The association of short cervical length after successfully inhibiting preterm labor with recurrent preterm labor and preterm delivery

Main Article Content

Panadda Khemmarattrakul

Abstract

To study the association of cervical length after successfully inhibiting preterm labor with recurrent preterm labor and preterm delivery by measuring the transvaginal ultrasound after successful suppression of preterm labor for at least 24 hours. The patients were classified into two groups, those with cervical length < 25 mm (short cervix) and those with cervical length  25 mm (normal cervix). One hundred and fifteen women with threatened preterm labor or preterm labor were included, of which 33 participants (28.70%) had a short cervical length and 82 participants (71.30%) had a normal cervical length. Baseline characteristics were not different in the two groups except the maternal age. The mean gestational age at the time of participation in both groups were not significantly different. The mean gestational age at delivery was 262.76 ± 11.20 days in the short cervical length group and 267.17 ± 8.67 days in the normal cervical length group (P = 0.022). After following the pregnancy showed recurrent preterm labor in short and normal cervical groups equal to 36.36% and 18.29% (P = 0.039) and preterm delivery were 33.33 and 10.98% (P = 0.004) respectively. The calculated risk ratio stands at 3.03. In conclusion, the cervical length in pregnant women after successfully inhibiting preterm labor that less than 25 mm was associated with recurrent preterm labor and preterm delivery. The probability of experiencing preterm birth was 3 times higher in the short cervical length group compared with the normal cervical length group.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Khemmarattrakul P. The association of short cervical length after successfully inhibiting preterm labor with recurrent preterm labor and preterm delivery. JMPH4 [internet]. 2025 Jul. 25 [cited 2026 Jan. 12];15(2):135-42. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMPH4/article/view/265958
Section
Original Articles

References

Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2019 ;7(1):37–46.

World Health Organization. Preterm birth [internet]. [updated 2023 May 10; cited 2023 Aug 22] Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth

Kinpon K, Chaiyarach S. The Incidence and Risk Factors for Preterm Delivery in Northeast Thailand. Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2021;29:100-11.

Patel R. Short- and Long-Term outcomes for extremely preterm infants. American Journal of Perinatology 2016;33(3):318–28.

Berger R , Rath W, Harald Abele, Garnier Y, Kuon RJ, Maul H, et al. Reducing the Risk of Preterm Birth by Ambulatory Risk Factor Management. Deutsches Arzteblatt International 2019; 116(50):858-64.

Rundell K , Panchal P. Preterm Labor: Prevention and Management. American family physician 2017;95(6):366-72.

Shennan A, Suff N, Simpson JL, Jacobsson B, Mol BWJ, Grobman WA. FIGO good practice recommendations on progestogens for prevention of preterm delivery. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2021; 155(1):16–8.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Updated Clinical Guidance for the Use of Progesterone Supplementation for the Prevention of Recurrent Preterm Birth. [internet]. ACOG 2023. [cited 2023 Aug 22]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2023/04/updated-guidance-use-of-progesterone-supplementation-for-prevention-of-recurrent-preterm-birth

O'Hara S, Zelesco M, Sun Z. Cervical length for prediction preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques. Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine 2013 ; 16(3): 124-34.

Zhang M, Zhang X, Yang H., Shi C. Cervical length at 28–32 weeks of gestation predicts preterm birth. Maternal-Fetal Medicine 2020; 3(3): 185–9.

Kagan KO, Sonek J. How to measure cervical length. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2015 ; 45(3): 358–62.

Fox NS, Jean-Pierre C, Predanic M, Chasen ST. Short cervix: is a follow‐up measurement useful? Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007 ; 29(1): 44–6.

Mella MT, Berghella V. Prediction of preterm birth: cervical sonography. Seminars in Perinatology 2009 ;33(5): 317–24.

Rennert KN, Breuking S, Schuit E, Bekker MN, Woiski M, De Boer MA, et al. Change in cervical length after arrested preterm labor and risk of preterm birth. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2021; 58(5):750–56.

Waks A, Martinez-King LC, Santiago G, Laurent LC, Jacobs M. Developing a risk profile for spontaneous preterm birth and short interval to delivery among patients with threatened preterm labor. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 2022; 4(6): 100727. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100727

Ho N, Liu CZ, Nguyen AD, Lehner C, Amoako A, Sekar R. Prediction of time of delivery using cervical length measurement in women with threatened preterm labor. Journal of Maternal-fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2021; 34(16): 2649–54.