Dosimetric comparison between 60Co and 192Ir High Dose Rate intracavitary brachytherapy in uterine cervical carcinoma: treatment planning study
References
Richter J, Baier K, Flentje M. Comparison of 60cobalt and 192iridium sources in high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy: Strahlenther Onkol .2008 ;184:187-92.
Palmer A, Hayman O, Muscat S. Treatment planning study of the 3D dosimetric differences between Co-60 and Ir-192 sources in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervix cancer: J Contemp brachyther. 2012;4:52-9.
Park DW, Kim YS, Park SH, Choi EK, Ahn SD, Lee SW, et al. A comparison of dose distributions of HDR intracavitary brachytherapy using different sources and treatment planning systems: Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67:1426-31.
Granero D, Perez-Calatayud J, Ballester F. Technical note: Dosimetric study of a new Co-60 source used in brachytherapy: Med phys. 2007;34:3485-8.
López JF A, Donsire JT, Alcalde R G. Monte Carlo dosimetry of the most commonly used 192Ir high dose rate brachytherapy sources: Rev Fis Med. 2011;12:159-68.
Khan FM. Khan’s Lectures; Handbook of the Physics of Radiation Therapy. 2011.
Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Ibbott GS, et al. Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations: Med phys 2004;31:633-74.
Potter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol . 2006 ;78:67-77.
Strohmaier S, Zwierzchowski G. Comparison of 60Co and 192Ir sources in HDR brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachyther. 2011;3:199-208.
Palmer A, Hayman O, Muscat S. Treatment planning study of the 3D dosimetric differences between Co-60 and Ir-192 sources in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervix cancer: J Contemp brachyther. 2012;4:52-9.
Park DW, Kim YS, Park SH, Choi EK, Ahn SD, Lee SW, et al. A comparison of dose distributions of HDR intracavitary brachytherapy using different sources and treatment planning systems: Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67:1426-31.
Granero D, Perez-Calatayud J, Ballester F. Technical note: Dosimetric study of a new Co-60 source used in brachytherapy: Med phys. 2007;34:3485-8.
López JF A, Donsire JT, Alcalde R G. Monte Carlo dosimetry of the most commonly used 192Ir high dose rate brachytherapy sources: Rev Fis Med. 2011;12:159-68.
Khan FM. Khan’s Lectures; Handbook of the Physics of Radiation Therapy. 2011.
Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Ibbott GS, et al. Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations: Med phys 2004;31:633-74.
Potter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol . 2006 ;78:67-77.
Strohmaier S, Zwierzchowski G. Comparison of 60Co and 192Ir sources in HDR brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachyther. 2011;3:199-208.
Downloads
Published
2017-06-29
How to Cite
1.
Sintuprom R, Tangboonduangjit P, Dumrongkitudom N. Dosimetric comparison between 60Co and 192Ir High Dose Rate intracavitary brachytherapy in uterine cervical carcinoma: treatment planning study. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2017 Jun. 29 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];23(1):69-74. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/203070
Issue
Section
Original articles
License
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารมะเร็งวิวัฒน์ ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับ และบุคคลากรท่านอื่น ๆ ใน สมาคมฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
