Predicting patient body weight and volumes changes using machine learning for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy

Authors

  • Phawadee Supreeyaporn Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy
  • Chirasak Khamfongkhruea Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy
  • Sasikarn Chamchod Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy
  • Thitiwan Prachanukul Radiation Oncology Department, Chulabhorn hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy
  • Sawanee Suntiwong Radiation Oncology Department, Chulabhorn hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy
  • Todsaporn Fuangrod Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy

Keywords:

Adaptive radiation therapy (ART), Head and neck cancer (HNC), Machine learning (ML), Patient anatomical change

Abstract

Background: Patient anatomical change is the most challenging aspect of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with adaptive radiotherapy (ART) techniques. These can lead to dosimetric deviations and result in an increase in severe radiation toxicity.

Objectives: To use machine learning (ML) in predicting anatomical changes and indicating the optimal time to modify plans in HNC patients for decision-making.

Materials and methods: Volumes of interest (VOI) of 183 Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image datasets were defined based on planning Computed tomography (CT) images. The percentage of body weight (BW), Gross target volume (GTV), Clinical target volume (CTV)70, CTV59.4, Planning target volume (PTV)70, PTV59.4, left parotid gland (PG), and right PG volume changes were retrieved. 143 datasets (78.14%) were applied for training with various ML algorithms; support vector machines (SVMs), kernel approximation regression (KAR), gaussian process regression, Ensembles of trees (ETs), linear regression (LR), regression trees (RTs), and neural networks (NNs). Five and ten-fold cross-validation techniques were applied to select the best prediction model for each specific target. The selected model accuracy for a specific target was tested using the blind testing data set (40 plans or 21.86%) using root mean square error (RMSE) and R-square value (R2).

Results: The selected prediction model (k-fold cross validation, RMSE and R2) were RTs (5-fold, 4.10, 0.49), SVMs (5-fold, 7.40, 0.26), SVMs (5-fold, 5.74, 0.27), GPR (5-fold, 4.88, 0.13), SVMs (5-fold, 5.30, -0.04), ETs (5-fold, 3.19, 0.37), ETs (5-fold, 11.56, 0.57), and RTs (5-fold, 8.31, 0.7), respectively. The system generated the predicted data after the first 11th fractions.

Conclusion: This ML-based patient anatomical change model can provide useful information, which could benefit decision-making in treatment plan modification for HN-ART.

Author Biographies

Phawadee Supreeyaporn, Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy

 

 

 

Chirasak Khamfongkhruea, Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy

 

 

 

Sasikarn Chamchod , Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy

 

 

Thitiwan Prachanukul , Radiation Oncology Department, Chulabhorn hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy

 

 

 

Sawanee Suntiwong, Radiation Oncology Department, Chulabhorn hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy

 

 

Todsaporn Fuangrod , Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy

 

 

 

References

Arora A, Purohit R, chigurupalli K, Bhandari M, Gupta A, Peter S. Comparison of Sequential Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Boost Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Treatment of Head and Neck Carcinoma: A Prospective Interventional Study. JCDR 2022; 16: 1-5.

Dahele M, Tol JP, Vergeer MR, Jansen F, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Leemans CR, et al. Is the introduction of more advanced radiotherapy techniques for locally-advanced head and neck cancer associated with improved quality of life and reduced symptom burden? Radiother Oncol 2020;151:298–303.

Cilla S, Deodato F, Macchia G, Digesù C, Ianiro A, Piermattei A, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and simultaneous integrated boost in head-and-neck cancer: is there a place for critical swallowing structures dose sparing? Br J Radiol 2016;89: 1-10.

Gros SAA, Xu W, Roeske JC, Choi M, Emami B, Surucu M. A novel surrogate to identify anatomical changes during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients. Med Phys 2017;44:924–34.

Noble DJ, Yeap P-L, Seah SYK, Harrison K, Shelley LEA, Romanchikova M, et al. Anatomical change during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, and its effect on delivered dose to the spinal cord. Radiother Oncol 2019;130:32–8.

Rozendaal RA, Mijnheer BJ, Hamming-Vrieze O, Mans A, van Herk M. Impact of daily anatomical changes on EPID-based in vivo dosimetry of VMAT treatments of head-and-neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015;116:70–4.

