Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Incisor Teeth Restored with Cast Post Versus Fiber Post
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 28, 2018
Keywords:
Fracture resistance Endodontically treated mandibular incisor teeth Cast post Fiber post
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study compared of fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular incisor teeth restored with cast post versus fiber post by performing endodontic treatment in 20 mandibular incisors, then reduced crowns until 2 millimeter above cervical portion of crowns was achieved. The teeth were embeded in resin acrylic in the tubes. The sample were divided into two groups of 10 each. First group was restored with all ceramic crown with cast post and core and the second group was restored with all ceramic crown with fiber post and composite core. All specimens were thermocycled and the fracture resistance was tested by using a universal testing machine in which the load applied to labio-incisal edge at 30-degree until failure occurred and the mode of failure was investigated. Results showed that the median of fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular incisor teeth restored with cast post and core and fiber post were 360.45 newton and 298.25 newton respectively, which were not different significantly (p=0.112). In both groups, only fracture of all ceramie crowns was observed
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Yodsuwan D, Satitdethkunchorn A, Thongsmak P. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Incisor Teeth Restored with Cast Post Versus Fiber Post. Khon Kaen Dent J [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 28 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];21(2):120-7. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KDJ/article/view/163656
Issue
Section
Articles
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการลงตีพิมพ์ในวิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์เฉพาะของคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใด ๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร จากคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นก่อนเท่านั้น
References
1. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87(4):438-45.
2. Valdivia ADCM, Raposo LHA, Simamoto-Junior PC, Novais VR, Soares CJ. The effect of fiber post presence and restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary incisors: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108(3):147-57.
3. Dilmener FT, Sipahi C, Dalkiz M. Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95(2):130-6.
4. Faria ACL, Rodrigues RCS, de Almeida Antunes RP, de Mattos MdGC, Ribeiro RF. Endodontically treated teeth: Characteristics and considerations to restore them. J Prosthodont Res 2011;55(2):69-74.
5. Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, Naert I. Effect of ferrule and post placement on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J Dent 2013;41(3):207-15.
6. da Silva NR, Raposo LHA, Versluis A, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Soares CJ. The effect of post, core, crown type, and ferrule presence on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated bovine anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104(5):306-17.
7. Raedel M, Fiedler C, Jacoby S, Boening KW. Survival of teeth treated with cast posts: A retrospective analysis over an observation period of up to 19.5 years. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(1):40-5.
8. Verissimo C, Simamoto Junior PC, Soares CJ, Noritomi PY, Santos-Filho PCF. Effect of the crown, post, and remaining coronal dentin on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111(3):234-46.
9. Dejak B, Ml otkowski A. Finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of cast posts compared to glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(2):115-26.
10. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Radovic I, et al. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2007; 20(5):287-91.
11. Maroulakos G, Nagy WW, Kontogiorgos ED. Fracture resistance of compromised endodontically treated teeth restored with bonded post and cores: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(3):390-7.
12. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(4):368-73.
13. Perez-Gonzalez A, Gonzalez-Lluch C, Sancho-Bru JL, Rodriguez-Cervantes PJ, Barjau-Escribano A, Fornrt- Navarro L. Experimental strength of restorations with fibre posts at different stages, with and without using a simulated ligament. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39(3):188-97.
14. Gluskin AH, Radke RA, Frost SL, Watanabe LG. The mandibular incisor: Rethinking guidelines for post and core design. J Endod 1995;21(1):33-7.
15. International Standard ISO/TS 11405: 2015 Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland. Available at: https:// www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=62898. Last accessed November 7, 2015.
16. Kronfeld R. Histologic study of the influence of function on the human periodontal membrane. J Am Dent Assoc 1931;18:1242–74.
17. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater 2006;22(5):477-85.
18. Amaral FL, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:340-53.
19. Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW. The effect of pressure on a maximum bite force in man. Arch Oral Biol 1997;42:11–17.
20. Ma PS, Nicholls JI, Junge T, Phillips KM. Load fatigue of teeth with different ferrule lengths, restored with fiber posts, composite resin cores, and all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:229-34.
21. Chun YH, Raffelt C, Pfeiffer H, Bizhang M, Saul G, Blunck U, et al. Restoring strength of incisors with veneers and full ceramic crowns. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:45-54.
22. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. [An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator.] Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953-60.
23. Xible AA, de Jesus Tavarez RR, de Araujo Cdos R, et al. Effect of cyclic loading on fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with conventional and esthetic posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:297–303.
24. Hu S, Osada T. Resistance to cyclic fatigue and fracture of structurally compromised root restored with different post and core restorations. Dent Mater J 2005;24:225–31.
25. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652–61.
