Organ Motion during Beam Delivery Detected by CyberKnife System in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Authors

  • Rawee Ruangkanchanasetr Department of Radiology, Faculty of medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Mantana Dhanachai Department of Radiology, Faculty of medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Somjai Dangprasetr Department of Radiology, Faculty of medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Putipan Puataweepong Department of Radiology, Faculty of medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Pornpan Yongvithisatid Radiosurgerycenter, Faculty of medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Prasert Assavaprathuangkul Radiosurgerycenter, Faculty of medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Kanjana Boonpitak Radiosurgerycenter, Faculty of medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Keywords:

Stereotactic body radiation therapy, CyberKnife, Organ motion

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate organ motion detected by CyberKnife system during Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and to study the factors affecting errors during SBRT by the CyberKnife system

Materials and Methods: 31 patients (41 lesions, total 174 fractions) with lung, upper abdominal, lower abdominal or spine tumors were treated with CyberKnife system. Errors in all 6 directions were recorded in the system in graph form. Errors that exceeded the threshold limit of the system were recorded in our data collection form.

Results: Spine and rectum patients had median maximum delta error of 1.5-2.5 mm and median maximum error in all 3 rotational directions of 1-2 degree. Lung, liver, prostate and cervix patients had median maximum delta error of 3.0-3.8 mm and median maximum error in some rotational directions in excess of 5 degree except in cervix patients. 

Conclusion: The spinal and rectal patients had lower magnitude of error than the lung, liver, prostate and cervix patients. The data of median of maximum movement in each axis of each organ group might be beneficial in determining the safety margin for organ motion in treating cancer of that organ group.

References

1. Adler JR, Murphy MJ, Chang SD, Hancock SL. Image-guided robotic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1999;44:1299-1306.

2. Ho AK, Fu D, Cotrutz C, Hancock SL, Chang SD, Gibbs SD, et al. A study of the accuracy of CyberKnife spinal radiosurgery using skeletal structure tracking. Neurosurgery 2007;60:147-156

3. Ozhasoglu C, Saw CB, Chen H, Burton S, Komanduri K, Yue NJ, et al. Synchrony – CyberKnife respiratory compensation technology. Med Dosim.2008 summer;33:117-123

4. Ahmad R, Hoogeman MS, Bonda M, Dhawtal V, Quint S, Pree ID. Increasing treatment accuracy for cervical can-cer patients using correlations between bladder-Filling change and cervix-uterus displacement: Proof of principle. Radio Onco 2011;98:340-346

5. Shirato H, Shimizu S, Kunieda T, Kitamura K, Herk MV, Kagei K, et al. Physical aspects of a real-time tumor-tracking system for gated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:1187-1195.

6. Shimizu S, Shirato H, Kitamura K, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Tsukamoto T, et al. Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:1591-1597.

7. Balter JM, Sandler HM, Lam K, Bree RL, Lichter AS, Haken RKT. Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phy 1995;31:113-118.

8. Franks KN, Purdie TG, Bezjak A, Moseley D, Pearson S, Jaffray DA, et al. Quantifying Inter and Intra-Fraction Tumor Motion using Respiration-Correlated Cone Beam CT Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:S489-490

9. Guckenberger M, Meyer J, Wilbert J, Richter A, Baier K, Mueller G, et al. Intra-fractional uncertainties in cone-beam CT based image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of pulmonary tumors. Radio Onco 2007;83:57-64

10. Olivier K, Chung H, Jin H, Yang H, Kim S. Intra-Fraction Patient Displacement During Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (IGSBRT) for Lung Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;66:S489

11. Case RB, Sonke JJ, Moseley DJ, Kim J, Brock KK, and Laura D. Inter- and Intrafraction Varibility in Liver Position in Non–Breath-Hold Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75:302-308

12. Kitamura K, Shirato H, Seppenwoolde Y, Onimaru R, Oda M, Fujita K, et al. Three-Dimensional Intrafractional Move-ment of Prostate Measured during Real-Time Tumor-Tracking Radiotherapy In Supine and Prone Treatment Posi-tions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;53:1117-1123

13. Willoughby TR, Kupelian PA, Pouliot J, Shinohara K, Aubin M, Roach M, et al. Target Localization and Real-Time Tracking Using the Calypso 4D Localization System in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:528-534

14. Hsi RA, Vali F, Parsai H, Garver E, MadsenB, Pham1 H, et al. Evaluation of Interfraction and Intrafraction Prostate Motion during the Treatment of Prostate Cancer using the Calypso 4D Localization System. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:S300

15. Lijun MA, Sahgal A, Hossain S, Chuang C, Descovich M, Haung K, et al. Nonrandom intrafraction target motions and general strategy for correction of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;4:1261-1265.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-06

How to Cite

1.
Ruangkanchanasetr R, Dhanachai M, Dangprasetr S, Puataweepong P, Yongvithisatid P, Assavaprathuangkul P, Boonpitak K. Organ Motion during Beam Delivery Detected by CyberKnife System in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2019 Nov. 6 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];20(1):14-21. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/224285

Issue

Section

Original articles