Moncharmont C, Vallard A, Mengue Ndong S, Guy J-B, Saget C, Méry B, et al. Real-life assessment of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) toxicity in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2016;136:181–8.

Wang H, Xue J, Chen T, Qu T, Barbee D, Tam M, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy based on statistical process control for oropharyngeal cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020;21:171–7.

Sun L, Kirkby C, Smith W. Dosimetric effect of body contour changes for prostate and head and neck volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019;20:115–24.

Belshaw L, Agnew CE, Irvine DM, Rooney KP, McGarry CK. Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer reduces the requirement for rescans during treatment due to spinal cord dose. Radiat Oncol 2019;14:189-195.

Chibane BI, Benrachi F, Salah Bali M. Adaptive approach for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients during Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy treatment (VMAT). Int J Radiat Res 2020;18:369–74.

van Beek S, Jonker M, Hamming-Vrieze O, Al-Mamgani A, Navran A, Remeijer P, et al. Protocolised way to cope with anatomical changes in head & neck cancer during the course of radiotherapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2019;12:34–40.

Alexander KM, Gooding J, Schreiner LJ, Olding T. Clinical management of tumour volume changes in VMAT head & neck radiation treatment. J Phys: Conf Ser 2017;847:1-5.

Navran A, Heemsbergen W, Janssen T, Hamming-Vrieze O, Jonker M, Zuur C, et al. The impact of margin reduction on outcome and toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Radiother Oncol 2019;130:25–31.

Green OL, Henke LE, Hugo GD. Practical Clinical Workflows for Online and Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2019;29:219–27.

Gros SAA, Santhanam AP, Block AM, Emami B, Lee BH, Joyce C. Retrospective clinical evaluation of a decision-support software for adaptive radiotherapy of Head & Neck cancer patients. Front Oncol 2022;12:1-20.

Lim SB, Tsai CJ, Yu Y, Greer P, Fuangrod T, Hwang K, et al. Investigation of a Novel Decision Support Metric for Head and Neck Adaptive Radiation Therapy Using a Real-Time In Vivo Portal Dosimetry System. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019;18:1-6.

Lim SB, Lee N, Zakeri K, Greer P, Fuangrod T, Coffman F, et al. Can the Risk of Dysphagia in Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Be Predicted by an Automated Transit Fluence Monitoring Process During Treatment? A First Comparative Study of Patient Reported Quality of Life and the Fluence-Based Decision Support Metric. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2021; 20: 1-7.

Castelli J, Simon A, Lafond C, Perichon N, Rigaud B, Chajon E, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Acta Oncologica 2018;57:1284–92.

Dewan A, Sharma S, Dewan A, Srivastava H, Rawat S, Kakria A, et al. Impact of Adaptive Radiotherapy on Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer - A Dosimetric and Volumetric Study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016;17:985–92.

Brown E, Owen R, Harden F, Mengersen K, Oestreich K, Houghton W, et al. Predicting the need for adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer Radiother Oncol 2015;116:57–63.

Brown E, Owen R, Harden F, Mengersen K, Oestreich K, Houghton W, et al. Head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: Predicting the time to replan. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2016;12:460–7.

Tanooka M, Doi H, Ishida T, Kitajima K, Wakayama T, Sakai T, et al. Usability of Deformable Image Registration for Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer and an Automatic Prediction of Replanning. IJMPCERO 2017;06:10–20.

Morgan HE, Sher DJ. Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Cancers Head Neck 2020;5:1-16.

Zhang P, Simon A, Rigaud B, Castelli J, Ospina Arango JD, Nassef M, et al. Optimal adaptive IMRT strategy to spare the parotid glands in oropharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2016;120:41–7.

Kearney M, Coffey M, Leong A. A review of Image Guided Radiation Therapy in head and neck cancer from 2009–2019 – Best Practice Recommendations for RTTs in the Clinic. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2020;14:43–50.

Cheng CS, Jong WL, Ung NM, Wong JHD. Evaluation of Imaging Dose From Different Image Guided Systems During Head and Neck Radiotherapy: A Phantom Study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017;175:357–62.

Jarrett D, Stride E, Vallis K, Gooding MJ. Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology. Br J Radiol 2019;92:1-12.

