การประเมินโครงการฝึกอบรมการพัฒนางานประจำสู่งานวิจัยสำหรับพยาบาลวิชาชีพในองค์กรบริหารการพยาบาล : การวิจัยเชิงประเมินแบบผสมวิธี

Teepatad Chintapanyakun; Somporn Poolpanitoopatum; Chiraphi  Soonthornkul Na Cholburi

Authors

Teepatad Chintapanyakun Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Somporn Poolpanitoopatum Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Chiraphi Soonthornkul Na Cholburi Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Keywords:

program evaluation, routine to research for nursing, mixed-methods evaluation research

Abstract

This mixed-methods evaluation research aimed to evaluate the training program on the development of routine to research (R2R) for registered nurses in nursing service organizations and to study determining guidance for the development program. Ninety-five registered nurses with trained R2R programs and ten key informants were recruited using purposive selection techniques from Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University. The research instruments consisted of two sets: 1) the assessment questionnaire for the training program (input, process, output, and impact) with content validity ranging from .60 to 1.00 and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient reliability ranging from .81 to .89, and 2) an interview form used to interview registered nurses with trained R2R programs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

The results showed that: 1) in evaluating the input, process, output, and impact, all aspects were rated as appropriate at a high level and 2) the guidance for the development program of R2R for registered nurses to enhance efficiency and effectiveness included establishing a research clinic, providing nurse mentors with knowledge and capabilities in nursing research, enhancing positive reinforcement skills, and ensuring continuity of progressive evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chaikongkiat, P., & Kumkong, M. (2017). Routine to research: Driving to utilization. The Southern College Network Journal of Nursing and Public Health, 4(3), 259-270.

Chintapanyakun, T. (2019). Development of a program for enhancing research-practice nexus in clinical nursing using ICT-based learning: Design research (Doctoral dissertation). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Chintapanyakun, T., & Peanpedlerd, S. (2017). An evaluation of the training program on development of potential competency in new registered nurse under mentoring system by CIPPIEST model. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 9(1),

-371.

Chintapanyakun, T., Wongwanich, S., & Kaemkate, W. (2020). A clinical research-practice nexus as perceived by nurses: Needs assessment research. Journal of The Police Nurses, 12(2), 251-264.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Harnlakorn, P., Juangpanich, U., Mongkolthawolchai, S., Toimamuang, U., & Thienthong, S. (2016). A survey of the routine to research and research utilization in nursing division Srinagarind hospital. Srinagarind Medical Journal, 31(4), 218-223.

Mertens, D. (2018). Mixed methods design in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Nimmannit, A., Nopmaneejumruslers, C., Thephamongkhol, K., Ngarmtipvatana, S., & Suwan, L. (2010). Routine to research: from the beginning until today. Journal of Health Systems Research, 4(4), 575-577.

Panich, V. (2011). Networks to extend values of routine to research. Journal of Health Systems Research, 5(3), 392-397.

Pitiyanuwat, S. (2016). Methodology of evaluation: Value science (6th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Srikanok, W., & Untaja, P. (2014). Nursing intervention: Routine to research. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses, 15(2), 15-22.

Srisasalux, J. (2009). Routine to research in health system. Journal of Health Systems Research, 3(3), 465-468.

Srisasalux, J. (2017). Roles of health systems research institute to extension R2R to policy. Bangkok: Health Systems Research Institute.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation: Theory, models and applications (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation: Theory, models and applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sukawattana, S., Lavin, W., & Poolpanitoopatum, S. (2020). A Comparative study of differences of selected factors between groups of master’s degree nurses with and without research. Journal of Nursing Science & Health, 43(4), 135-145.

Tashakkori, A. M., Johnson, R. B., & Teddlie, C. B. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). California, CA: Sage.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Theinsri, T., & Oumtanee, A. (2020). Developing a routine to research: Voices of professional nurses and key stakeholders. Royal Thai Navy Medical Journal, 47(1), 20-36.

Wongwanich, S. (2016). Research methodology in education: Provocation of new ideas. Bangkok: Icon printing.

Wongwanich, S. (2021). Design research in education. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Wongwanich, S., & Khaikleng, P. (2020). Text book of evaluation. Bangkok: Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University.