Price Points That Effect on Purchase of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Secondary School Students

Main Article Content

Areerat Nirunsittirat
Danupong Chaiariyakul
Thirachaiwat Pantkul
Nathaset Tongkitcharoen
Chamnanvit Supagalap
Keerati Wiriyangkura
Thanapon Wichittrakankul
Pinpinut Wanichsaithong

Abstract

This study aimed to survey opinion and decision making for the price point that effect on purchase of sugar-sweetened beverages in secondary school students. The price difference was calculated from the difference between maximum affordable price and current retail market price. The study was conducted in secondary school students in Muang, Chiang Mai. From 32,608 students, 680 were recruited in this study using stratified random sampling by school type and school size. Structured questionnaire was administered. To increase validity, SSBs were also displayed to show their brand, size and packaging. Results yielded a 95.3% response rate, with 648 students. The mean age was 14.80+1.52 years. In one week, 60.4% were paid at least 500 bahts for expenses from guardian, 112 bahts (15.11 bahts/day) was spent on SSBs. The 34.6% of students consumed SSBs 5 times/week or more and 17.6% consumed SSBs everyday. From all 104 displayed SSBs, the students decided not to buy SSBs when the price increased in range from 1.18-3.29 baht. In all SSBs including in this study, the price points that effect on purchase of SSB is over 3 bahts. Retail price is a key factor for the decision making.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nirunsittirat, A. ., Chaiariyakul, D. ., Pantkul, T. ., Tongkitcharoen, N. ., Supagalap, C. ., Wiriyangkura, K. ., Wichittrakankul, T. ., & Wanichsaithong, P. . (2019). Price Points That Effect on Purchase of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Secondary School Students. Chiang Mai Dental Journal, 40(1), 113–126. Retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cmdj/article/view/192639
Section
Original article

References

Ismail AI, Tanzer JM, Dingle JL. Current trends of sugar consumption in developing societies. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997; 25(6): 438-43.

Skinner J, Byan R, Blinkhorn A, Johnson G. Sugary dringk consumption and dental caries in New South Wales teenagers. Aust Dent J. 2015; 60(2): 169-75.

Bernabe E, Vehkalahti MM, Sheiham A, Aromaa A, Suominen AL. Sugar-sweetened beverages and dental caries in adults: a 4-year prospective study. J Dent. 2014: 42(8); 952-58.

Luengpainsamut J, Chatrchaiwiwatana S, Muktabhant B, Inthalohit W. Relationship between dental caries status, nutritional status, snack foods, and sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among primary schoolchildren grade 4-6 in Nongbua Khamsaen school, Na Klang district, Nongbua Lampoo Province, Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012; 95(8): 1090-97.

Keller A, Bucher DTS. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Obesity among Children and Adolescents: A Review of Systematic Literature Reviews. Child Obes. 2015; 11 (4): 338-46.

Lim L, Banwell C, Bain C, et al. Sugar sweetened beverages and weight gain over 4 years in a Thai national cohort--a prospective analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (5): e95309.

Thammarangsri T. Situations of NCDs; Health Problem, Societal crisis. Nonthaburi: International Health Policy Program, 2014.

Euerautthakaroon S, Rityu A, Junbang P. The consumption of snack and drinks, oral hygiene care and oral health status of youth in high school. Nonthaburi. 2013.

Prasertsom P. Sugar: Sweetness in snack, drinks, milk, and baby formula. Nonthaburi: Departrment of Health, Ministry of Public Health 2007.

World Health Organization. 2008-2013 Action plan for the global strategy for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: WHO Document Production Service, 2008.

Nakhimovsky SS, Feigl AB, Avila C, O'Sullivan G, Macgregor-Skinner E, Spranca M. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce overweight and obesity in middle-income countries: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (9): e0163358.

