Modified use of the Triflo II® incentive spirometer and its effects on feedback ball elevation, selective closure of air inlets, and inspiratory flow and pressure: A bench study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The Triflo II® incentive spirometer (TF) is widely prescribed for lung expansion exercise, but its high inspiratory flow rate and short inspiratory time, leading to increased effort and lower tidal volume, are recognized limitations. Modifying its use may improve its effectiveness.
Objectives: As an initial step before human studies, a bench test was conducted to evaluate inspiratory flow and pressure responses under controlled conditions.
Materials and methods: A bench test was conducted under two conditions: (1) three target ball elevation levels were marked on the wall of each TF chamber, and airflow rate and pressure responses were evaluated during simulated airflow at each target level; and (2) selective closure of air inlets was performed by closing one or two of the three air inlet holes of the TF device, and the corresponding airflow rate and pressure responses were evaluated.
Results: No significant differences were observed in the 900 mL/sec chamber. In the 600 mL/sec chamber, the fourth quarter had a significantly higher flow rate (652±6 mL/sec) than the second (605±5 mL/sec, p<0.001) and third (601±8 mL/sec, p<0.001). Similarly, in the 1200 mL/sec chamber, the fourth quarter (994±13 mL/sec) had a significantly higher flow rate than the second (917±8 mL/sec, p<0.001) and third (914±7 mL/sec, p<0.001). Closing the second and third air inlet holes while lifting the 600 mL/sec ball produced the lowest inspiratory flow rate (432±15 mL/sec) and pressure (-4.0±0.3 cm H₂O) among conditions.
Conclusion: Feedback ball elevation influenced inspiratory flow and pressure in the 600 and 1200 mL/sec chambers, whereas no significant differences were observed in the 900 mL/sec chamber. Selective closure of air inlets, particularly closure of two inlets, markedly reduced inspiratory flow and pressure. Further in vivo studies in human subjects are warranted to validate these findings.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Personal views expressed by the contributors in their articles are not necessarily those of the Journal of Associated Medical Sciences, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University.
References
[1] Restrepo RD, Wettstein R, Wittnebel L, Tracy M. Incentive spirometry: 2011. Respir Care. 2011; 56(10): 1600-4. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01471.
[2] Eltorai AE, Szabo AL, Antoci V Jr, Ventetuolo CE, Daniels AH, Bardenheuer B, et al. Clinical effectiveness of incentive spirometry for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications. Respir Care. 2018; 63(3): 347-52. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05679.
[3] Ubolsakka-Jones C, Tasangkar W, Jones DA. Comparison of breathing patterns, pressure, volume, and flow characteristics of three breathing techniques to encourage lung inflation in healthy older people. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019; 35(12): 1283-91. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1477890.
[4] Tomich GM, França DC, Diório AC, Britto RR, Sampaio RF, Parreira VF. Breathing pattern, thoracoabdominal motion and muscular activity during three breathing exercises. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007; 40(10): 1409-17. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2006005000165.
[5] Parreira VF, Tomich GM, Britto RR, Sampaio RF. Assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow-oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjects. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005; 38(7): 1105-12. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2005000700014.
[6] Alaparthi GK, Augustine AJ, Anand R, Mahale A. Comparison of diaphragmatic breathing exercise, volume and flow incentive spirometry, on diaphragm excursion and pulmonary function in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Minim Invasive Surg. 2016; 2016: 1967532. doi: 10.1155/2016/1967532.
[7] Lunardi AC, Porras DC, Barbosa RC, Paisani DM, Marques da Silva CC, Bisi H, et al. Effect of volume-oriented versus flow-oriented incentive spirometry on chest wall volumes, inspiratory muscle activity, and thoracoabdominal synchrony in the elderly. Respir Care. 2014; 59(3): 420-6. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02665.
[8] Hughes JM, Grant BJ, Greene RE, Iliff LD, Milic-Emili J. Inspiratory flow rate and ventilation distribution in normal subjects and in patients with simple chronic bronchitis. Clin Sci. 1972; 43(5): 583-95. doi: 10.1042/cs0430583.
[9] Kaongampanich P, Likit K. The alterations in negative pressure during the use of flow-oriented incentive spirometer when closing different gates of capacity chamber to enhance pulmonary rehabilitation efficiency (in Thai). Proceeding Book of R2R: Golden Jubilee Medical Center, Mahidol University. 2025: 4-12. doi: 10.14457/MU.RES.2025.6.
[10] Mang H, Weindler J, Zapf CL. Postoperative Atemtherapie mit Incentive-Spirometrie [Postoperative respiratory therapy using incentive spirometry]. Anaesthesist. 1989; 38(4): 200-5.
[11] West JB, Luks AM. West’s respiratory physiology: the essentials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016.
[12] Mang H, Obermayer A. Imposed work of breathing during sustained maximal inspiration: comparison of six different incentive spirometers. Respir Care. 1989; 34(12): 1122-8.
[13] Capstick TG, Clifton IJ. Inhaler technique and training in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2012; 6(1): 91-103. doi: 10.1586/ers.11.89.