RADIATION DOSE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE TWO TECHNIQUES OF INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY IN CERVICAL CANCER

Authors

  • Kanokpis Bhumiwatn Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
  • Imjai Chitapanarux Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
  • Vicharn Lorvidhaya Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
  • Pimkhuan Kamnerdsupaphon Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
  • Ekkasit Tharavichitkul Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
  • Vimol Sukthomya Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University

Abstract

Background and purpose: Radiotherapy is effective in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the treatment is associated with significant morbidity of the urinary bladder and rectum. This study has been designed to ascertain the potential for dose reduction to bladder and rectal points by using intravaginal foley balloon catheters as a mechanism for structural displacement during tandem and ovoid in high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy of the uterine cervix. Materials and Methods: Twenty four patients of cervical carcinoma stage IIB-IIIB, were received four times of 600 cGy high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy(ICBT) treatment. Two times of ICBT with conventional gauze packing (control arm) were compared with two times of ICBT with two foley balloons placed intravaginally(study arm), one balloon was placed anterior and another balloon was placed posterior to the tandem, as close to the flange as patient geometry allowed. A series of 96 consecutive digitized treatment plans was assessed: 48 plans with control arm and 48 plans of study arm. Planning orthogonal X-rays were acquired and digitized. Dose reference points of bladder and rectum were calculated following ICRU No. 38 guideline, both with control and study arm. We compared the rectal dose and bladder dose between conventional gauze packing and foley balloon catheters Results: The Foleys balloon catheter significantly reduced the bladder point dose comparing with conventional gauze packing from 77.87% to 69.83% (p=0.008). There was no difference in rectal point dose between the conventional gauze packing and the foley balloon catheter respectively (58.65% and 58.39%; p=0.561). Conclusion: A significant reduction in radiation dose to the bladder can be achieved by intravaginal insertion of the foley balloon catheters. This technique is simple, consistent and reproducible within an acceptable range. As such, further exploration of this technique is warranted.

References

Bradley KA, Petereit DG. Radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2006;20(2):347-61.

Perez CA, Camel HM, Walz BJ et al, Radiation therapy alone treatment of carcinoma : A 20 year experience. Gynecol Onco 1986;23:127-40.

Kim RY. Radiotherapeutic management in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: GOG experience. Yonsei Med J 1992;33:97-103.

Orton CG. High dose rate brachytherapy may be radiobiologically superior to low dose rate due to slow repair of late responding normal tissue cell. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;49:183-9.

Lorvidhaya V, Tonusin A, Changwiwit W, Chitapanarux I, et al. High-dose-rate afterloading brachytherapy in carcinoma of the cervix: an experience of 1992 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000 Mar 15;46(5):1185-91.

Stryker JA, Bartholomew M, Velkley DE, Cunningham DE, et al. Bladder and rectal complications following radiotherapy for cervix cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1988 Jan;29(1):1-11.

Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Lockett MA, Chao KS, et al. Radiaiton therapy morbidity in carcinoma of uterine cervix dosimetric and clinical correlation. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47:955-61.

Clark BG, Souhami L, Roman TN, Chappell R, et al. The prediction of late rectal complications in patients treated with high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of cervix. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 1997;38:989-93.

Chen SW, Liang JA, Yang SN, Liu RT, et al. The prediction of late rectal complication following the treatment of uterine cervix cancer by high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47:955-61.

Ferrigno R, dos Santos Novaes PE, Pellizzon AC, Maia MA, et al. High dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervical cancer. Analysis of dose effectiveness and late complication. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 2001;50:1123-35.

Noda SE, Ohno T, Kato S, Ishii T, et al. Late rectal complications evaluated by computed tomography-based dose calculations in patients with cervical carcinoma undergoing high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(1):118-24.

Eng T, Fuller D, Cavanaugh SX, Blough M, et al. Significant rectal and bladder dose reduction via utilization of Foley balloon catheters in high-dose-rate tandem and ovoid intracavitary brachytherapy of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
2004;59(1):174-8.

Malaker K, Shukla V, D'Souza H, Weatherburn H. Minimizing urinary bladder radiation dose during brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix using balloon inflation technique: In regard to Malaker. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61:257-66.

Lee KC, Kim TH, Choi JH, Choi MS, et al. Use of the rectal retractor to reduce the rectal dose in high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for a carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Yonsei Med J 2004 Feb 29;45(1):113-22.

Bahena JH, Martinez A, Yan D, Mele E, et al. Spatial reproducibility of the ring and tandem high-dose rate cervix applicator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;41:13-9.

Rutten RR, Lawyer AA, Berner P. Dose variation due to differences in applicator placement used for intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Med Dosim 1998;23(1):57-63.

Senkus-Konefka E, Kobierska A, Jassem J, Badzio A, et al. Patient-related factors determining geometry of intracavitary applicators and pelvic dose distribution during cervical cancer brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;37: 531-6.

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). Dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gynaecology, ICRU report 38. Bethesda : ICRU ; 1985.

Pham HT, Chen Y, Rouby E, Lustig R, et al. Changes in high-dose-rate tandem and ovoid applicator positions during treatment in an unfixed brachytherapy system. Radiology 1998;206:525-31.

Osman A, Rupak K, Bhudatt R, Mostafa D, et al. Anatomic variation of prescription points and treatment volume with fractionated high-dose rate gynecological brachytherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2002;3:1-5.

Datta NR, Kumar S, Das KJ, Ayyagari S, et al. Variations of intracavitary applicator geometry during multiple HDR brachytherapy insertions in carcinoma cervix and its influence on reporting as per ICRU report 38. Radiother Oncol 2001;60:15-24.

Uno T, Itami J, Aruga M, Kotaka K, et al. High dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: Risk factors for late rectal complications.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;40:615-21.

Van Lancker M, Storme G, Ferrigno R, et al. Prediction of severe late complication in fractionated, high dose rate brachytherapy in the gynecologic applications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;20:1125-9.

Nag S, Chao C, Erickson B, Fowler J, et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for low-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;52:33-48.

Barillot I, Horiot JC, Maingon P, Truc G, et al. Impact on treatment outcome and late effects of customized treatment planning in cervix carcinomas: Baseline results to compare new strategies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;48:189-200.

Fellner C, Poetter R, Knocke TH, Wambersy A, et al. Comparison of radiography and computed tomography-based treatment plan in cervix cancer in brachytherapy with specific attention to some quality assurance aspects. Radiother Oncol 2001;58:53- 62.

Haie-Meder C, Poetter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E,et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): Concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI
assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 2005;74:235-45.

Malyapa RS, Mutic S, Low DA, Imran Zoberi et al. Physiologic FDG-PET three-dimensional brachytherapy treatment plan for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;54:1140 -6.

Mutic S, Grigsby PW, Low DA, Harms WB,et al. PET-guided three dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary gynecologic implants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;52: 1104 -10.

Pelloski CE, Palmer M, Chronowski GM, Jhingran A, et al. Comparison between CTbased volumetric calculations and ICRU reference-point estimates of radiation doses delivered to bladder and rectum during intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer.Int
J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:131-7.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Bhumiwatn K, Chitapanarux I, Lorvidhaya V, Kamnerdsupaphon P, Tharavichitkul E, Sukthomya V. RADIATION DOSE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE TWO TECHNIQUES OF INTRACAVITARY BRACHYTHERAPY IN CERVICAL CANCER. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2008 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 15];14(2):33-46. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/203549

Issue

Section

Original articles