Lyoprotectants for concentration and stability improvement of niosomes

Main Article Content

Buncha Yingngam
Nuttapun Supaka
Wandee Rungseevijitprapa

Abstract

Introduction: Niosomes are promising vehicle for delivery of cosmetic ingredients and usually used as dispersion in emulsions or gel bases prior to skin application. However, the main problem encountered when using niosomes as delivery system is the large amount of water in the formulation resulting in very low concentration of the actives and may not be sufficient to generate efficiency to skin. In this study, appropriated lyoprotectants for enhancing the concentration and improving the stability of niosomes were investigated. Materials and methods: Blank and soybean extract (0.5 %w/v) loaded niosomes were prepared by film hydration method, followed by particle size reduction by high pressure homogenization. The obtained niosomes were subsequently lyophilized to obtain dry product. The investigated factors include weight ratios of lyoprotectant to total lipid content, total lipid concentrations, types of lyoprotectant, and types of non-ionic surfactants. Results: The results showed that lyophilization of niosomes with glucose, mannitol, glycerol, and trehaloise at a weight ratio of 1:3, 1:3, 1:5, and 1:5 were well dispersed with uniformed in their particle sizes after rehydration. Niosomes were also concentrated up to 10X using trehalose, glycerol, and glucose while lower concentration factor was observed! when using mannitol (2X). In contrast, lyophilization of niosomes without lyoprotectant significantly increased particle sizes of all formulations (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Using lyophiliztion with an appropriated lyoprotectant has potential for enhancing the concentration and improving the stability of niosomes.

Article Details

Section
Appendix

References

Chen c, Han D, Cai c, et al. An overview of liposome lyophilization and its future potential. J Controlled Re/2010; 142(3): 299-311.

Crowe JH, Spargo BJ, Crowe LM. Preservation of dry liposomes does not require retention of residual water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84: 1537¬1540.

Guan T, Miao Y, Xu L., et al. Injectable nimodipine-loaded nanoliposomes: preparation, lyophilization and characterization. Int J Pharm 2011; 410(1-2): ISO- 187.

Kim KR, Ahn KY, Park JS, et al. Lyophilization and enhanced stability of fluorescent protein nanoparticles. Biophem Biophys Res Commun 2011; 408(2): 225-229.

Li F, Wang T, He HB, et al. The properties of bufadienolides-loaded nano-emulsion and submicro¬emulsion during lyophilization. Int J Pharm 2008; 349(1-2): 291-299.

Tiyaboonchai W, Tungpradit W, Plianbangchang p.

Formulation and characterization of curcuminoids loaded solid lipid nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2007; 337(1-2): 299-306.

Vauthier c, Cabane B, Labarre D. How to concentrate nanoparticles and avoid aggregation. Eur J Pharm Blopharm 2008; 69(2): 466-475.

Wang T, Wang N, Hao A, et al. Lyophilization of water-in- oil emulsions to prepare phospholipid-based anhydrous reverse micelles for oral peptide delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci 2010; 39(5): 373-379.

Yingngam B, Supaka N, Rungseevijiprapa พ. Efficacy for delaying the loss of skin elasticity of fermented soy extract encapsulated nano-, micro-niosomes and conventional gel. Proceeding of the 3rd North Eastern Pharmacy Conference, 2011 Feb 13-14; Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.

Yingngam B, Supaka N, Rungseevijitprapa W. Influence of vesicle sizes on skin permeation of dual flavonoids loaded niosomes. Proceeding of the Pure and Apply Chemistry Organic Conference, 2010 Jan 21-23; Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.

Zillies JC, Zwiorek K, Hoffman F, et al. Formulation development of freeze-dried oligonucleotide-loaded gelatin nanoparticles.. Eur J Pharm Blopharm 2008; 70(2): 514-521.