National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Group Serology in Thailand, 2002-2003 Experience

Authors

  • Roongrasamee Soisangwan Bureau of Laboratory Quality Standards, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health

Keywords:

External quality assessment, EQA, Blood group serology, Blood banking

Abstract

Abstract: The main objective of the present study was to review and analyse the evaluation results of the National External Quality Assessment Scheme in Blood Group Serology (NEQAS in BGS) for various blood bank laboratories in Thailand. Packed red blood cells and serum samples were sent to 622 and 653 participating blood bank laboratories of both government and private hospitals during
the fiscal year 2002 and 2003, respectively. The test items were used for ABO and Rh blood groupings and unexpected antibody screening and identification. The test results were analyzed and evaluated for the standard scores which ranged from 4.0 (excellent), < 4.0-3.5 (very good), 3.5-3.0 (good), < 3.0 - 2.5 (satisfactory) and < 2.5 (unacceptable). It was found that 51% (285/563) of participating laboratories continuously reported back the test results. Approximately 90% of these participating laboratories had acceptable results in individual tests. Among these, 16% (45/285), 36% (103/285), 27% (44/163) and 73% (35/48) of the laboratories had excellent results in ABO blood grouping, Rh blood grouping and unexpected antibody screening and identification, respectively. However,5% (15/285) and 0.3% (1/285) of the laboratories had unacceptable results for ABO and Rh blood grouping, Rh blood grouping and unexpected antibody screening and identification, respectively. However,5% (15/285) and 0.3% (1/285) of the laboratories had unacceptable results for ABO and Rh blood grouping, respectively. The main errors involved non-standard testing procedures, wrong interpretations of the test results and discrepancy results between cell and serum groupings. These data are useful for future planning and quality improvement of the blood bank laboratories. NEQAS in BGS is a main support for laboratory accreditation and conforms to the health policy of the Ministry of Public Health of Thailand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bond KL. Safe blood starts with me! Blood safe lives! Stories and souvenirs from World Health Organization Day 2000 together with useful information on blood safety. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.

Linden JV and Schmidt GB. An overview of state effort to improve transfusion medicine. The New York State Model. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999;123:482-5.

Global data base on blood safety. Summary report 1998-1999. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.

Gibbs WN and Britten AFH. Guidelines for the blood transfusion service. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.

Medgyesi G and Kadar J. Quality control in blood transfusion centers. In: Hollan SR, Wangstaff W, Leikola J and Lothe F. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1990.

Ruddmann SV. Textbook of blood banking and transfusion medicine. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1995.

Berte LM and Lupo B. Quality in blood banking. In: Harmening DM (ed.). Modern blood banking and transfusion practices. 4" edition: Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 1999.

American Association of Blood Banks (AABB). Technical manual 12" and 13" edition & Standards 1st-19th editions. Bethesda: American Association of Blood Banks, 1999. (CD Rom version)

Peddecord KM, Cada RL. Clinical laboratory proficiency test performance. Its relationship to structural, process and environmental variables. Am J Clin Pathol 1980;73:380-5.

Shahangian S. Proficiency testing in laboratory medicine. Uses and limitations. Arch Pathol lab Med 1998;122:15-30.

Growe GH. Standards, accreditation and proficiency testing in the management of blood and blood products in hospitals. Can Med Assoc J 1996;154:755.

สมาคมเทคนิคการแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย สถาบันพัฒนาและรับรองคุณภาพโรงพยาบาล สำนักมาตรฐานห้องปฏิบัติการ กรมวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์. มาตรฐานห้องปฏิบัติการทางการแพทย์ 2544. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์ อาร์ ดี พี 2546.

สมาคมเทคนิคการแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย. มาตรฐานงานเทคนิคการแพทย์ 2544 สำหรับห้องปฏิบัติการทางการแพทย์. กรุงเทพมหานคร: บริษัท รี เชิร์ช ดีเวลลอปเมนท์ โปรโมชั่น นสะติติ๊ว จำกัด, 2544.

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189: Medical laboratories-Particular requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: ISO copyright office, 2003.

Linden JV, Paul B and Dresseer KP. A report of 104 transfusion errors in New York State. Transfusion 1992,32:601-6.

Linden JV. Errors in transfusion medicine scope of the problem. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999;123:563-5.

Lumadue JA, Boyd JS, Ness PM. Adherence to a strict specimen labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood bank specimens. Transfusion1997437:1169-72.

Schreiber GB, Busch MP, Kleinman SH, Korelitz JJ. The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infection. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1685-90.

Sazama K. Report of 355 transfusion-associated deaths: 1976 through 1985. Transfusion 1990; 30: 583-90.

พิมล เชี่ยวศิลป์. Haemovigilance ใน: พิมล เชี่ยวศิลป์ และ สร้อยสอางค์ พิกุลสด บรรณาธิการ. คำบรรยายการประชุมวิชาการ ประจำปี พ.ศ. 2545 เรื่อง 50th Anniversary of Thai Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service: Adequate Safe Blood for All. กรุงเทพมหานคร: บริษัท ธรรมสาร จำกัด, 2546:115-25.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Section

นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ (Original article)