Sowa PM, Keller E, Stormon N, Lalloo R, Ford PJ. The impact of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax on oral health and costs of dental care in Australia. Eur J Public Health. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky087

Briggs ADM, Mytton OT, Kehlbacher A, Tiffin RElhussein ARayner MJebb SA.Blakely T, Scarborough P. Health impact assessment of the UK soft drink industry levy: conparative risk assessment modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2017; 1(1): e15-e22.

Schwendicke F, Thomson WM, Broadbent JM, Stolpe M. Effects of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Caries and Treatment Costs. J Dent Res. 2016; 95(12): 1327-32.

Welsh JA, Lundeen EA, Stein AD. The sugar-sweetened beverage wars: public health and the role of the beverage industry. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013; 20 (5) :401-6.

Cabrera Escobar MA, Veerman JL, Tollman SM, Bertram MY, Hofman KJ. Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 1072-82.

Briggs AD, Mytton OT, Madden D, O'Shea D, Rayner M, Scarborough P. The potential impact on obesity of a 10% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Ireland, an effect assessment modelling study. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 860-9.

Waterlander WE, Ni Mhurchu C, Steenhuis IH. Effects of a price increase on purchases of sugar sweetened beverages. Results from a randomized controlled trial. Appetite. 2014; 78: 32-9.

Basu S, Vellakkal S, Agrawal S, Stuckler D, Popkin B, Ebrahim S. Averting obesity and type 2 diabetes in India through sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: an economic-epidemiologic modeling study. PLoS Med. 2014; 11 (1): e1001582.

Jou J, Techakehakij W. International application of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation in obesity reduction: factors that may influence policy effectiveness in country-specific contexts. Health Policy. 2012; 107 (1): 83-90.

Thai. Excise Tax Act 2017. (March 18, 2017)

Thai. Ministerial Regulation of Excise Tax Rate 2017. (October 31, 2017)

Ministry of Public Health. The evaluation of excise tax levying for drinks policy. The meeting on excise tax levying for drinks Aug 7, 2014; Meeting room at International Health Policy Program Foundation. Bangkok. 2014.

ThaiPublica. Cigarette, Alcoholic drink, Beer; price after updating of tax policy. Available at https://thaipublica.org/2017/09/alcohol-and-tobacco-tax-restructuring-16-9-2560/, accessed October 17, 2017.

The House of the Oireachtas Library & Research Service . A tax on sugar sweetened drinks: an overview overview. Available at https://www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/media/housesoftheoireachtas/libraryresearch/lrsnotes/LRS_Notesugary_drinks_tax_051016_160103.pdf, accessed March 10, 2016.

Laura C, Angela C. Health-related taxed on food and beverages. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7ab8/55d141eaa19e7e556a38a48a53c828304418.pdf, accessed March 10, 2018

Food and Nutrition Policy for Health Promotion, International Health Policy Program Foundation, Thai NCD Alliance. Proceedings of the conference on Economic tools for health promotion on sugar-sweetened beverages; Gain or loss?. June 29, 2016; Amari Don Muang Airport. Bangkok. 2016.

Caro JC, Corvalan C, Reyes M, Silva A, Papkin B, Taillie LS. Chile’s 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and perchases of sugar-sweetened beverages. An observational study in urban environment. PLoS Med. 2014; 15(7): e1002597

Department of Health Working Paper, Ireland. Introducing a Tax on Sugar Sweetened Drinks: Helath Rationale, Options and Recommendations. Available at http://health.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/INTRODUCING-A-TAX-ON-SUGAR-SWEETENED-DRINKS-FINA.pdf, accessed March 10, 2016.

Ecorys. Food taxed and their impact on competitiveness in the agri-food sector. Rotterdam: The European Compettitiveness and Sustainable Industrial Policy Consortium, 2014.

Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM, Rojas N, McCulloch CE, Madsen KA. Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption. Am J Public Health. 2016; 106(10): 1865-71.

Food and Nutrition Policy for Health Promotion. Tax policy and price for encouraring good consumption behavior. Healthy Food, Healthy Life. 2014;3 (2):1-16.