Development and Use of the Thai Version of the Dental Impact Profile to Assess Thai Older Adults under Royal Dental Prosthesis Project
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Older adults who use dentures under the Royal Denture Prosthesis Project have different behaviors of denture wearing. However, the impact on quality of life, or factors associated with the impact of dentures on quality of life has never been assessed. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Dental Impact Profile, and then to use the tool to assess the impact of dentures on quality of life and to explore the factors associated with the impact of dentures on various aspects of quality of life. Data were collected among 215 Thai older adults who received dentures in Pak Chom District, Loei Province by interview and oral health examination. The results of the development and testing of the validity and reliability demonstrated that The Thai version of the Dental Impact Profile had a content validity index of 0.96. For a construct validity, it was found that all items had good structural integrity (P<0.05), except for the kissing question (P=0.083). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for determining the internal consistency was 0.970. The results of using the developed assessment revealed that the dentures had the greatest proportion of good effect on smiling and laughing (78.1%), the greatest proportion of bad effect on chewing and biting (29.7%), and the greatest proportion of no effect on kissing (47.6%). Educational level, monthly income, personality traits, having a pair of natural teeth, and type of the current dentures were associated with the impact of dentures on some dimensions of quality of life (P<0.05). Denture wearing was associated with the impact of dentures on all dimensions of quality of life (P<0.001). This result of the study indicated that the Thai Version of the Dental Impact Profile is a good validity and reliability that can be applied to the Thai population. The tool was able to explain the different effect of denture on various dimensions of quality of life and the demographic factors were associated with the impact of dentures on quality of life.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการลงตีพิมพ์ในวิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์เฉพาะของคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใด ๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร จากคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นก่อนเท่านั้น
References
World Health Organization. A review of current recommendations for the organization and administration of community oral health services in Northern and Western Europe: report on a WHO workshop: Oslo, 24-28 May 1982. 1983.
Bureau of Dental Health, Ministry of Public Health. The 8th National Oral Health Report 2017. Nonthaburi: Bureau of Dental Health, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health; 2018.330.
Dental Health Innovation Technology Development Group for Working Age and Elderly. Oral health promotion for the elderly in the Royal Denture Project and the promotion of oral health for the elderly in honor of His Majesty the King 2012: Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health; 2012 [cited 2563 March 19th2020]. Available from: http://dental.Anamai. moph.go.th/elderly/elderly55.php.
Dalodom S, Veerachai N, Vejvithi V, Jiaramaneechotchai S. Evaluation of the Royal Denture Project in Honor of His Majesty the King Due to the opportunity to celebrate the birthday of December 5th, 2007. Th Dent PH J 2008; 13(5):71-84.
Detpithak A. Evaluation of the Royal Denture Project Chiang Mai province between the year 2005-2013. Th Dent PH J 2015;20(1):60-8.
Srinawarat P, Richuwararak. P. Follow-up for the treatment of patients wearing full dentures: 3-5 years after treatment. M Dent J 1997;17:61-8.
Sribuathong S. Five Year Follow-up on Complete Dentures Used Under “Royal Dental Prosthesis Project”: A Case Study Among Elderly at Nakhonpathom Hospital. Reg 4-5 Med J 2015; 34(1):80-91.
Theeranuluk B. A Follow up Study among Elderly Complete Denture Wearers under Royal Dental Prosthesis Project Phutthamonthon Hospital, Nakhon Pathom Province: 3-5 Years after Treatment. Reg 4-5 Med J 2018;37(1):22-32.
Nakmanee S. Quality of oral health-related quality of life among elderly complete denture wearers at bangpakong hospital. J Prapokklao Hosp Clin Med Educ Cent 2018;35(1):40-9.
Chaiphotchanaphong N, Tumrasvin W, Krisdapong S, editors. Thai version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (Thai-OHIP) in Thai dental patients. The 23rd National Graduate Research Conference Rajamangala University of Technology Isan; 2011: Citeseer.
Adulyanon S, Sheiham A. Oral impacts on daily performances. Measuring oral health quality of life. 1997;151:160.
Slade GD. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill. 1997;3.
Strauss RP, Hunt RJ. Understanding the value of teeth to older adults: influences on the quality of life. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124(1):105-10.
Macentee MI, Hole R, Stolar E. The significance of the mouth in old age. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45(9):1449-58.