26. Verissimo C, Simamoto Junior PC, Soares CJ, Noritomi PY, Santos-Filho PCF. Effect of the crown, post, and remaining coronal dentin on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111(3):234-46.
27. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings—a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009;25(1):121-8.
28. Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, Alexandre RS, Arrais CA, Reis AF. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102(5):306-12.
29. Türkmen C, Durkan M, Cimilli H, Öksüz M. Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19(4):363-9.
30. Zorzin J, Belli R, Wagner A, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Self-adhesive resin cements: adhesive performance to indirect restorative ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2014;16(6).
31. Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendale RH, Gilmour WH. The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:681–686.
32. Ho HH, Chu FC, Stokes AN. Fracture behavior of human mandibular incisors following endodontic treatment and porcelain veneer restoration. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14(3):260-4.
2. Valdivia ADCM, Raposo LHA, Simamoto-Junior PC, Novais VR, Soares CJ. The effect of fiber post presence and restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary incisors: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108(3):147-57.
3. Dilmener FT, Sipahi C, Dalkiz M. Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95(2):130-6.
4. Faria ACL, Rodrigues RCS, de Almeida Antunes RP, de Mattos MdGC, Ribeiro RF. Endodontically treated teeth: Characteristics and considerations to restore them. J Prosthodont Res 2011;55(2):69-74.
5. Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, Naert I. Effect of ferrule and post placement on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J Dent 2013;41(3):207-15.
6. da Silva NR, Raposo LHA, Versluis A, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Soares CJ. The effect of post, core, crown type, and ferrule presence on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated bovine anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104(5):306-17.
7. Raedel M, Fiedler C, Jacoby S, Boening KW. Survival of teeth treated with cast posts: A retrospective analysis over an observation period of up to 19.5 years. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(1):40-5.
8. Verissimo C, Simamoto Junior PC, Soares CJ, Noritomi PY, Santos-Filho PCF. Effect of the crown, post, and remaining coronal dentin on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111(3):234-46.
9. Dejak B, Ml otkowski A. Finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of cast posts compared to glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(2):115-26.
10. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Radovic I, et al. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2007; 20(5):287-91.
11. Maroulakos G, Nagy WW, Kontogiorgos ED. Fracture resistance of compromised endodontically treated teeth restored with bonded post and cores: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(3):390-7.
12. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(4):368-73.
13. Perez-Gonzalez A, Gonzalez-Lluch C, Sancho-Bru JL, Rodriguez-Cervantes PJ, Barjau-Escribano A, Fornrt- Navarro L. Experimental strength of restorations with fibre posts at different stages, with and without using a simulated ligament. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39(3):188-97.
14. Gluskin AH, Radke RA, Frost SL, Watanabe LG. The mandibular incisor: Rethinking guidelines for post and core design. J Endod 1995;21(1):33-7.
15. International Standard ISO/TS 11405: 2015 Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland. Available at: https:// www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=62898. Last accessed November 7, 2015.
16. Kronfeld R. Histologic study of the influence of function on the human periodontal membrane. J Am Dent Assoc 1931;18:1242–74.
17. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater 2006;22(5):477-85.
18. Amaral FL, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:340-53.
19. Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW. The effect of pressure on a maximum bite force in man. Arch Oral Biol 1997;42:11–17.
20. Ma PS, Nicholls JI, Junge T, Phillips KM. Load fatigue of teeth with different ferrule lengths, restored with fiber posts, composite resin cores, and all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:229-34.
21. Chun YH, Raffelt C, Pfeiffer H, Bizhang M, Saul G, Blunck U, et al. Restoring strength of incisors with veneers and full ceramic crowns. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:45-54.
22. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. [An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator.] Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953-60.
23. Xible AA, de Jesus Tavarez RR, de Araujo Cdos R, et al. Effect of cyclic loading on fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with conventional and esthetic posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:297–303.
24. Hu S, Osada T. Resistance to cyclic fatigue and fracture of structurally compromised root restored with different post and core restorations. Dent Mater J 2005;24:225–31.
25. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652–61.
26. Verissimo C, Simamoto Junior PC, Soares CJ, Noritomi PY, Santos-Filho PCF. Effect of the crown, post, and remaining coronal dentin on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111(3):234-46.
27. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings—a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009;25(1):121-8.
28. Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, Alexandre RS, Arrais CA, Reis AF. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102(5):306-12.
29. Türkmen C, Durkan M, Cimilli H, Öksüz M. Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19(4):363-9.
30. Zorzin J, Belli R, Wagner A, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Self-adhesive resin cements: adhesive performance to indirect restorative ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2014;16(6).
31. Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendale RH, Gilmour WH. The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:681–686.
32. Ho HH, Chu FC, Stokes AN. Fracture behavior of human mandibular incisors following endodontic treatment and porcelain veneer restoration. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14(3):260-4.