A continuity long-term care system for elderly: Scoping reviews
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The increasing number of Thai elderlies have direct effects on the social welfare system and healthcare services.
Objectives: To study knowledge gaps for determining guidelines for the development of a continuity long-term care system for the elderly in Thailand.
Methods: The documents about long-term care policy in the United Kingdom, Germany, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, and Thailand were reviewed. The scope of the review included 1) The service models 2) The service accessibility process and 3) The service expenditure.
Result: Twenty-four articles and twelve gray literature were identified. It was found that 1) The service models of the long-term care system consisted of 2 models, the formal model provide by both the state and the private sectors and the informal model provided by the family and community. The benefits of the two models were available in both cash and other forms, such as home care 2) The service accessibility process of the long-term care system provided by a screening system classifying the level of care needs according to the criteria for daily activities of the elderly and 3) The service expenditure of the long-term care system was paid by the government through the tax system, the social security system, and the self-payment.
Conclusions: Development guidelines to address the knowledge gaps in the service model, service assessing process, and service expenditure included 1) The development of caregivers in both quantity and quality 2) The development of financial support mechanisms 3) The provision of appropriate benefits packages 4) Organizing activities to enhance the quality of life 5) Adjustment of hospitals' roles 6) Increase the number of service centers 7) Modification of screening criteria to account for medical conditions, daily living, and finances and 8) The development of financial and fiscal systems and mechanisms to support future expenses.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวิทยาลัยพยาบาลบรมราชชนนี จังหวัดนนทบุรี
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับวิทยาลัยพยาบาลบรมราชชนนี จังหวัดนนทบุรี และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่น ในวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใด ๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
References
Nori T, Pakaiya N. Long term care: Long-term care in Thai society. Nonthaburi: Parbpim press; 2021. (in Thai).
Thai Health Promotion Foundation. Confronting the aging society: the challenge of rising cost burdens. [Internet]. 2021. Bangkok: Thai Health Promotion Foundation [cited 2023 Mar 12]; Available from: https://shorturl.asia/XNktS. (in Thai).
Kitchapan P. Aging society in Thailand. Thai Food and Drug Journal. 2018;25(3):4-8. (in Thai).
Cheewakriangkrai A. Impact of an aging society in Thailand. [internet]. 2017. [cited 2023 Mar 12]; Available from: https://www. bangkokbiznews.com/columnist/116354.(in Thai).
Dale MC, John SS, Hanna J. Financing of long-term care and long-term care insurance for the aged: A literature-based comparison of seven OECD countries. Retirement Policy and Research Centre, Business School, The university of Auckland; 2013.
Grignon M., Bernier NF. Financing long-term care in Canada. IRPP study no.33. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy; 2012.
Nadash P, Doty P, Schwanenflügel MV. The German long-term care insurance program: evolution and recent developments.Gerontologist. 2018;58(3):588-97. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx018.
Kaye HS, Harrington C, LaPlante MP. Long-term care: who gets it, who provides it, who pays, and how much?. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(1):11-21. doi: 10.1377/ hlthaff.2009.0535.
Grabowski DC, O'Malley AJ. Use of telemedicine can reduce hospitalizations of nursing home residents and generate savings for medicare. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33(2):244-50. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff. 2013.0922.
Scheil-Adlung X. Long-term care protection for older persons: a review of coverage deficits in 46 countries. ESS paper series-ESS 50,Geneva: International Labour Office; 2015.
Chin CW, Phua KH. Long-term care policy: Singapore's experience. J Aging Soc Policy. 2016;28(2):113-29. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2016.1145534.
Chanprasert, P. Long-term care policy and implementation in Thailand. In: Komazawa O. and Saito Y, editors. Coping with rapid population ageing in Asia. Jakarta: ERIA; 2021. p.36-44.
Department of Older Person. The registration of elderly allowance. Bangkok: Department of Older Person. [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www.dop.go.th/th/know/13/328. (in Thai).
Japan Fund for Poverty Reduction. Country diagnostic study on long-term care in Thailand [Internet]. Metro Manila: Asian Development Bank; 2020 [ cited 2021 Oct 20]; Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11540/12871.
Mayhew L, Karlsson M, Rickayzen B. The role of private finance in paying for long-term care. Econ J (London). 2010;120(548):F478-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02388.x.
Mot E, Faber R, Geerts J, Willemé P. Performance of long-term care systems in Europe. Southampton: European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes; 2012.ENEPRI Research Report No. 117
Benard M. Policy brief: November 2018. Ensuring quality care for all seniors. Ontario: Canadian Health Coalition. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Oct 20]; Available from: https://www healthcoalition.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ Seniors-care-policy-paper-.pdf
Nagl A, Witte J, Hodek JM, Greiner W. Relationship between multimorbidity and direct healthcare costs in an advanced elderly population: results of the PRISCUS trial. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;45(2):146-54. doi: 10.1007/s00391-011-0266-2.
Davis K, Willink A, Schoen C. Integrated care organizations: medicare financing for care at home. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(11):764-8.
Klinger CA, Howell D, Marshall D, Zakus D, Brazil K, Deber RB. Resource utilization and cost analyses of home-based palliative care service provision: the Niagara West end-of-life Shared-care project. Palliat Med. 2013;27(2):115-22. doi: 10.1177/0269216 311433475.
Saito M, Aida J, Kondo N, Saito J, Kato H, Ota Y, Amemiya A, et al. Reduced long-term care cost by social participation among older Japanese adults: a prospective follow-up study in JAGES. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e024439. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024439.
Graham WCK, Bilger M. Financing long-term services and supports: ideas from Singapore. Milbank Q. 2017;95(2):358-407. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12264.
Steering Committee on the Development of the National Health Development Plan. The twelfth national health development plan(2017-2022) in Ministry of Public Health [internet]. Nonthaburi: Strategy and Planning Division Office of the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Public Health; 2017.[cited 2021 Oct 20]; Available from: http://bps.moph.go.th/new_bps/sites/default/ files/strategymoph61_v10.pdf. (in Thai).
Bumroongsakulsawat O, Banphuan W, Jaroengate W, Kanya Sai S, Wasurat A, Chaisitthiphon, S. et.al. Manual to support the management of the long-term health care system for elderly people with dependent conditions in the national health insurance system [internet]. Bangkok: National Health Security Office (NHSO); 2016. [cited 2021 Oct 20]. Available from: http://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://apps.hpc.go.th/dl/web/upFile/2021/12-10169-20211202135504/e5e20ad8fa1 a725fb1f1cb9792b45126.pdf. (in Thai).