Dose Tracking Accuracy of the Dose on the Treatment Day using Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Radiation Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Pilot Study

Authors

  • Achawee Suwannarat Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University
  • Tanwiwat Jaikuna Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Pittaya Dankulchai Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Wiwatchai Sittiwong Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Nuanpen Damrongkijudom Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University
  • Lalida Tuntipumiamorn Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Keywords:

CBCT, Dose tracking, Prostate cancer, VMAT

Abstract

Background: The benefit of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is not only for pretreatment setup verification, but also their potential in providing the three-dimensional anatomical information to present the organ deformation and daily actual dose distribution. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the dose tracking on the treatment day for 5 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate cancer patients using CBCT-based dose calculation. Materials and methods: The CBCT HU to electron density calibration curve was firstly generated. Then, the accuracy of CBCT-based dose calculation (DCBCT) was verified by comparing with dose measurements on CIRS pelvic phantom using IC (0.13cc) and Gafchromic EBT3 film. Velocity 3.2.0 deformable image registration (DIR) software was applied to map organ contours from planning CT (PCT) to the fractionated CBCT and modified by the radiation oncologist. Isodose distribution on CBCT images was calculated and variation of the organ volume as well as the dosimetric parameters following the QUANTEC-guideline for the planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risks were collected and analyzed. Results: Point dose and dose distribution difference in phantom, between the measurements and DCBCT, 2.28% and 87.7% (3%/3mm) gamma passing rate was presented. In clinical investigation, the volume ratio of CBCT/PCT for PTV, bladder and rectum were found to be 1.04, 1.11 and 0.91. DCBCT was found to be deviated from DPCT about -8.26% for D95% of PTV, 1.12% and 9.12% for Dmean and V70Gy of bladder, 6.60%, and 7.10%, for Dmean and V70Gy of rectum, respectively. Conclusion: Dose tracking on treatment day using CBCT-based dose calculation and DIR to guide organ contouring is found to be feasible and adequate to predict the actual dose delivery to the VMAT prostate cancer.

References

Bhide SA, Nutting CM. Recent advances in radiotherapy. BMC medicine. 2010;8:25.

Ahmad SS, Duke S, Jena R, Williams MV, Burnet NG. Advances in radiotherapy. BMJ. 2012;345.

Sterzing F, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Flentje M, Debus J. Image-guided radiotherapy: a new dimension in radiation oncology. Dtsch Arztebi Int. 2011; 108:274-80.

Pearson D, Gill SK, Campbell N, Reddy K. Dosimetric and volumetric changes in the rectum and ladder in patients receiving CBCT-guided prostate IMRT: analysis based on daily CBCT dose alculation. J Appl clin Med Phys. 2016; 17:107-17.

Orlandini LC, Coppola M, Fulcheri C, Cernusco L, Wang P, Cionini L. Dose tracking assessment for image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate bed and the impact on clinical workflow. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:78.

Yoo S, Yin FF. Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. International J of Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 66(5):1553-61.

Emami B. Tolerance of Normal Tissue to Therapeutic Radiation. Rep Radiother Oncol. 2013;1:123-7.

Bissonnette JP, Balter PA, Dong L, Langen KM, Lovelock DM, Miften M, et al. Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: a report of the AAPM TG-179. Med Phys. 2012; 39:1946-63.

Tuntipumiamorn L, Iampongpaiboon P, Damrongkijudom N, Krongyuth K, Polwatsatian V, Jaikreng S. Accuracy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose calculations: verification based on-board conebeam CT imaging. Asian Biomed. 2011;5: 537-41

Zhang GS, Huang SM, Chen C, Xu SK, Zhang DD, Deng XW. Evaluating the Therapeutic Dose Distribution of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image: A Methodological Study. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:8.

Yang Y, Schreibmann E, Li T, Wang C, Xing L. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52:685-705.

Sriram P, Vivekanandan N, Prabakar S. A Study on Evaluation of kV-CBCTimage-based Treatment Planning using Anthropomorphic Phantom. J Med Bio Eng. 2010; 31:429-35.

Rong Y, Smilowitz J, Tewatia D, Tome WA, Paliwal B. Dose calculation on kV cone beam CT images: an investigation of the Hu-density conversion stability and dose accuracy using the site-specific calibration. Med Dosim 2010; 35:195-207.

Chen Z, Yang Z, Wang J, Hu W. Dosimetric impact of different bladder and rectum filling during prostate cancer radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:103.

Hüttenrauch VVP. Dose calculation on daily Cone Beam CT data sets for the investigation of the target volume coverage and dose to the organs at risk for prostate cancer patients [Master thesis]. University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg. 2013.https://www.thm.de/lse/images/user/KZink105/Abschlussarbeiten/Masterarbeit_Petra_Huettenrauch_2013.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-27

How to Cite

1.
Suwannarat A, Jaikuna T, Dankulchai P, Sittiwong W, Damrongkijudom N, Tuntipumiamorn L. Dose Tracking Accuracy of the Dose on the Treatment Day using Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Radiation Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Pilot Study. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2019 Jun. 27 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];25(1):71-85. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/203016

Issue

Section

Original articles