Effect of Saliva Contaminated and Re-Etching Time to Shear Bond Strength of Hydrophilic Sealant: An In Vitro Study

Main Article Content

Salinthip Phakthawat
Porntip Phajongviriyatorn
Kemporn Kitsahawong
Anoma Rattanacharoenthum


The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of different saliva-contaminated (C) and re-etching time (E) on the shear bond strength of hydrophilic sealant. One hundred and eighty extracted premolars were randomly divided into 9 groups (N=20) including Group 1 – noncontaminated enamel and sealant applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Co), Group 2 (C5) : saliva contamination at 5 seconds , Group 3 (C5+E5): saliva contamination at 5 seconds and re-etching time at 5 seconds  , Group 4 (C5+E15), Group 5 (C5+E20), Group 6 (C30), Group 7 (C30+E5), Group 8 (C30+E15) and Group 9 (C30+E20). The sealant was bonded on all specimens, then they were thermocycled for 5,000 cycles between 5°c and 55°c. The shear bond strength was tested by a universal testing machine. The result of this study revealed that group 1 showed a significantly higher shear bond strength than those the saliva-contaminated groups (group 2, 6) (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between group 2 – 5 (p>0.05). On the other hand, within-group 6 – 9, Group 6 was significantly lower than group 8 (p<0.05). It could be concluded that salivary contamination undermined (weaken) the adhesion of the hydrophilic sealant to enamel and consequently reduced bond strength. Re-etching was applied to pit and fissure, resulting in significantly higher strength values of shear bond. Therefore, Re-etching on saliva-contaminated pit and fissure should be done to provide the best adhesion.

Article Details

How to Cite
Phakthawat S, Phajongviriyatorn P, Kitsahawong K, Rattanacharoenthum A. Effect of Saliva Contaminated and Re-Etching Time to Shear Bond Strength of Hydrophilic Sealant: An In Vitro Study. Khon Kaen Dent J [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 28 [cited 2024 Jun. 15];24(1):15-27. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KDJ/article/view/244097
Research Articles
Share |


Mouradian WE. The face of a child: children’s oral health and dental education. J Dent Educ 2001;65(9): 821-31.

Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcenes W. Global Burden of Untreated Caries. J Dent Res 2015;94(5):650-8.

Dental Health Division, Department of Health M of PH. The 8th National Oral Health Survey in Thailand. 1st ed. Nonthaburi: Dental Health Division, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health; 2017.

Condo R, Cioffi A, Riccio A, Totino M, Condo SG, Cerroni L. Sealants in dentistry: A systematic review of the literature. Oral Implantol 2013;6(3):67-74.

Muñoz HE, Silva JC. Pit and fissure sealants:an overview. RDH 2013;95-100.

Beauchamp J, Caufield PW, Crall JJ, Donly K, Feigal R, Gooch B, et al. Evidence-based clinical recommen-dations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the american dental association council on scientific affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(3):257-68.

National Institutes of Health. Consensus development conference statement on dental sealants in the prevention of tooth decay. National Institutes of Health. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;108(2):233-6.

ADA Council on Access, Prevention and inter professional relations; ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. Dental sealants. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128(4): 485-8.

Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122(10): 34-42.

Haznedaroglu E, Guner S, Duman C, Mentes A. A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant. Dent Mater J 2016;35(3):532-8.

Raadal M, Espelid I, Mejare I. The caries lesion and its management in children and adolescents. In: Koch G, Poulsen S, Espelid I, Haubek D. Pediatric Dentistry-A Clinical Approach.1st ed. Copenhagen:Munksgaard; 2001: 173–212.

Feigal RJ. The use of pit and fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent 2002;24(5):415-22.

Waggoner WF, Siegal M. Pit and fissure sealant application: Updating the technique. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127(3):351-61.

Kühnisch J, Mansmann U, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Hickel R. Longevity of materials for pit and fissure sealing- results from a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2012;28(3): 298-303.

Wright JT, Tampi MP, Graham L, Estrich C, Crall JJ, Fontana M, et al. Sealants for preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials - A report of the American dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2016;147(8):631-45.

Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A. A study of enamel adhesives. The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol 1967;12(12):1615-20.

Baygin O, Korkmaz FM, Tüzüner T, Tanriver M. The effect of different enamel surface treatments on the microleakage of fissure sealants. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27(1):153-60.

Asselin ME, Sitbon Y, Fortin D, Abelardo L, Rompre PH. Bond strength of a sealant to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols. Pediatr Dent 2009; 31(4):323-8.

Hitt JC, Feigal RJ. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 1992;14(1):41-6.

Thomson JL, Main C, Gillespie FC, Stephen KW. The effect of salivary contamination on fissure sealant--enamel bond strength. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8(1):11-8.

Hebling J, Feigal RJ. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel. Am J Dent 2000;13(4):187-91.

Borem LM, Feigal RJ. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital-image analysis evaluation. Quintessence Int 1994;25(4):283-9.

