Proton Therapy Machine Quality Assurance: An Institutional Experience

Authors

  • Sornjarod Oonsiri Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society
  • Puntiwa Oonsiri Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society

Keywords:

Quality assurance, Proton therapy, QA tools

Abstract

Proton therapy quality assurance (QA) is an important process to ensure that the patient’s treatment is accurate. There are daily, monthly, and annual QAs. This article explored experience and QA tool usage for the QA process: Sphinx Compact for daily QA, Logos system XRV-124 for monthly QA, and MP3-PL combined with PTW Bragg peak chamber type 34070 for annual QA, respectively. It could help to give the idea for the staff, which supports the new facility’s planning in the future.

References

Fang KC, Lee CH, Chuang HC, Huang TL, Chien CY, Tsai WL, et al. Acute radiation dermatitis among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with proton beam therapy: Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes. Int Wound J. 2023;20:499-507.

Arjomandy B, Taylor P, Ainsley C, Safai S, Sahoo N, Pankuch M, et al. AAPM task group 224: comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance. Med Phys. 2019;46:e678-e705.

ศิริญญา เรืองชาญ. การรักษาด้วยอนุภาค ใน: ศิวลี สุริยาปี, ทวีป แสงแห่งธรรม, พันทิวา อุณห์ศิริ, บรรณาธิการ ฟิสิกส์ทางรังสีรักษา พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. กรุงเทพมหานคร: อิมเมนซ เกรซ; 2563. หน้า 215-28.

Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin FF, Simon W, Dresser S, et al. Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators a. Med Phys. 2009;36:4197-212.

Bissonnette JP, Balter PA, Dong L, Langen KM, Lovelock DM, Miften M, et al. Quality assurance for image‐guided radiation therapy utilizing CT‐based technologies: a report of the AAPM TG‐179. Med Phys. 2012;39:1946-63.

Ding X, Zheng Y, Zeidan O, Mascia A, Hsi W, Kang Y, et al. A novel daily QA system for proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14:115-26.

Kry SF, Jones J, Childress NL. Implementation and evaluation of an end-to‐end IGRT test. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13:46-53.

Keall PJ, Mageras GS, Balter JM, Emery RS, Forster KM, Jiang SB, et al. The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76 a. Med Phys. 2006;33:3874-900.

Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998;25:656-61.

Nichiporov D, Klyachko A, Solberg K, Zhao Q. Performance characteristics and long-term calibration stability of a beam monitor for a proton scanning gantry. Radiat Meas. 2011;46:244-9.

Bissonnette J-P, Moseley D, White E, Sharpe M, Purdie T, Jaffray DA. Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:S57-S61.

Wang N, Ghebremedhin A, Patyal B. Commissioning of a proton gantry equipped with dual x‐ray imagers and a robotic patient positioner, and evaluation of the accuracy of single‐beam image registration for this system. Med Phys. 2015;42:2979-91.

Andreo P, Burns D, Hohlfeld K, Huq MS, Kanai T, Laitano F, et al. IAEA TRS-398 Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An International code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. International Atomic Energy Agency. 2000;18:35-6.

Arjomandy B, Sahoo N, Ding X, Gillin M. Use of a two‐dimensional ionization chamber array for proton therapy beam quality assurance. Med Phys. 2008;35:3889-94.

Boon S, Van Luijk P, Schippers J, Meertens H, Denis J, Vynckier S, et al. Fast 2D phantom dosimetry for scanning proton beams. Med Phys. 1998;25:464-75.

Thasasi P, Ruangchan S, Oonsiri P, Oonsiri S. Determination of Integral Depth Dose in Proton Pencil Beam Using Plane-parallel Ionization Chambers. Int J Part Ther. 2022;9:1-9.

Cai W, Oesten H, Clasie B, Winey B, Jee K-W. Semi-automated IGRT QA using a cone-shaped scintillator screen detector for proton pencil beam scanning treatments. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:085004.

Grevillot L, Moreno JO, Fuchs H, Dreindl R, Elia A, Bolsa‐Ferruz M, et al. Implementation of Sphinx/Lynx as daily QA equipment for scanned proton and carbon ion beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023;24:e13896-909.

Su Z, Hsi W, Forthomme J, Rossoมม.e S. Evaluations of a flat-panel based compact daily quality assurance device for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) system. Phys Med. 2020;80:243-50.

Tiajaroen Tanapat. Baselines of daily quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning using the Sphinx Compact. Chulalongkorn University Theses and Dissertations (Chula ETD) [online]. 2021[16 Jul 24]; 20-4, Available from: https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/4799.

Lambert J, B€aumer C, Koska B, Ding X. Daily QA in proton therapy using a single commercially available detector. J Appl Clin Med Phys.2014;15:217–28.

Bizzocchi N, Fracchiolla F, Schwarz M, Algranati C. A fast and reliable method for daily quality assurance in spot scanning proton therapy with a compact and inexpensive phantom. Med Dosim.2017;42:238–46.

Ates O, Faught J, Pirlepesov F, Sobczak D, Hua C-h, Merchant TE. Novel Monthly Quality Assurance Regimen and 5-Year Analysis Using a Proton Metrology System. Int J Part Ther. 2023;10:111-7.

Vai A, Mirandola A, Magro G, Maestri D, Mastella E, Mairani A, et al. Characterization of a MLIC detector for QA in scanned proton and carbon ion beams. Int J Part Ther. 2019;6:50-9.

Bäumer C, Koska B, Lambert J, Tiมม.ermann B, Mertens T, Talla PT. Evaluation of detectors for acquisition of pristine depth‐dose curves in pencil beam scanning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16:151-63.

Farr JB, Moyers MF, Allgower CE, Bues M, Hsi WC, Jin H, et al. Clinical commissioning of intensity‐modulated proton therapy systems: report of AAPM Task Group 185. Med Phys. 2021;48:e1-e30.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-04

How to Cite

1.
Oonsiri S, Oonsiri P. Proton Therapy Machine Quality Assurance: An Institutional Experience. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [internet]. 2025 Mar. 4 [cited 2025 Mar. 30];31(1):O1-O21. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/272856

Issue

Section

Review articles