Comparative Analysis of Functional Outcomes in Stroke Patients: First Admission Versus Readmission to Inpatient Rehabilitation

Supitcha  Tassatarn; Chayaporn Chotiyarnwong

Authors

Supitcha Tassatarn Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Chayaporn Chotiyarnwong Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Keywords:

readmission, Post-stroke, rehabilitation, length of stay, treatment outcome

Abstract

Objectives: To explore potential differences in functional outcomes of stroke patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation between their first admission and readmission to the rehabilitation ward.

Study design: Observational study design: retrospective chart review

Setting: Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The inpatient ward (25 beds) of the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, which has a limited admission period of up to 3 weeks.

participant: Stroke patients over 18 years of age who were admitted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020.

Methods: Using matched demographics, a comparison of functional outcomes between the first admission and readmission of stroke patients were conducted. Functional outcomes were evaluated based on changes in the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), rehabilitation efficiency (average increase in MBI scores per day), and rehabilitation effectiveness (potential improvement) comparing patients after their first admission and those following readmission.

Results: The demographic characteristics of patients at their first admission and readmitted patients showed no significant differences in age, sex, underlying disease, stroke classification, hemineglect, aphasia, dysphagia, motor power of the upper extremities, onset-to-admission interval, length of stay, or admission MBI score (p > 0.05). Functional outcomes were calculated and are presented as follows: The median of MBI changes were 2 (1, 5) for the first admission and 2 (1, 4) at readmission, with r = 0.09, p = 0.19; rehabilitation efficiency was 11 (6, 27) for the first admission and 10 (3, 18) at readmission, with r = 0.14, p = 0.05; and rehabilitation effectiveness was 25 (9, 50) for the first admission and 20 (5, 37) at readmission, with r = 0.12, p = 0.10.

Conclusions: The improvement in functional outcomes of stroke patients upon readmission to the rehabilitation ward showed no statistically significant difference compared to the improvement during their first admission when the length of stay was limited to 3 weeks. This suggests that in hospitals with a short length of stay, readmitting patients for further rehabilitation may be warranted. However, the results may not generalize to settings with a longer average length of stay. A study investigating the prognostic factors for functional outcome improvement in readmitted stroke patients is warranted.

References

Caprio FZ, Sorond FA. Cerebrovascular Disease: Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention. Med Clin North Am [Internet]. 2019 Mar [cited 2025 Nov 15];103(2):295-308. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30704682/

Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol [Internet]. 2019 May [cited 2025 Nov 15];18(5):439-58. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30871944/

Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke [Internet]. 2016 Jun [cited 2025 Nov 15];47(6):e98-e169. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27145936/

Cassidy JM, Cramer SC. Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke. Transl Stroke Res [Internet]. 2017 Feb [cited 2025 Nov 15];8(1):33-46. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27109642/

Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair [Internet]. 2012 Oct [cited 2025 Nov 15];26(8):923-31. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22466792/

Jørgensen HS. The Copenhagen Stroke Study experience. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis [Internet]. 1996 Feb [cited 2025 Nov 15];6(1):5-16. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17894959/

Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol [Internet]. 2006 Feb [cited 2025 Nov 15];19(1):84-90. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16415682/

Ko SB, Yoon BW. Mechanisms of functional recovery after stroke. Front Neurol Neurosci [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2025 Nov 15];32:1-8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23859958/

Coleman ER, Moudgal R, Lang K, Hyacinth HI, Awosika OO, Kissela BM, et al. Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review. Curr Atheroscler Rep [Internet]. 2017 Dec [cited 2025 Nov 15];19(12):59. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29116473/

Salter K, Jutai J, Hartley M, Foley N, Bhogal S, Bayona N, et al. Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. J Rehabil Med [Internet]. 2006 Mar [cited 2025 Nov 15];38(2):113-7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16546768/

Kumthornthip W, Chotiyarnwong C. Does Early Rehabilitation Admission Improve Functional Outcomes of Stroke Patients after a Short Hospital Stay? A Thai Retrospective Study on 596 Patients. J Med Assoc Thai [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Nov 15];107:1013-20. Available from: http://www.jmatonline.com/PDF/1013-1020-PB-00664.pdf

O’Brien SR, Xue Y, Ingersoll G, Kelly A. Shorter length of stay is associated with worse functional outcomes for medicare beneficiaries with stroke. Phys Ther [Internet]. 2013 Dec [cited 2025 Nov 15];93(12):1592-602. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23886846/

