Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Alumina Plate Bonded with Resin Cement

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 28, 2018
Keywords:
Alumina plate Resin cement Shear bond strength Surface treatment

Main Article Content

Techit Subsomboon
Dental department, Nan Hospital, Nan
Nontapat Hemwutiphan
Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Amphur Muang, Chiang Mai
Nattida Suphatarkul
Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Amphur Muang, Chiang Mai
Nichapa Lomklang
Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Amphur Muang, Chiang Mai
Pemika Lertratanawong
Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Amphur Muang, Chiang Mai
Supichaya Choosuk
Undergraduate Student, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Amphur Muang, Chiang Mai
Thanapat Sastraruji
Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai
Apichai Yavirach
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai
Wissanee Jia-mahasap
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai
Piriya Yavirach
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai
Pisaisit Chaijareenont
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai

Abstract

This study compared shear bond strength of resin cement on different surface treatments of alumina plate. One hundred and thirty rectangular alumina plates were fabricated in size of 10x10x1 mm. Randomly divided alumina plate into ten groups by types of surface treatment: Group 1: Control, Group 2: Sandblast with 50 micron particle pressure 4 bar for 20 seconds, Group 3: Sandblast with 110 micron particle pressure 2 bar for 21 seconds, Group 4: Acid etch with 48% Hydrofluoric, Group 5: Acid etch with Piranha solution, Group 6: Sandblast with 50 micron particle following with 48% hydrofluoric, Group 7: Sandblast with 110 micron particle following with 48% hydrofluoric, Group 8: Sandblast with 50 micron particle following with Piranha’s solution, Group 9: Sandblast with 110 micron particle following with Piranha solution, Group 10 : applied with silane coupling agent. Eight specimens of each group were bonded with RelyX U200 resin cement and evaluated for shear bond strength at cross head speed 0.5 mm/min with universal testing machine. Other three specimens were measured surface roughness with profilometer under testing condition according to ISO4287:1997 with cut off level at 0.8 millimeters and test length of 5 millimeters. Statistical analysis of the mean shear bond strength and surface roughness parameter were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Last two specimens of each group were observed using scanning electron microscope for surface topography. This study found that surface abrasion with 50-micron alumina particle had highest mean shear bond strength (P<0.05) which related to highest roughness average parameter (P<0.05) and increased in irregular of surface topography from scanning electron microscope. In conclusion, various alumina surface treatment methods affected the mean shear bond strength. Alumina plate abraded with 50-micron abrasive alumina particle had the highest mean shear bond strength and surface roughness.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Subsomboon T, Hemwutiphan N, Suphatarkul N, Lomklang N, Lertratanawong P, Choosuk S, Sastraruji T, Yavirach A, Jia-mahasap W, Yavirach P, Chaijareenont P. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Alumina Plate Bonded with Resin Cement. Khon Kaen Dent J [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 28 [cited 2024 Apr. 24];21(2):94-106. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KDJ/article/view/163056
Issue
Vol. 21 No. 2 (2018)
Section
Research Articles

บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการลงตีพิมพ์ในวิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์เฉพาะของคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใด ๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร จากคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นก่อนเท่านั้น

Share |

References

1. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98(5):389-404.
2. Sanabani FAA, Madfa AA, Qudaimi NHA. Alumina ceramic for dental applications: a review article. Amer J Mater Res 2014;1(1):26-34.
3. Harris A, Vaughan B, Yeomans J, Smith P, Burnage S. Surface preparation of alumina for improved adhesive bond strength in armor applications. J Eur Ceram Soc 2012;33:149-60.
4. Chaijareenont P, Takahashi H, Nishiyama N, Arksornnukit M. Effects of silane coupling agents and solutions of different polarity on PMMA bonding to alumina. Dent Mater J 2012;31(4):610-6.
5. Su N, Yue L, Liao Y, Liu W, Zhang H, Li X, et al. The effect of various sandblasting conditions on surface changes of dental zirconia and shear bond strength between zirconia core and indirect composite resin. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7(3):214-23.
6. Smielak B, Klimek L. Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and etching duration on select surface roughness parameters for zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113(6):596-602.
7. Flamanta Q, Marro FG, Rovira JJR, Anglada M. Hydrofluoric acid etching of dental zirconia. Part 1: etching mechanism and surface characterization. J Eur Ceram Soc 2016;36(1):121-34.
8. Murthy V, Manoharan B, Livingstone D. Effect of four surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramics-a comparative in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(9):65-8.
9. Wahsh MM, Ghallab OH. Influence of different surface treatments on microshear bond strength of repair resin composite to two CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials. Tanta Dent J 2015;12(3):178-84.
10. Angkasith P, Burgess JO, Bottino MC, Lawson NC. Cleaning Methods for Zirconia Following Salivary Contamination. J Prosthodont 2016;25(5):375-9.
11. Re S, Augusti D, Sailer I, Spreafico D, Cerutti A. The effect of surface treatment on the adhesion of resin cements to Y-TZP. Eur J Esthet Dent 2008;3(2):186-96.
12. Moon JE, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effects of airborne-particle abrasion protocol choice on the surface characteristics of monolithic zirconia materials and the shear bond strength of resin cement. Ceram Int 2016;42(1):1552-62.
13. Lohbauer U, Zipperle M, Rischka K, Petschelt A, Müller FA. Hydroxylation of dental zirconia surfaces: characterization and bonding potential. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;87(2):461-7.
14. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sûahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25(9):699-705.
15. Sriamporn T, Thamronganskul N, Busabok C, Poolthong S, Uo M, Tagami J. Dental zirconia can be etched by hydrofluoric acid. Dent Mater J 2014;33(1):79-85.
16. Liu D, Tsoi JKH, Matinlinna JP, Wong HM. Effects of some chemical surface modifications on resin zirconia adhesion. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;46:23-30.
17. Flamanta Q, Anglada M. Hydrofluoric acid etching of dental zirconia. Part 2: effect on flexural strength and ageing behavior. J Eur Ceram Soc 2016;36(1):135-45.
18. Piascik JR, Swift EJ, Braswell K, Stoner BR. Surface fluorination of zirconia: adhesive bond strength comparison to commercial primers. Dent Mater 2012;28(6):604-8.
19. Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of dual-cured resin cement to zirconia ceramic using phosphate acid ester monomer and zirconate coupler. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;77(1):28-33.
20. Silthampitag P, Chaijareenont P, Tattakorn K, Banjongprasert C, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J 2016;35(4):668-74.
21. Inspectionengineering.com[Internet]. Westlake: Inspection Engineering [updated 26 Dec 20171 Jan 2018]. Available from:www.inspectionengineering.com/Images/Surface FinishExplain.pdf/.
22. Kaizer MR, Gonçalves APR, Soares PB, Zhang Y, Cesar PF, Cava SS, et al. Mono or polycrystalline alumina-modified hybrid ceramics. Dent Mater 2016;32(3):450-60.
23. Awliya W, Odén A, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME. Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56(1):9-13.
24. Özcan M, Alkumru HN, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14(4):335-9.
25. Bona AD, Donassollo TA, Demarco FF, Barrett AA, Mecholsky JJ. Characterization and surface treatment effects on topography of a glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia-reinforced ceramic. Dent Mater 2007;23(6):769-75.
26. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Yazici AR, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent 2009;37(11):848-56.
27. Passos SP, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Santos MJMC, Jr GCS. Shear bond strength of resin cement bonded to alumina ceramic after treatment by aluminum oxide sandblasting or silica coating. J Prosthodont 2011;20(7):561-5.