Diagnostic application of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69898/jhtm.35.2025.274576Keywords:
Myelodysplastic syndrome, FlowcytometryAbstract
Background: The diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is based on a combination of clinical history,
morphological assessment, genetic studies and the exclusion of other diseases. Diagnosing MDS in uncertain
morphology, especially in patients with normal karyotype or low myeloblast count remains a challenging issue.
Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of an in-house 12-parameter flow
cytometry scoring method for diagnosing MDS. Materials and Methods: We collected 48 patients with cytopenia of
unknown cause. The diagnosis of MDS was made using the WHO 2016 criteria. Flow cytometry criteria using
12 parameters included the following markers: %CD34, CD7/CD13 expression in progenitor cells, side scatter
(SSC) of granulocyte/lymphocyte ratio, CD13CD16, CD16CD11b, CD13CD11b, CD15CD10 expression in maturing
neutrophils, CD36CD14, %CD56 in monocyte, %CD34+CD10+ B-cells, CD71CD235a and CD36/CD235a in erythroid
cells. The sensitivity and specificity of flow cytometry score for diagnosing MDS were analyzed. To validate
the scoring method, we applied the panel to another set of cytopenic patients (n = 45) and evaluated its performance.
Result: Of the 48 patients, 36 were diagnosed with MDS, while 12 did not meet the diagnostic criteria.
A multiparameter flow cytometry score ≥ 3 showed 77.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive
value and 60% negative predictive value for MDS diagnosis. The parameters %CD34, SSC of granulocyte/
lymphocyte ratio, CD13CD16, CD11bCD13, CD11bCD16 and CD71CD235a were strong indicators for MDS diagnosis.
When applied to the validation set (n = 45), the results were comparable to those of the training set. Conclusion:
Multiparameter flow cytometry is helpful in diagnosing MDS with inconclusive morphology. A score ≥ 3 appears
to be an appropriate cut-off value for diagnosis.
Downloads
References
Daniel A. Arber, Attilio Orazi, Robert Hasserjian, Jürgen Thiele et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391-405.
Guillermo Montalban-Bravo and Guillermo Garcia-Manero. Myelodysplastic syndromes;2018 update on diagnosis risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:129-47.
Gibson CJ, Ebert BL and Steensma DP. Myelodysplastic syndromes. In: Hoffman R, Benz EJJ, Siberstein LE et al, eds. Hematology basic principles and practice. 7thed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier; 2017:944-69.
Vardiman JW. Hematopathological concepts and controversies in the diagnosis and classification of myelodysplastic syndromes. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2006:199-204.
TM Westers, R Ireland, W Kerm, C Alhan, JS Balleisen, P Bettelheim et al. Standardization of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes: a report from an international consortium and the European Leukemia Net Working Group. Leukemia. 2012;26:1730-41.
Bettina Karai, Eszter Szantho, Janos Kappelmayer, Zsuzsa Hevessy. Flow cytometry in the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes. EJIFCC. 2013;23:109-16.
Della Porta MG, Picone C. Diagnostic utility of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2017;9:e2017017
Van de Lossdrecht AA, Alhan C, Bene MC, Della Porta MG, Drager AM, Feuillard J et al. Standardization of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndrome: report from the first European LeukemiaNet working conference on flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica 2009;94:1124-34.
Kiyoyuki Ogata, Yoshifumi Kishikawa, Chikako Satoh, Hideto Tamura, Kazuo Dan, Akio Hayashi. Diagnosis application of flow cytometry characteristics of CD34+ cells in low-grade myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2006;108;1037-44.
Della Porta MG, Picone C, Pascutto C, Malcovati L, Tamura H, Handa H, et al. Multicenter validation of a reproducible flow cytometric score for the diagnosis of low-grade myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a European LeukemiaNET study. Haematologica. 2012;97:1209-17
Ghulam J. Mufti, Donal P. Mclornan, Arjan A. van de Loosdrecht, Ulrich Germing, Robert P. Hasserjian. Diagnostic algorithm for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2018;32:1679-96. .
Bento LC, Correia RP, Pitangueiras Mangueira CL, De Souz a Barroso, Rocha FA, Bacal NS and Marti LC. The use of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes: A review. Front Oncol. 2017;7:270.
A Porwit, AA van de Loosdrecht, P Bettelheim, Eidenschink Brodersen, K Bobury, E Cremers et al. Revisiting guidelines for integration of flow cytometry results in the WHO classification of myelodysplastic syndromes-proposal from the International/European LeukemiaNet Working Group for Flow Cytometry in MDS. Leukemia. 2014;28;1793-8.
Westers TM, Cremers EM, Oelschlaegel U, Johansson U, Bettelheim P, Matarraz S, et al. Immunophenotypic analysis of erythroid dysplasia in myelodysplastic syndromes. A report from the IMDSFlow working group. Haematologica. 2017;102: 308–19.
Carmen Mariana Aenei, Tiphanie Picot, Emmanuelle Tavernier, Denis Guyotat and Lydia Campos Catafal. Diagnostic utility of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes. Front Oncol.2016;6:1-9.
Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Solé F, et al. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood.2012;120: 2454-6.
Della Porta MG, Malcovati L, Invernizzi R, Travaglino E, Pascutto C, Maffioli M, et al. Flow cytometry evaluation of erythroid dysplasia in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2006;20:549-55.
Wells DA, Benesch M, Loken MR, Vallejo C, Myerson D, Leisenring WM, et al. Myeloid and monocytic dyspoiesis as determined by flow cytometric scoring in myelodysplastic syndrome correlates with the IPSS and with outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2003;102:394-403.
Sternberg A, Killick S, Littlewood T, Hatton C, Peniket A, Seidl T, et al. Evidence for reduced B-cell progenitors in early (low- risk) myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2005;106:2982-91.
van de Loosdrecht AA, Westers TM, Westra AH, Drager AM, van der Velden VH, Ossenkoppele GJ. Identification of distinct prognostic subgroups in low and intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes by flow cytometry. Blood. 2008; 111:1067-77.
Scott BL, Wells DA, Loken MR, Myerson D, Leisenring WM, Deeg HJ. Validation of a flow cytometric scoring system as a prognostic indicator for posttransplantation outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2008;112:2681-6.
Duetz C, Westers T.M., van de Loosdrecht A.A. Clinical Implication of Multi-Parameter Flow Cytometry in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Pathobiology. 2019;86;14-23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.