Association between parental, peer, and teacher attachment, and cyberbullying

Main Article Content

Komsan Kiatrungrit


Objective: To study association between parent, peer, and teacher attachment, and cyberbullying.

Method: This is a cross–sectional descriptive research in 1,144 Mattayomsuksa 1–3 students in Bangkok. The research tools were personal information questionnaires, cyberbullying questionnaires, and attachment to parents, peers (inventory of parental attachment and peer attachment-Revised; IPPA-R) and teachers questionnaires (Inventory of teacher-student relationships; IT-SR). Descriptive statistics were used to find frequency, percent, and mean. Analytic statistics such as chi-square, anova, and multinomial logistic regression were employed to find the association.

Result: The study showed that more than half of the students have experienced cyberbullying (56.7%). They were divided into  three groups in following order 1) victims group (25.2%), 2) both victims and cyberbullies group (24.4%), and bullies group (7.2%). Male, low average family income, social media usage and Instagram usage were found to be related with previously bullies group. The victims and bullies group were found to be related with male, Mattayom 1 students, time spent on internet for more than 7 hours/day, not using internet to find information, and weak attachment to parents and friends. The victims group were found to be related with Mattayom 1 students, time spent on internet for more than 7 hours/day, not using internet to find information and weak attachment to parents, but strong attachment to teachers.

Discussion: Many of students had experiences about cyberbullying in various ways such as being victims, bulliers, or both. Various factors were found to be associatated with these experiences. Individual factors which found to be associated with cyberbullying are sex and level of education. Moreover, internet usage such as time spent on and kind of media use were also found to be associated with these experiences. One important protective factor which found in this is attachment, whether it be parent or peer attachments. They were found associated with decrease in cyberbullying experiences. Despite teacher attachment was found to be associated with increase in being cyberbullying victim, it might be explained by teacher who have good relationship with the victims can be their counsellors.

Conclusion: According to the study, parents and teachers should be encouraged to establish good relationships with children through communication, build trust, and reduce alienation. In addition, building good social skill in children is important to make them have good relationship with friends and prevent cyberbullying.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kiatrungrit, K. (2021). Association between parental, peer, and teacher attachment, and cyberbullying. Journal of the Psychiatric Association of Thailand, 65(3), 245–262. Retrieved from
Original Articles


