Comparison of the Sit-to-Stand Test with the 6-Minute Walk Test in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients

Authors

  • Radchaphoom Anukul Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Patrawut Intarakamhang Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Chanwit Phongamwong Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Phatra Meesuksabai Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

sit-to-stand test (STST), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), cardiac rehabilitation

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the sit-to-stand test and the 6-minute walk test in cardiac rehabilitation patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery

Study design: Cross-sectional study

Setting: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Ratchathewi District, Bangkok

Subjects: Thai adults aged between 20 and 79 years who had undergone CABG and came to the hospital to receive cardiac rehabilitation as an outpatient

Methods: Participants started with the 6-minute walk test.  After adequate rest, the participants then performed the sit-to-stand test. The 6-minute walk distance and sit-to-stand test results were recorded, along with blood pressure, heart rate and the rating of the perceived exertion scale before and after the tests.

Results: There were a total of 43 participants. The correlation coefficient (r) between the 6-minute walk test and the sit-to-stand test was 0.58 (p < 0.001), indicating a moderately significant correlation. The exercise intensities from both the sit-to-stand and 6-minute walk tests were light were considered safe.

Conclusions: A moderately significant correlation was demonstrated between the sit-to-stand test and the 6-minute walk test in post-CABG patients. The intensity of both tests was light and safe. The sit-to-stand test should be considered an alternative submaximal exercise test in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation services.

References

Sanderson BK, Southard D, Oldridge N, Group W. Outcomes Evaluation in Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Programs: IMPROVING PATIENT CARE AND PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS [Internet] 2004 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 24(2):[68-79 pp.]. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jcrjournal/fulltext/2004/03000/outcomes_evaluation_in_cardiac.2.aspx

Balady GJ, Ades PA, Bittner VA, Franklin BA, Gordon NF, Thomas RJ, et al. Referral, enrollment, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs at clinical centers and beyond: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. [Internet] 2011 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 124(25):2951-60. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22082676/ doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823b21e2

Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, Zwisler AD, Rees K, Martin N, et al. Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. [Internet] 2016 [cited 2024 Feb 27];67(1):1-12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26764059/ doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044

Chang HC, Chen CH, Cheng YY. Therapeutic Effects of Intradialytic Exercise on Life Quality of Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: Study Protocol for a Randomized Control Trial. Healthcare (Basel). [Internet] 2022 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 10(6). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35742154/ doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061103

Solway S, Brooks D, Lacasse Y, Thomas S. A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest. [Internet] 2001 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 119(1):256-70. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11157613/ doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1.256

Casillas JM, Hannequin A, Besson D, Benaïm S, Krawcow C, Laurent Y, et al. Walking tests during the exercise training: specific use for the cardiac rehabilitation. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. [Internet] 2013 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 56(7-8):561-75. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24126080/ doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2013.09.003

Society AT. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. [Internet] 2002 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 166(1):111-7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12091180/ doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102

Fiorina C, Vizzardi E, Lorusso R, Maggio M, De Cicco G, Nodari S, et al. The 6-min walking test early after cardiac surgery. Reference values and the effects of rehabilitation programme. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. [Internet] 2007 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 32(5):724-9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17881241/ doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.08.013

Strassmann A, Steurer-Stey C, Lana KD, Zoller M, Turk AJ, Suter P, et al. Population-based reference values for the 1-min sit-to-stand test. Int J Public Health. [Internet] 2013 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 58(6):949-53. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23974352/ doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0504-z

Gurses HN, Zeren M, Denizoglu Kulli H, Durgut E. The relationship of sit-to-stand tests with 6-minute walk test in healthy young adults. Medicine (Baltimore). [Internet] 2018 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 97(1):e9489. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29505521/ doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009489

Ozalevli S, Ozden A, Itil O, Akkoclu A. Comparison of the Sit-to-Stand Test with 6 min walk test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. [Internet] 2007 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 101(2):286-93. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16806873/ doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.05.007

Lehbert N, Wingert S, Jelusic D, Wittmann M, Schuler M, Schultz K. 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and Sit-to-Stand Test (STST) as outcome parameters in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) of COPD patients. [Internet] 2015 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 46(suppl 59):PA748. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652293/ doi:10.4103/1817-1737.165289

Beaumont M, Boucard E, Peran L, Pichon R, Liistro G, Ber-Moy CL, et al. Comparison between six minutes walking test and sit-to-stand test in COPD patients. [Internet] 2015 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 46(suppl 59):PA2076. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16806873/ doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.05.007

Meriem M, Cherif J, Toujani S, Ouahchi Y, Hmida AB, Beji M. Sit-to-stand test and 6-min walking test correlation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Thorac Med. [Internet] 2015 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 10(4):269-73. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652293/ doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.165289

Reychler G, Boucard E, Peran L, Pichon R, Le Ber-Moy C, Ouksel H, et al. One minute sit-to-stand test is an alternative to 6MWT to measure functional exercise performance in COPD patients. [Internet] 2018 [cited 2024 Feb 27]; 12(3):1247-56. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28621019/ doi: 10.1111/crj.12658

Downloads

Published

2024-09-02

Issue

Section

Short Communication