Effect of Repair Time Intervals and Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Bisacryl Resin Material Repairing with Flowable Composite Resin

Main Article Content

Umaporn Vimonkittipong
Jirat Srihatajati

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate different repair time intervals by means of thermocycling and different surface treatments on shear bond strength of bisacryl resin material repairing with flowable resin composite. A total of 270 bisacryl resin specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 90), categorized by the numbers of thermocycling: (1) no cycle (stored in artificial saliva at 37 oC for 1 h), (2) 194 cycles (equivalent to 1 week in mouth) and (3) 5,000 cycles (equivalent to 6 months in mouth). After aging, the specimens in each group were subdivided into 3 subgroups (n = 30), categorized by the methods of surface treatment (no treatment, cylindrical carbide bur, cylindrical carbide bur and AdperTM Single Bond 2). The flowable composite resin (5 mm diameter, 4 mm height) was bonded to all surfaces of bisacryl resin specimens. Specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test by a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed by Two-way ANOVA and Turkey’s test (α= 0.05). Mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope. The highest mean shear bond strength was acquired from the carbide cylindrical bur and AdperTM Single Bond 2 group, whereas the no treatment group exhibited the lowest mean bond strength in all time intervals of repair. Besides, the result revealed that shear bond strength values were decreased when the number of thermocycling cycles increased, making the 5,000 cycle specimens had the lowest shear bond strength. Adhesive failure was the most predominant mode of failure. In conclusion, repair time intervals and surface treatments affect to the shear bond strength of bisacryl resin material repairing with flowable composite resin.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Vimonkittipong U, Srihatajati J. Effect of Repair Time Intervals and Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Bisacryl Resin Material Repairing with Flowable Composite Resin. Khon Kaen Dent J [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 11 [cited 2022 Oct. 5];25(2):71-8. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KDJ/article/view/248910
Section
Research Articles
Share |

References

Higginbottom FL. Quality provisional restorations: a must for successful restorative dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995;16(5):442-44.

Wang RL, Moore BK, Goodacre CJ, Swartz ML, Andres CJ. A comparison of resins for fabricating provisional fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2(2):173-84.

Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(2):129-32.

Tjan AH, Castelnuovo J, Shiotsu G. Marginal fidelity of crowns fabricated from six proprietary provisional materials. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77(5): 482-5.

Fleisch L, Cleaton-Jones P, Forbes M, Van J, Fat C. Pulpal response to a bis-acryl-plastic (Protemp®) temporary crown and bridge material. J Oral Patho 1984;13(6):622-31.

Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90(5):474-97.

Karaokutan I, Sayin G, Kara O. In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7(1):27-31.

Fox CW, Abrams BL, Doukoudakis A. Provisional restorations for altered occlusions. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52(4):567-72.

Vahidi F. The provisional restoration. Dent Clin North Am 1987;31(3):363-81.

Lowe RA. The art and science of provisionalization. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1987;7(3):64-73.

Patras M, Naka O, Doukoudakis S, Pissiotis A. Management of provisional restorations' deficiencies: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012; 24(1):26-38.

Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Jones AG. Shear bond strength of bis-acryl composite provisional material repaired with flowable composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14(1):47-52.

Chen H L, Lai YL, Chou IC, Hu CJ, Lee SY. Shear bond strength of provisional restoration materials repaired with light-cured resins. Oper Dent 2008; 33(5):508-15.

Da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent 2012;40(6): 513-21.

Koumjian JH, Nimmo. A. Evaluation of fracture resistance of resins used for provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64(6):654-657.

Shim J, Park Y, Manaloto A, Shin S, Lee J, Choi Y, Ryu J. Shear bond strength of four different repair materials applied to bis-acryl resin provisional materials measured 10 minutes, one hour, and two days after bonding. Oper Dent 2014;39(4): 147-53.

Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Pulido T, Johnston WM. Relative fracture toughness of bis-acryl interim resin materils. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106(2):118-25.

Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27(2):89-99

Neeranuch K, Sitthikorn K. Effect of surface treatment methods on microtensile bond strength of aged resin composite repair. CM Dent J 2018;40(2):65-80.

