Comparison of Low Ionic Strength Solution, Polyethylene Glycol and Manual Polybrene for Antibody Detection

ผู้แต่ง

  • อุดม ติ่งต้อย
  • ศศิธร เพชรจันทร ภาควิชาเวชศาสตร์การธนาคารเลือด คณะแพทยศาสตร์ศิริราชพยาบาล มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล
  • ทัศนีย์ สกุลดำรงค์พานิช
  • จริยา สายพิณ

คำสำคัญ:

Antibody screening LISS PEG MP

บทคัดย่อ

Abstract :

The sensitivity of the antibody detection technique is important in providing compatible
blood. In cases that a pattern of weak reactions fails to indicate specificity, or the presence of an
antibody is suspected but cannot be demonstrated, the use of enhancing reagents may be helpful.
Objectives :  The purpose of this study was to compare low ionic strength solution (LISS), polyethylene
glycol  (PEG) and manual polybrene (MP) techniques for enhancing antibody detection in indirect antiglobulin
 testing (IAT). Material and methods : Antibody screening was performed in 200 unknown
donor  blood samples in parallel. The antibody screening was also performed in 122 samples of known
antibody  specificities, of which these samples gave positive results by all techniques. The antibody
titration  was performed on these samples to compare the sensitivity of the assays. Results: The results
were  evaluated by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. The positive results of antibody screening performed
in  the 200 unknown samples, using LISS-IAT, PEG-IAT and MP-IAT techniques, were found in 5(2.5%),
5(2.5%)  and 4(2%) samples, respectively. The results evaluated by Friedman test showed no significant
difference among LISS, PEG and MP techniques (P>0.05). In addition, titration studies were performed
on  101 samples of known antibody specificities. Comparison of mean scores of the three techniques
demonstrated  that LISS-IAT (15.6) gave a higher mean score in detecting anti-Lea and anti-Leb than the
MP-IAT (11.2) and the PEG-IAT (10.1), respectively. However, the PEG-IAT showed a higher mean
scores  in detecting anti-D, anti-E, anti-Jka, anti-Jkb, anti-M and anti-N than the MP-IAT and the LISSIAT,
 respectively. Furthermore, PEG-IAT had a higher mean score in detecting anti-Fya, anti-Fyb, anti-
S,  anti-Mia and anti-H than LISS-IAT and MP-IAT, respectively. Conclusion : The PEG-IAT is the best
in all technique systems for antibody detection. But the LISS-IAT is the better technique for antibody
detection  in Lewis system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2019-06-27

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ (Original article)