Trulsson U, Engstrand P, Berggren U, Nannmark U, Brånemark PI. Edentulousness and oral rehabilitation: experiences from the patients' perspective. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110(6):417-24.
Smith PA, Entwistle VA, Nuttall N. Patients’ experiences with partial dentures: a qualitative study. Gerodontology 2005;22(4):187-92.
Tuongratanaphan S, Chokwattanapornchai N, Marasri P, Pattranukukit P, Pak-insee Y, Piworn W, et al. A Retrospective Study on Usage of Removable Partial Dentures by Patients in Comprehensive Dental Clinic. CM Dent J 2016;37(2):123-33.
Peršić S, Čelebić A. Influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on oral health-related quality of life, orofacial esthetics and chewing function based on patient-reported outcomes. Qual Life Res 2015;24(4): 919-26.
Viechtbauer W, Smits L, Kotz D, Budé L, Spigt M, Serroyen J, et al. A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68(11):1375-9.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25(24):3186-91.
Yaghmaie F. Content validity and its estimation. J Med Edu 2009;3(1):870.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(1):34-42.
Rorer LG. The great response-style myth. Psychol Bull 1965;63(3):129.
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15(2): 155-63.
Jung CG. Psychologische typen: Rascher; 1921.
Åstrøm AN, Okullo I. Validity and reliability of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) frequency scale: a cross-sectional study of adolescents in Uganda. BMC Oral health 2003;3(1):1-9.
El Osta N, Tubert-Jeannin S, Hennequin M, Naaman NBA, El Osta L, Geahchan N. Comparison of the OHIP-14 and GOHAI as measures of oral health among elderly in Lebanon. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012;10(1):1-10.
Yamazaki M, Inukai M, Baba K, John M. Japanese version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP‐J). J Oral Rehabil 2007;34(3):159-68.
Dictionary CE. Collins english dictionary. Complete Unabridged 2014.
Field A. Exploratory factor analysis. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2005:619-80.
Goodwin R. Personal relationships across cultures: Routledge; 2013.
Somsiri N. Oral Health Related to Quality of Life after Complete Denture Delivered among Elderly. Journal of Health Education 2015;38(1): 1-13.
Malta S, Farquharson K. The initiation and progression of late-life romantic relationships. Journal of Sociology 2012;50(3):237-51.
Sirithepmontree D. Oral health related to quality of life among the elderly population after prosthesis of the Royal Denture Program. Vajira Medical Journal: Journal of Urban Medicine. 2008:39-47.
Mosharraf R, Aghaee A, Hasan Zadeh A, Poor Agha Koockak M. Relationship between satisfaction and expectation with self-esteem and self-concept in patients using complete denture. Journal of Dentistry. 2007;8(3):60-70.
Robins RW, Hendin HM, Trzesniewski KH. Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality social psychology bulletin. 2001;27(2):151-61.
Suntaphun P. Elderly Depression: Nursing Role. UMT Poly Journal 2020;17(1).
Singh BP, Pradhan KN, Tripathi A, Tua R, Tripathi S. Effect of sociodemographic variables on complete denture satisfaction. jap. 2012;4(1):43-51.
Lee GR, Yoo WK. A study on denture satisfaction in rural elderly people. J Agri Med & Community Health 2010;35(1):56-66.
Van Waas MA. The influence of psychologic factors on patient satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63(5):545-8.
Özdemir AK, Özdemir HD, Polat NT, Turgut M, Sezer H. The effect of personality type on denture satisfaction. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19(4):364-70.
Fenlon MR, Sherriff M, Newton JT. The influence of personality on patients’ satisfaction with existing and new complete dentures. J Dent 2007;35(9):744-8.
Fontijn-Tekamp F, Slagter A, Van Der Bilt A, Van'T Hof M, Witter D, Kalk W, et al. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent Res 2000;79(7):1519-24.
Brennan DS, Spencer AJ, Roberts-Thomson KF. Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life. Qual Life Res 2008;17(2):227-35.
Čelebić A, Knezović-Zlatarić D. A comparison of patient's satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. Journal of dentistry. 2003;31(7):445-51.
Yoshizumi DT. An evaluation of factors pertinent to the success of complete denture service. J Prosthet Dent 1964;14(5):866-78.