Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Paveenrath Charussuriyong -
  • Rachawan Suksathien
  • Prinne Suvannang

Keywords:

transcranial direct current stimulation, aphasia, stroke, speech therapy, stroke rehabilitation

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on improving language ability in patients with post-stroke aphasia

Study design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial

Setting: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital

Subjects: Post-stroke aphasia patients aged 18 years and over, with at least three months from stroke onset

Methods: Forty patients were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group received 2 mA of anodal tDCS over Broca’s area (F5) combined with speech therapy for 20 minutes per session per day on five consecutive days. The control group received sham-tDCS combined with speech therapy in the same protocol as the intervention group. Language skills were evaluated using the Thai Western Aphasia Battery at pre-treatment, post-treatment (after the session of the fifth day of treatment), and 1-month follow-up. The accessor was blinded.

Results: Thirty-two patients completed the assigned sessions. The mean age of the patients was 52.7 (SD=11.4) years. Most of them had an ischemic stroke (71.9%). The mean difference in Thai WAB-AQ scores between the intervention and control groups at post-treatment and 1-month follow-up were -0.05 (95% CI: -4.4, 4.3) and -2.38 (95% CI: -11.7, 6.9), respectively. However, the difference between the two groups did not reach statistical significance at either time point. No serious complication was found.

Conclusions: This study did not show sufficient evidence to support anodal tDCS concurrent speech therapy with additional improvement in language ability beyond those observed in patients undergoing speech therapy alone, among those with post-stroke aphasia.

References

Engelter S, Gostynski M, Papa S, Frei M, Born C, Ajdacic-Gross V, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke [Internet]. 2006 May [cited 2018 Oct 9];37(6):1379-84. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16690899/ doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221815.64093.8c

Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2016 Jun [cited 2018 Oct 9];1(6):1-315 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27245310/ doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.

Nouwens F, deLau LM, Visch-Brink EG, Sandt-Koenderman W, Lingsma HF, Goosen S, et al. Efficacy of early cognitive-linguistic treatment for aphasia due to stroke: A randomized controlled trial (Rotterdam Aphasia Therapy Study-3). Eur Stroke J [Internet]. 2017 Mar [cited 2018 Nov 21];2(2):126–36. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29900407/ doi: 10.1177/2396987317698327

Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol [Internet]. 2017 Jan [cited 2018 Nov 21];128(1):56–92. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27866120/ doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087.

Suntrup-Krueger S, Ringmaier C, Muhle P, Wollbrink A, Kemmling A, Hanning U, et al. Randomized trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for poststroke dysphagia. Ann Neurol [Internet]. 2018 Jan [cited 2018 Nov 21];83(2):328-340. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.25151 doi: 10.1002/ana.25151

Harnphadungkit K. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rehabilitation. J Thai Rehabil Med [Internet] 2019 [cited 2019 Jun 9];29(1):35-8. Available from: https://www.rehabmed.or.th/main/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/L-462.pdf

Kitisomprayoonkul W. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. J Thai Rehabil Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 Dec 6];23(2):37-40. Available from: https://www.rehabmed.or.th/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/L-355.pdf

Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation to Treat Stroke Patients With Aphasia. Stroke [Internet]. 2010 Jun [cited 2019 Feb 11];41(6):1229–36. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20395612/ doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576785.

Fiori V, Cipollari S, Di Paola M, Razzano C, Caltagirone C, Marangolo P. tDCS stimulation segregates words in the brain: evidence from aphasia. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. 2013 Jun [cited 2018 Sep 12];269(7):1-11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23785323/ doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00269.

Campana S, Caltagirone C, Marangolo P. Combining Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) with A-tDCS language treatment: predicting outcome of recovery in non-fluent chronic aphasia. Brain Stimul [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2023 Aug 12];8(4):769-76. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25732786/ doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.413

Vila-Nova C, Lucena PH, Lucena R, Armani-Franceschi G, Campbell FQ. Effect of Anodal tDCS on Articulatory Accuracy, Word Production, and Syllable Repetition in Subjects with Aphasia: A Cross-over, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial. Neurol Ther [Internet]. 2019 Dec [cited 2023 Aug 12];8(2):411-424. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31432434/ doi: 10.1007/s40120-019-00149-4

Fridriksson J, Rorden C, Elm J, Sen S, George MS, Bonilha L. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol [Internet]. 2018 Dec [cited 2018 Dec 16];75(12):1470-76. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30128538/ doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2287.