Bindawas SM, Vennu V, Mawajdeh H, Alhaidary HM, Moftah E. Length of Stay and Functional Outcomes Among Patients with Stroke Discharged from an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility in Saudi Arabia. Med Sci Monit [Internet]. 2018 Mar [cited 2025 Nov 15];24:207-14. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29321468/

Tran DT, Yan C, Dukelow SP, Round J. Length of Stay and Home Discharge for Patients with Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation. Can J Neurol Sci [Internet]. 2023 Jan [cited 2025 Nov 15];50(1):28-36. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34666861/

The World Health Organization MONICA Project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration. WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2025 Nov 15];41(2):105-14. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3335877/

López-Liria R, Vega-Ramírez FA, Rocamora-Pérez P, Aguilar-Parra JM, Padilla-Góngora D. Comparison of Two Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Programs: A Follow-Up Study among Primary versus Specialized Health Care. PLoS One [Internet]. 2016 Nov [cited 2025 Nov 15];11(11):e0166242. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27835673/

Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 1989 [cited 2025 Nov 15];42(8):703-9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2760661/

Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2025 Nov 15];10(2):61-3. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3403500/

Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2025 Nov 15];10(2):64-7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3042746/

Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-5.

Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke [Internet]. 1990 Feb [cited 2025 Nov 15];21(2):241-6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2305399/

Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, Ket JC, Heymans MW. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke [Internet]. 2011 May [cited 2025 Nov 15];42(5):1482-8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21474812/

Yoo JW, Hong BY, Jo L, Kim JS, Park JG, Shin BK, et al. Effects of Age on Long-Term Functional Recovery in Patients with Stroke. Medicina (Kaunas) [Internet]. 2020 Sep [cited 2025 Nov 15];56(9). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32906615/

Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke [Internet]. 1990 Feb [cited 2025 Nov 15];21(2):247-51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2305400/

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Second Edition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. 77 p.

Wattanapan P, Lukkanapichonchut P, Massakulpan P, Suethanapornkul S, Kuptniratsaikul V. Effectiveness of Stroke Rehabilitation Compared between Intensive and Nonintensive Rehabilitation Protocol: A Multicenter Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis [Internet]. 2020 Jun [cited 2025 Nov 15];29(6):104809. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32312631/

Ngamjarus C, Chongsuvivatwong V, McNeil E. n4Studies: Sample Size Calculation for an Epidemiological Study on a Smart Device. Siriraj Med J [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Nov 15];68:160-70. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/58342

Hsieh YW, Wang CH, Wu SC, Chen PC, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair [Internet]. 2007 Jun [cited 2025 Nov 15];21(3):233-8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17351082/

O’Brien SR, Xue Y. Predicting goal achievement during stroke rehabilitation for Medicare beneficiaries. Disabil Rehabil [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 Nov 15];36(15):1273-8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24151817/

Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2014 Feb [cited 2025 Nov 15];9(2):e87987. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24505342/

Kortebein P. Rehabilitation for hospital-associated deconditioning. Am J Phys Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2009 Jan [cited 2025 Nov 15];88(1):66-77. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18688198/

Suriyaarachchi P, Chu L, Bishop A, Thew T, Matthews K, Cowan R, et al. Evaluating Effectiveness of an Acute Rehabilitation Program in Hospital-Associated Deconditioning. J Geriatr Phys Ther [Internet]. 2020 Oct [cited 2025 Nov 15];43(4):172-8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31389854/

Ottenbacher KJ, Graham JE, Ottenbacher AJ, Lee J, Al Snih S, Karmarkar A, et al. Hospital readmission in persons with stroke following postacute inpatient rehabilitation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci [Internet]. 2012 Aug [cited 2025 Nov 15];67(8):875-81. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22389457/

Bhattacharya P, Khanal D, Madhavan R, Chaturvedi S. Why do ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients get readmitted? J Neurol Sci [Internet]. 2011 Aug [cited 2025 Nov 15];307(1-2):50-4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21636101/

Duffy L, Gajree S, Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Quinn TJ. Reliability (inter-rater agreement) of the Barthel Index for assessment of stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke [Internet]. 2013 Feb [cited 2025 Nov 15];44(2):462-8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23299497/