Junior S.AR, Ferracane JL, Della Bona Á. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009;25(4):442-51.

Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite–composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investing. 2009; 13(3):317-23.

Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, de Boer T, Pesschier D, Bronkhorst E. Void and porosities in class I microreparations filled with various resin composites. Oper Dent 2003;28(1):9-14.

da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent 2012;40(6):513-21.

Turner CQ, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1993;18(5):187-94.

Oztas N, Alacam A, Bardakcy Y. The effect of air abrasion with two new bonding agents on composite repair. Oper Dent 2003;28(2):149-54.

Nassoohi N, Kazemi H, Sadaghiani M, Mansouri M, Rakhshan V. Effects of three surface conditioning techniques on repair bond strength of nanohybrid and nanofilled composites. Dent Res J 2015;12(6): 554-61.

Talal A, Mohannad A, Fahad A, Mahmound S, Ahmad M. Shear bond strength of bis-acryl resin provisional material repaired using a flowable composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14(1):47-52.

Gregory WA, Pounder B, Bakus E. Bond strengths of chemically dissimilar repaired composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64(6):664-68

Umaporn V, Apittita T, Kitinun T, Rus-ake T, Waritta V, Chanyanut W. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of Bis-acryl resin provisional restoration and self-curing acrylic resin. J Dent Assoc Thai 2018;68(4):370-80.

Soderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99(2):173-180.

Papacchini F, Toledano M, Monticelli F, Osorio R, Radovic I, Polimeni A. Hydrolytic stability of composite repair bond. Eur Oral Sci 2007;115(5): 417-24.

Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119(4):316–22.

Papacchini F, Magni EI, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticellia F, Goracci C. Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Oper Dent 2007;32(4): 363-71.

SR Ha, SH Kim, JB Lee, JS Han, IS Yeo. Improving shear bond strength of temporary crown and fixed dental prosthesis resins by surface treatments. J Mater Sci 2016;51:1463-75.

Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 1998;26(8):685-94

Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Lenarda R, De Stefano E. Dental adhesion review: aging nd stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008;24(1):90-101.

Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative microfine hybrid resin composite. J Dent 1997;77(2):122-26.

Hisamatsu N, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Effect of silane primers and unfilled resin bonding agens on repair bond strength of a prosthodontics microfilled composite, J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(7): 644-48.

ISO 11405. Dental materials-guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva; Switzerland: International Standard Organization (ISO); 2014.

Amaral FLB, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SAM. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19(6):340-53.

Catalbas B, Uysal T, Nur M, Demir A, Gunduz B. Effects of thermocycling on the degree of cure of two linual retainer composites, Dent Mater J 2010;29(1):41-6.

Brendeke J, Özcan M. Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(4): 399-406.

Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF. Effect of thermocycling on the shear bond strength of a cyanoacrylate orthodontic adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123(1):21¬-4.

El-Araby A M, Talic YF. The effect of thermocycling on the adhesion of self-etching adhesives on dental enamel and dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8(2):17-24.

Koyuturk AE, Kusgoz A, Ulker M, Yesilyurt C. Effects of mechanical and thermal aging on microleakage of different fissure sealants. Dent Mater 2008;27(6):795-801.

Jafarzadeh TS, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei FS. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper Dent 2011;36(6):608-17.

Consani RL, Marinho T, Bacchi A, Caldas RA, Feitosa VP, Pfeifer CS. Repair strength in simulated restorations of methacrylate - or silorane - bsed composite resins. Braz Dent J 2016;27(4):463-67.

Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composites in water-effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/ matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;42(3):465-72.

Lee JK, Choi JY, Lim BS, Lee YK, Sakaguchi RL. Change of properties during storage of a UDMA/TEGDMA dental resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;68(2):216-21.

Tarumi H, Imazato S, Ehara A, Kato, Edi N, Ebisu S. Post irradiation polymerization of composites containing bis-GMA and TEGDMA. Dent Mater 1999;15(4):238-42.