggist L, Michel D, Ferguson SJ, Liu Y, Hunziker EB. Mechanical insertion properties of calcium-phosphate implant coatings. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 1214-1222.

Oshida Y, Hashem A, Nishihara T, Yapchulay MV. Fractal dimension analysis of mandibular bones: toward a morphological compatibility of implants. Biomed Mater Eng 1994; 4: 397-407.

Xuereb M, Camilleri J, Attard NJ. Systematic review of current dental implant coating materials and novel coating techniques. Int J Prosthodont 2015; 28: 51-59.

Piecuch JF. Augmentation of the atrophic edentulous ridge with porous replamineform hydroxyapatite (Interpore-200). Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30: 291-305.

Saint-Jean SJ. Chapter 12 - Dental Glasses and Glass-ceramics Advanced Ceramics for Dentistry. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2014. p. 255-277.

Avnir D. Molecularly Doped Metals. Acc Chem Res 2014; 47: 579-592.

Avnir D. Recent Progress in the Study of Molecularly Doped Metals. Adv Mater 2018, 12: 1-6.

Zhang L, Verweij H. Homogeneous doping of ceramics by infiltration–gelation. J Eur Ceram Soc 2010; 30: 3035-3039.

Basu B. Toughening of yttria-stabilised tetragonal zirconia ceramics. Int Mater Rev 2005; 50: 239-256.

Sukhum E, Krit S, Wilaiwan L, Teerapong M. Fabrication of advanced ceramics for dental applications (progressive report). National Research Council of Thailand; 2017.

Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 3: 193-204.

Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2014; 30: e147-162.

Ozcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17: 7-26.

Agustin-Panadero R, Roman-Rodriguez JL, Ferreiroa A, Sola-Ruiz MF, Fons-Font A. Zirconia in fixed prosthesis. A literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 2014; 6: e66-73.

Szep S, Gerhardt T, Gockel HW, Ruppel M, Metzeltin D, Heidemann D. In vitro dentinal surface reaction of 9.5% buffered hydrofluoric acid in repair of ceramic restorations: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 668-674.

Loomans BA, Mine A, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Hydrofluoric acid on dentin should be avoided. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 643-649.

Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 454-458.

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28.

Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38: 295-314.

Ellis RW, Latta MA, Westerman GH. Effect of air abrasion and acid etching on sealant retention: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21: 316-319.

Olsen ME, Bishara SE, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Comparison of shear bond strength and surface structure between conventional acid etching and air-abrasion of human enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112: 502-506.

Roeder LB, Berry EA, 3rd, You C, Powers JM. Bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 186-190.

Hannig M, Femerling T. Influence of air-abrasion treatment on the interfacial bond between composite and dentin. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 258-265.

Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Evaluation of five dental silanes on bonding a luting cement onto silica-coated titanium. J Dent 2006; 34: 721-726.

Baena E, Vignolo V, Fuentes MV, Ceballos L. Influence of repair procedure on composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent 2015; 28: 255-260.

Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 9-19.

Hannig C, Hahn P, Thiele PP, Attin T. Influence of different repair procedures on bond strength of adhesive filling materials to etched enamel in vitro. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 800-807.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235.

Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, et al. Adhesion to and decalcification of hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 1565-1569.

Torres CR, Zanatta RF, Silva TJ, Huhtala MF, Borges AB. Influence of previous acid etching on bond strength of universal adhesives to enamel and dentin. Gen Dent 2017; 65: e17-e21.