Barragán-Montero A, Javaid U, Valdés G, Nguyen D, Desbordes P, Macq B, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review. Phys Med 2021;83:242–56.

Deig CR, Kanwar A, Thompson RF. Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Oncology. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2019;33:1095–104.

Sheng K. Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy: a technological review. Front Med 2020;14:431–49.

Siddique S, Chow JCL. Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020;25:656–66.

Giraud P, Giraud P, Gasnier A, El Ayachy R, Kreps S, Foy J-P, et al. Radiomics and Machine Learning for Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancers. Front Oncol 2019;9:174-186.

Marzi S, Pinnarò P, D’Alessio D, Strigari L, Bruzzaniti V, Giordano C, et al. Anatomical and Dose Changes of Gross Tumour Volume and Parotid Glands for Head and Neck Cancer Patients during Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy: Effect on the Probability of Xerostomia Incidence. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2012;24:e54-62.

Langius JAE, Twisk J, Kampman M, Doornaert P, Kramer MHH, Weijs PJM, et al. Prediction model to predict critical weight loss in patients with head and neck cancer during (chemo)radiotherapy. Oral Oncol 2016;52:91–96.

Pandit P, Patil R, Palwe V, Yasam VR, Nagarkar R. Predictors of Weight Loss in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Radiation or Concurrent Chemoradiation Treated at a Tertiary Cancer Center. Nutr Clin Pract 2020;35:1047–52.

Lee D, Zhang P, Nadeem S, Alam S, Jiang J, Caringi A, et al. Predictive Dose Accumulation for HN Adaptive Radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2020;65:1-27.

Pukala J, Johnson PB, Shah AP, Langen KM, Bova FJ, Staton RJ, et al. Benchmarking of five commercial deformable image registration algorithms for head and neck patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2016;17:25–40.

Hvid CA, Elstrøm UV, Jensen K, Alber M, Grau C. Accuracy of software-assisted contour propagation from planning CT to cone beam CT in head and neck radiotherapy. Acta Oncologica 2016;55:1324–30.

La Macchia M, Fellin F, Amichetti M, Cianchetti M, Gianolini S, Paola V, et al. Systematic evaluation of three different commercial software solutions for automatic segmentation for adaptive therapy in head-and-neck, prostate and pleural cancer. Radiat Oncol 2012;7:160-175.

Raju MP, Laxmi AJ. IOT based Online Load Forecasting using Machine Learning Algorithms. Procedia Comput Sci 2020;171:551–60.

Kapoor NR, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar A, Mohammed MA, Kumar K, et al. Machine Learning-Based CO2 Prediction for Office Room: A Pilot Study. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2022;2022: 1-16.

Barker JL, Garden AS, Ang KK, O’Daniel JC, Wang H, Court LE, et al. Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:960–70.

Bak B, Skrobala A, Adamska A, Kazmierska J, Jozefacka N, Piotrowski T, et al. Criteria for Verification and Replanning Based on the Adaptive Radiotherapy Protocol “Best for Adaptive Radiotherapy” in Head and Neck Cancer. Life (Basel) 2022;12:722-735.

Bhide SA, Davies M, Burke K, McNair HA, Hansen V, Barbachano Y, et al. Weekly Volume and Dosimetric Changes During Chemoradiotherapy With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:1360–8.

Yao W-R, Xu S-P, Liu B, Cao X-T, Ren G, Du L, et al. Replanning Criteria and Timing Definition for Parotid Protection-Based Adaptive Radiation Therapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:1-9.

Li J, Xia T, Yang X, Dong X, Liang J, Zhong N, et al. Malignant solitary pulmonary nodules: assessment of mass growth rate and doubling time at follow-up CT. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:S797–806.

Coca-Pelaz A, Takes RP, Hutcheson K, Saba NF, Haigentz M, Bradford CR, et al. Head and Neck Cancer: A Review of the Impact of Treatment Delay on Outcome. Adv Ther 2018;35:153–60.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-12

How to Cite

1.
Supreeyaporn P, Khamfongkhruea C, Chamchod S, Prachanukul T, Suntiwong S, Fuangrod T. Predicting patient body weight and volumes changes using machine learning for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 12 [cited 2024 May 11];29(1):R67-R88. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/259736

Issue

Section

Original articles