Immobilization Devices for Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer: The Role of Radiation Therapists

Authors

  • Metinee Wisetrintong Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorials Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society
  • Nuttawut Mafoo Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorials Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society
  • Yupawadee Chotmit Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorials Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society
  • Jaruek Kanphet Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorials Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society

Keywords:

Proton Therapy, Immobilization, Head and Neck Cancer, Salvage radiotherapy, Bragg Peak

Abstract

Head and neck cancers present significant therapeutic challenges in radiation oncology due to the proximity of multiple radiosensitive organs and critical structures. Proton therapy has emerged as a specialized technique to minimize unintended doses to surrounding normal tissues, leveraging the physical properties of the Bragg peak to achieve maximal dose deposition at a precise depth. However, the therapeutic advantages of proton therapy are strictly dependent on highly accurate and reproducible patient immobilization. This review highlights the clinical importance of immobilization in proton therapy for head and neck malignancies and describes the essential roles of radiation therapists in device preparation and treatment simulation. By examining the technical processes of patient positioning and the utilization of various immobilization systems—including thermoplastic masks, specialized head and neck cushions (e.g., cushions), bite blocks, and related supportive accessories—this article summarizes a CT simulation workflow based on clinical experience and evidence from relevant literature. Effective immobilization is shown to reduce patient motion and breathing-induced variations, thereby minimizing range uncertainty and ensuring positional reproducibility across the entire treatment course. Furthermore, appropriate immobilization strategies decrease radiation exposure to organs at risk, directly enhancing the precision and safety of proton therapy. Consequently, the selection of appropriate devices, combined with the meticulous technical practice of skilled radiation therapists, remains a cornerstone of treatment accuracy and patient safety in this complex anatomical region.

References

Chang JY, Zhang X, Wang X, Kang Y, Riley B, Bilton SD, et al. Significant reduction of normal tissue dose by proton radiotherapy compared with three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy in stage I or stage III non–small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65:1087–96.

Yoon M, Shin DH, Park SY, Lee SB, Shin KH, Kim DY, et al. Comparison of treatment plans between IMRT and proton therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:68.

Chang CL, Lin KC, Chen WM, Shia BC, Wu SY. Comparing the Oncologic Outcomes of Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14:5262.

Paganetti H. Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57: R99–117.

Goitein M, Cox JD. Should randomized clinical trials be required for proton radiotherapy? J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26:175–6.

Engelsman M, Schwarz M, Dong L. Physics controversies in proton therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2013; 23:88–96.

Moyers MF, Miller DW, Bush DA, Slater JD. Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 49:1429–38.

Lomax AJ. Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 1999; 44:185–205.

Schreuder N, Shirato H, Shimizu S, Kagei K, Onimaru R, Khin Khin T, et al. Immobilization for proton radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2020; 10:890.

Yao M, Dornfeld KJ, Buatti JM, Skwarchuk M, Tan H, Nguyen T, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation treatment for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma—the University of Iowa experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63:410–21.

Tsai CJ, Stieb S, Zou W, Shih HA, Bortfeld T. Patient positioning and immobilization in proton therapy. Br J Radiol. 2020; 93:20190378.

Kapanen M, Laaksomaa M, Tulijoki T, Peltola S, Hyödynmaa S, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, et al. Effects of individual head supports on the reproducibility of patient positioning in head and neck radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013; 107:199–203.

Halkett GKB, O’Connor M, Aranda S, Jefford M, Lobb EA, Botti M, et al. RT Prepare: a radiation therapist-delivered intervention reduces psychological distress in women with breast cancer referred for radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;127:128–35

Rossetti A, Chadha M, Reiner M, Sacks S, Sacks R, Turkanis M, et al. The effect of music therapy on anxiety and comfort in patients undergoing radiotherapy simulation. J Radiat Res. 2017; 58:756–62.

Bae I, Lim HM, Kim YJ, Kang J, Lee J, Kim S, et al. Music interventions for patients with cancer during radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18: E99–105.

Klarity Medical. Instruction for use [Internet]. Newark (OH): Klarity Medical; [cited 2022]. Available from: https://www.klaritymedical.com

van Kranen S, van Beek S, Rasch C, van Herk M, Sonke JJ. Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92(2):291–295.

CIVCO Radiotherapy. Thermoplastics Reference Guide [Internet]. Orange City (IA): CIVCO Radiotherapy; [cited 2022]. Available from: https://www.civcort.com

Klarity Medical. How to mold Klarity Head AccuCushion. Newark (OH): Klarity Medical; 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-14

How to Cite

1.
Wisetrintong M, Mafoo N, Chotmit Y, Kanphet J. Immobilization Devices for Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer: The Role of Radiation Therapists. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [internet]. 2026 May 14 [cited 2026 May 25];32(1):Q1-Q15. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/283056

Issue

Section

Review articles