Spielmann K, van de Sandt-Koenderman WME, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Ribbers GM. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Language Outcome in Subacute Poststroke Aphasia. Stroke [Internet]. 2018 Apr [cited 2018 Oct 1];49(4):1018-20. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29523651/ doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020197

Polanowska KE, Lesniak MM, Seniów JB, Czepiel W, Członkowska A. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in early rehabilitation of patients with post-stroke non-fluent aphasia: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study. Restor Neurol and Neuros [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 Sep 12];31(6):761–71. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24047756/ doi: 10.3233/RNN-130333.

Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2019 May [cited cited 2019 Jul 17];5(5):1-63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31111960/ doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009760.pub4

Biou E, Cassoudesalle H, Cogné M, Sibon I, De Gabory I, Dehail P, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med [Internet]. 2019 Mar [cited cited 2019 May 7] ;62(2):104-121. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30660671/ doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.003

Kertesz A. Aphasia and association disorder; taxonomy localization and recovery. New York: Grune & Stratton,1979.

Shah-Basak PP, Norise C, Garcia G, Torres J, Faseyitan O, Hamilton RH. Individualized Treatment with Transcranial Direct Current stimulation in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia due to stroke. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. 2015 Apr [cited 2019 Jan 19];201(9):1-12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25954178/ doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00201

Marangolo P, Fiori V, Di Paola M, Cipollari S, Razzano C, Oliveri M et al. Differential involvement of the left frontal and temporal regions in verb naming: a tDCS treatment study. Restor Neurol Neurosci [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Jan 19];31(1):63-72. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23142815/ doi: 10.3233/RNN-120268

Gandour J, Daradarananda R, Potisuk S, Holasuit S. Thai Adaptation of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). Journal of Suanprung Psychiatric Hospital. 1997;13(1):16-21.

Otal B, Olma MC, Flöel A, Wellwood I. Inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation to homologous language regions as an adjunct to speech and language therapy in post-stroke aphasia: a meta-analysis. Front Hum Neurosci [Internet]. 2015 Apr [cited 2018 Sep 12];236(9):1-7. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00236/full doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00236

Silva FR, Mac-Kay APMG, Chao JC, Santos MD dos, Gagliadi RJ. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a study on naming performance in aphasic individuals. Codas [Internet]. 2018 Aug [cited 2019 Sep 27];30(5):1-6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30184007/ doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017242

Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol [Internet]. 1995 Oct [cited 2021 Aug 23];38(4):659-63. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.410380416 doi: 10.1002/ana.410380416

Watila MM, Balarabe SA. Factors predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery. J Neurol Sci [Internet]. 2015 May [cited 2022 Oct 15];352(1-2):12-8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25888529 doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.03.020

Maas MB, Lev MH, Ay H, Singhal AB, Greer DM, Smith WS, et al. The Prognosis for Aphasia in Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis [Internet]. 2012 Jul [cited 2021 Aug 23];21(5):350–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21185744 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.09.009

Kristinsson S, den Ouden DB, Rorden C, Newman-Norlund R, Neils-Strunjas J, Fridriksson J. Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy. J Stroke [Internet]. 2022 May [cited 2022 Oct 15];24(2):189-206. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35677975 doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.01102

You DS, Kim D-Y, Chun MH, Jung SE, Park SJ. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke’s area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain Lang [Internet]. 2011 Oct [cited 2019 Feb 11];119(1):1-5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21641021 doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.002

Pestalozzi MI, Di PM, Martins GC, Spierer L, Schnider A, Chouiter L, et al. Effects of Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Lexical Access in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair [Internet]. 2018 Oct [cited 2022 Oct 15];32(10):913-923. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30269644 doi: 10.1177/1545968318801551

Opitz A, Paulus W, Will S, et al. Determinants of the electric field during transcranial 774 direct current stimulation. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2015 Apr [cited 2022 Sep 21];109:140-50. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25613437 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.033

Butefisch CM, Webling M, Netz J. Relationship between interhemispheric inhibition and motor cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair [Internet]. 2008 Jan [cited 2022 Sep 21];22(1):4-21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17507644 doi: 10.1177/1545968307301769

Rosso C, Arbizu C, Dhennain C, Lamy JC, Samson Y. Repetitive sessions of tDCS to improve naming in post-stroke aphasia: Insights from an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Restor Neurol Neurosci [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 24];36(1):107-16. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29439369 doi: 10.3233/RNN-170783

Meinzer M, Darkow R, Lindenberg R, Flöel A. Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia. Brain [Internet]. 2016 Apr [cited 2019 Jan 24];139(4):1152–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26912641 doi: 10.1093/brain/aww002

Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, Wagner T, Ferreira MJ, Lima MC, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport [Internet]. 2005 Sep [cited 2022 Oct 31];16(14):1551-5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16148743 doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000177010.44602.5e

Downloads

Published

2024-01-08

Issue

Section

Original Article