Khogli AE, Cauwels R, Vercruysse C, Verbeeck R, Martens L. Microleakage and penetration of a hydrophilic sealant and a conventional resin-based sealant as a function of preparation techniques: A laboratory study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2013;23(1):13-22.

Güçlü ZA, Dönmez N, Hurt AP, Coleman NJ. Characterisation and microleakage of a new hydrophilic fisusre sealant-UltraSeal XT® hydroTM. J Appl Oral Sci 2016;24(4):344-51.

Silverstone LM, Hicks MJ, Featherstone MJ. Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: an SEM study. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;110(3):329-32.

Panigrahi A, Srilatha KT, Panigrahi RG, Mohanty S, Bhuyan SK, Bardhan D. Microtensile bond strength of embrace wetbond hydrophilic sealant in different moisture contamination : an in-vitro study. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2015;9(7):23-5.

Correr GM, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Alonso RCB, Puppin-Rontani RM, Sinhoreti MAC, Correr-Sobrinho L. Effect of saiva-contamination and re-etching time on shear bond strength of a pit and fissure sealant. J Appl Oral Sci 2004;12(3):200-4.

Ultradent Products Inc. UltraSeal XT® hydro Hydro philic Pit & Fissure Sealant IFU [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jun 15]. Available from: https://assets.ctfassets.net/ wfptrcrbtkd0/c74aa521-2be4-43aa-89a7-cff037c7d5ca/ d7a4afe7b64255ee230120686a511fdd/UltraSeal_XT_hydro.pdf.

Salimetrics. Saliva Collection Handbook [Internet]. [cited 2018 Aug 16]. Available from:https://salimetrics.com /saliva-collection-handbook/ #before-saliva-collection.

Humphrey SP, Williamson RT. A review of saliva: normal composition, flow, and function. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(2):162-9.

International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 11405. Dental materials-Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. 2015.

Kumar IG, Bhagyalakshmi A, Shivalinga B, Raghunath N. Evaluation of the effect of moisture and saliva on the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional bonding system and moisture insensitive primer: An in vitro study. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2018;9(4):145-54.

Unal M, Hubbezoglu I, Zan R, Oznurhan F. The effect of Er:YAG laser and different surface conditioning procedures on microtensile bond strength of the fissure sealant containing amorphous calcium phosphate after artificial aging. Dent Mater J 2014;33(1):21-6.

Visuri SR, Gilbert JL, Wright DD, Wigdor HA, Walsh JT. Shear strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75(1):599-605.

Souza-Gabriel AE, Amaral FL, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements to Er:YAG laser-treated tooth structure. Oper Dent 2006;31(2):212-8.

Wattanapanich S, Owittayakul D, Boonsongsawat K, Tantitrakarnwatana K, Choeipong S, Chompu-inwai P. Effect of different adhesive systems on shear bond strength of sealants on enamel. CM Dent J 2010; 31(2):69-76.

Retief DH. Standardizing laboratory adhesion tests. Am J Dent 1991;4(5):231-6.

Stewardson DA, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The effect of clinically relevant thermocycling on the flexural properties of endodontic post materials. J Dent 2010; 38(5):437-42.

Kuhnisch J, Reichl FX, Heinrich-Weltzien R HR. S3 guideline “Pit and Fissure sealing”. Oralprophylaxe Kinderzahnheilkd 2016;38:120–5.

Kramer N, Frankenberger R.Therapeutic Fissure Sealing. In: Bekes K. Pit and Fissure Sealants.1st ed. Switzerland: Springer; 2018. 127-46.

Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27(2):89-99.

Khurshid Z, Zohaib S, Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Slowey PD, Almas K. Human saliva collection devices for proteomics: An update. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17(6):846.

Kassara Pattamapun. Innovation on development of articial saliva for patients with decreased saliva production. DAT NEWSLETTER 2016;30(2):10-3.

Ultradent PI. UltraSeal XT® [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jun15].Availablefrom:https://assets.ctfassets.net/wfptrcrbtkd0/6CDOVq0rW3Ia1bBseRnDYG/5de0b1fac706906d9c3577d36589e1ad/UltraSeal-XT-Sealant-Family-Sales-Sheet-1007280AR03.pdf.

Lepri TP, Souza-Gabriel AE, Atoui JA, Palma-Dibb RG, Pécora JD, Milori Corona SA. Shear bond strength of a sealant to contaminated-enamel surface: influence of erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser pretreatment. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20(6):386-94.

Barroso JM, Torres CP, Lessa FC, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Borsatto MC. Shear bond strength of pit-and-fissure sealants to saliva-contaminated and non- contaminated enamel. J Dent Child (Chic) 2005; 72(3):95-9.

Rirattanapong P, Vongsavan K, Surarit R. Shear bond strength of some sealants under saliva conta-mination. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2011;42(2):463-7.

Duangthip D, Lussi A. Microleakage and penetration ability of resin sealant versus bonding system when applied following contamination.Pediatr Dent 2003; 25(5):505-11.

Sabatini C, Andreana S, Wu Z. Surface preparation and isotropic shear bond strength properties of superficial bovine dentin. Open J Stomatol 2013;3(4):273-80.