1. Rungsakorn B. Effects of family conrext and self-esteem towards cyber-bullying attitudes among female students secondary school in Bangkok. Mahidol University: Mahidol University; 2011.
2. Rivers I, Noret N. ‘I h8 u’: findings from a five‐year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal. 2010;36(4):643-71.
3. Slonje R, Smith PK. Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? Scandinavian journal of psychology. 2008;49(2):147-54.
4. Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines. 2008;49(4):376-85.
5. Songsiri N, Musikaphan W. Cyber-bullying among Secondary and Vocational Students in Bangkok JPSS. 2011;19:235-42.
6. Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, Lattanner MR. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological bulletin. 2014;140(4):1073-137.
7. Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Cyberbullying and Self-Esteem. J Sch Health. 2010;80:614-21.
8. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bullying beyond the schoolyard: preventing and responding to cyberbullying SAGE Ltd.: Corwin Press; 2009.
9. Arslan S, Savaser S, Hallett V, Balci S. Cyberbullying among primary school students in Turkey: self-reported prevalence and associations with home and school life. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2012;15(10):527-33.
10. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2013;42(5):711-22.
11. Wright MF, Aoyama I, Kamble SV, Li Z, Soudi S, Lei L, et al. Peer attachment and cyber aggression involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese adolescents. Societies. 2015;5(2):339-53.
12. Tobias S, Chapanar T. Predicting resilience after cyberbully victimization among high school students. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research (JPER). 2016;24(1):7-25.
13. Teacher-child relationships and friendships and peer victimization across the school year. [Internet]. 2016 [cited November 28, 2016].
14. Jungert T, Piroddi, B., Thornberg, R. . Early adolescents' motivations to defend victims in school bullying and their perceptions of student–teacher relationships: A self-determination theory approach. 2016, Dec 1 ed. Journal of Adolescence: Elsevier Ltd; 2016.
15. A development of cyber bullying behavioral indicators for youth in Songkha province [Internet]. 2013.
16. Lucktong A. The impact of parental, peer,and school attachment on the psychological well-being of early adolescents in Thailand. Mahidol University: Mahidol University; 2016.
17. Murray C, Zvoch K. The inventory of teacher-student relationships: Factor structure, reliability, and validity among African American youth in low-income urban schools. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 2010.
18. Caravita SC, Di Blasio P, Salmivalli C. Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social development. 2009;18(1):140-63.
19. Crick NR, Grotpeter JK. Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child development. 1995:710-22.
20. Solberg ME, Olweus D, Endresen IM. Bullies and victims at school: Are they the same pupils? British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2007;77(2):441-64.
21. Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, Daciuk J. Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review. 2012;34(1):63-70.
22. Kowalski RM, Limber SP, Agatston WP. Cyberbullying. Markono Print Media Pte Ltd: Blackwell publishing; 2008.
23. Jansen DE, Veenstra R, Ormel J, Verhulst FC, Reijneveld SA. Early risk factors for being a bully, victim, or bully/victim in late elementary and early secondary education. The longitudinal TRAILS study. BMC public health. 2011;11(1):440.
24. Tippett N, Wolke D. Socioeconomic status and bullying: a meta-analysis. American journal of public health. 2014;104(6):e48-e59.
25. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of adolescence. 2004;27(3):319-36.
26. Akbulut Y, Sahin YL, Eristi B. Cyberbullying victimization among Turkish online social utility members. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2010;13(4).
27. Berson IR, Berson MJ, Ferron JM. Emerging risks of violence in the digital age: Lessons for educators from an online study of adolescent girls in the United States. Journal of School Violence. 2002;1(2):51-71.
28. Mesch GS. Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2009;12(4):387-93.
29. Roberto AJ, Eden J, Savage MW, Ramos-Salazar L, Deiss DM. Outcome evaluation results of school-based cybersafety promotion and cyberbullying prevention intervention for middle school students. Health communication. 2014;29(10):1029-42.
30. Whittaker E, Kowalski RM. Cyberbullying via social media. Journal of School Violence. 2015;14(1):11-29.
31. Michal P, Pawel D, Tatsuaki M, Fumito M, Rafal R, Kenji A, et al. In the service of online order: Tackling cyber-bullying with machine learning and affect analysis. International Journal of Computational Linguistics Research. 2010;1(3):135-54.
32. Armsden GC, McCauley E, Greenberg MT, Burke PM, Mitchell JR. Parent and peer attachment in early adolescent depression. Journal of abnormal child psychology. 1990;18(6):683-97.
33. Navarro R, Serna C. Spanish youth perceptions about cyberbullying: Qualitative research into understanding cyberbullying and the role that parents play in its solution. Cyberbullying Across the Globe: Springer; 2016. p. 193-218.
34. Kaur K, Sandhu D. Cyberbullying among adolescents: Attachment with parents and peers. Journal of Research: THE BEDE ATHENAEUM. 2015;6(1):104-18.
35. Makri-Botsari E, Karagianni G. Cyberbullying in Greek adolescents: The role of parents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;116:3241-53.
36. Bayraktar F, Machackova H, Dedkova L, Cerna A, Ševčíková A. Cyberbullying: The discriminant factors among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyberbully-victims in a Czech adolescent sample. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2015;30(18):3192-216.
37. Kokkinos CM, Antoniadou N, Asdre A, Voulgaridou K. Parenting and Internet behavior predictors of cyber-bullying and cyber-victimization among preadolescents. Deviant Behavior. 2016;37(4):439-55.
38. Stevens V, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Oost P. Relationship of the family environment to children's involvement in bully/victim problems at school. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2002;31(6):419-28.
39. Marini ZA, Dane AV, Bosacki SL, CURA Y. Direct and indirect bully‐victims: differential psychosocial risk factors associated with adolescents involved in bullying and victimization. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression. 2006;32(6):551-69.
40. Bacchini D, Esposito G, Affuso G. Social experience and school bullying. Journal of community & applied social psychology. 2009;19(1):17-32.
41. Andersen RJ. A new model of students' perceptions of the primary school classroom emotional environment: a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Psychology at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University; 2009.
42. Individual Characteristics and the Multiple Contexts of Adolescent Bullying: An Ecological Perspective. [Internet]. Journal Of Youth & Adolescence. 2009 [cited November 29, 2016]. Available from: