DEVELOPMENT OF THE CLINICAL JUDGEMENT TEST IN OBSTETRIC NURSING FOR NURSING STUDENTS

Main Article Content

ปาริชาติ สุขสวัสดิพร
โชติกา ภาษีผล
ใจทิพย์ ณ สงขลา

Abstract

           The purposes of this research were to develop and verify the quality of the test of clinical judgement in obstetric nursing for nursing students. The samples were 260 fourth year nursing students. The research instruments were clinical simulation problem and clinical skill in obstetric nursing opened-end questionnaires.


           The research findings were the clinical judgement test was developed having 3 situations included antepartum, peripartum and postpartum period. It consisted of 33 items. Each situation consisted of 11 items included multiple choices and rating scale items were used to assess 11 indicators of clinical judgement. The 27 multiple choice items assessed indicators number 1 to 9 including focused observation, recognizing deviations from expected patterns, information seeking, prioritizing data, summarizing the problem issue, well-planned intervention, being skillful, clear communication, and calm & confident manner. The 6 items of self-assessment rating scale was used to assess the indicators number 10 to 11 including self-analysis and self-evaluation and commitment to improvement. The result of the quality analysis of the test showed that 31 items had a good discrimination and a threshold parameter of each the list to be the arrange beta3 > beta2 > beta1. The 2 items which need to be adjusted were the item used to assess communication skill in dystocia situation and problem analysis in postpartum hemorrhage situation. The internal consistency of the test was .70 and there was a construct validity proved by second order confirmatory factor analysis, which had Chi-square (df = 41) = 39.35, p = .544, GFI = .97, AGFI = .96, RMR = .04, RMSEA = .000.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research (บทความวิจัย)

References

Alfaro-LeFevre, R. (2013). Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment: A practical approach (5th ed.). St. Louis: Saunders.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Retrieved from https://www.aacn.nche.edu/Education/pdf/BEdraft.pdf

Gerdeman, J. L., Lux, K., & Jacko, J. (2013). Using concept mapping to build clinical judgment skills. Nursing Education in Practice, 13, 11-17.

Hair, J., Black W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Johnson, E. A., Lasater, K., Hodson-Carlton, K., Siktberg, L., Sideras, S., & Dillard, N. (2012). Geriatrics in simulation: Role modeling and clinical judgment effect. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(3), 176-180.

Kanjanawasee, S. (2012). Modern test theory (4th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Kanjanawasee, S. (2013). Classical test theory (7th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Lasater, K., & Nielsen, A. (2009). Reflective journaling for clinical judgment development and evaluation. Educational Innovations, 48(1), 40-44.

Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), 496-503.

Lindsey, P. L., & Jenkins, S. (2013). Nursing students, clinical judgment regarding rapid response: The influence of a clinical simulation education intervention. Nursing Forum, 48(1), 61-70.

Mann, J. W. (2010). Promoting curriculum choices: Critical thinking and clinical judgment skill development in baccalaureate nursing students. University of Kansas, Ann Arbor. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.

Shin, H., Park, C. G., & Shim, K. (2015). The Korean version of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric: A validation study. Nurse Education Today, 35, 68-72.

Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204-211.