Development of Endotracheal and Tracheostomy Tube Suctioning Model: A Nursing Educational Innovation

Main Article Content

สุวีณา เบาะเปลี่ยน
อริสรา อยู่รุ่ง
แอน ไทยอุดม
เนตรดาว ชัชวาลย์
ชยุตรา สุทธิลักษณ์

Abstract

Endotracheal suctioning is a common nursing procedure in clinical practice and essential to eliminate secretion to open airway clearance and prevent airway obstruction especially in critically ill patients and those with ineffective airway clearance. However, this crucial procedure may cause potential complications without accurate knowledge and adequate skill training. The Royal Thai Army Nursing College (RTANC) realized the importance of preparing knowledge, nursing skills and confidence for nursing students to perform proper nursing procedures before practicing with real patients in the hospital to promote patient safety and reduce complications. Nevertheless, the available manikins in the nursing lab did not provide realistic functions for effective training, necessitating the development of the RTANC endotracheal and tracheostomy tube suctioning model. The suctioning model is an innovation designed to support nursing education. Nursing students could also practice the procedure in the lab when needed. According to the evaluation by the second year undergraduate nursing students (n = 83) and the nursing instructors (n = 5), the users rated their satisfaction at a very high level ( = 4.7 and 4.8 out of 5 respectively). The procedural training model is useful for teaching and learning in nursing. This model should be used in parallel with improving knowledge relevant to the current principal and techniques of endotracheal and tracheostomy tube suctioning, its complications and appropriate nursing care for patients before, during and after this procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
เบาะเปลี่ยนส, อยู่รุ่งอ, ไทยอุดมแ, ชัชวาลย์เ, สุทธิลักษณ์ช. Development of Endotracheal and Tracheostomy Tube Suctioning Model: A Nursing Educational Innovation. J Royal Thai Army Nurses [nternet]. 2018Dec.21 [cited 2021Nov.30];19(3):62-0. vailable from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/161497
Section
Academic articles

References

1. Frota OP, Marisa Dias Rolan L, Ferreira AM. Knowledge about endotracheal suctioning on the part of intensive care nursing professionals: a descriptive study: 1. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing. 2013;12(3). doi/105935 %2F1676-428520134115

2. Boonchoochuay R. Innovative Suction Training “RTAFNC Suction Model.” Journal of The Police Nurse. 2015; 7(1): 45-52. (in Thai)

3. Javadi M, Hejr H, Zolad M, Khalili A, Paymard A. Comparing the effect of endotracheal tube suction using open method with two different size catheters 12 and 14 on discharge secretion, pain, heart rate, blood pressure, and arterial oxygen saturation of patients in the intensive care unit: A randomized clinical trial. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2017;10(5):1312.

4. American Association for Respiratory C. AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways 2010. Respiratory care. 2010;55(6):758.

5. Negro A, Ranzani R, Villa M, Manara D. Survey of Italian intensive care unit nurses’ knowledge about endotracheal suctioning guidelines. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing. 2014;30(6): 339-45.

6. Bülbül Maraş G, Kocaçal Güler E, Eşer İ, Köse Ş. Knowledge and practice of intensive care nurses for endotracheal suctioning in a teaching hospital in western Turkey. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing. 2017;39:45-54.

7. Billings L, Allen P, Armstrong M, Green A. Creating and launching. Innovative nursing education programs: perils and pearls. Nursing education perspectives. 2012;33(5):292-6.

8. Oermann MH. Technology and Teaching Innovations in Nursing Education: Engaging the Student. Nurse Educator. 2015;40(2):55-6.

9. Körükcü Ö, Kukulu K. Innovation in nursing education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;9:369-72.

10. Ricketts B. The role of simulation for learning within pre-registration nursing education — A literature review. Nurse Education Today. 2011;31(7):650-4.

11. Johnson MP, Hickey KT, Scopa-Goldman J, Andrews T, Boerem P, Covec M, et al. Manikin Versus Web-Based Simulation for Advanced Practice Nursing Students. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2014;10(6):e317-e23.

12. Foronda C, Liu S, Bauman EB. Evaluation of Simulation in Undergraduate Nurse Education: An Integrative Review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013;9(10):e409-e16.

13. Shin S, Park J-H, Kim J-H. Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: Meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today. 2015;35(1):176-82.

14. Rovamo LM, Mattila M-M, Andersson S, Rosenberg PH. Testing of midwife neonatal resuscitation skills with a simulator manikin in a low-risk delivery unit: Midwife neonatal resuscitation skills. Pediatrics International. 2013;55(4): 465-71.

15. Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Simulation-based learning in nurse education: systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010;66(1):3-15.

16. Wongprach B. & Poomsanguan K. Innovation Development of The Army Nurse Condom Ring for male patient : Applying a drainage condom. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurse. 2017;19(1):55-65. (in Thai)