Critical Line of Safety Guided Decision Making for Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy in Difficult Gallbladder Surgery

Application of Critical Line of Safety in Difficult Gallbladders

Authors

  • Nan-ak Wiboonkhwan Department of Surgery, Songklanagarind Vejchavivat Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31584/psumj.2026284085

Keywords:

anatomical landmark of bile duct, cholecystectomy, critical line of safety, critical view of safety, laparoscopy, safe cholecystectomy

Abstract

Objective: This article proposes incorporating the critical line of safety (CLS) as an anatomical and decision-making landmark to guide a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC); especially when critical view of safety (CVS) cannot be achieved.
Material and Methods: The CLS is defined as the caudocranial line running along the lateral edge of the hepatoduodenal ligament that extends from the duodenum to the cystic-hilar plate junction. Two key rules are emphasized: (1) no structure medial to the CLS should be divided and (2) dissection beyond the CLS should be avoided or performed with awareness of potential thermal injury. If completing total cholecystectomy requires resection beyond the CLS, this represents the “inflection point” to stop and perform a laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy.
Results: In difficult cholecystectomy, the key decision is to stop before bile duct injury (BDI) occurs. In cases of unattainable CVS, the CLS helps the surgeon identify the extrahepatic bile duct and thereby facilitates safe dissection. When difficult anatomy is combined with failure to achieve CVS, CLS-guided decision-making provides a foundation basis for the surgeon to recognize the inflection point and stop attempting total cholecystectomy.
Conclusion: CLS-guided decision-making provides an objective and anatomical reference for identifying the safe limit of dissection and determining when to terminate attempts at total cholecystectomy. Incorporating this landmark into standard practice may enhance surgical awareness, reduce perception bias, and prevent BDI. Further clinical validation is warranted to establish the role of CLS in safe LC.

References

Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M, Gheza F, Fagiuoli S, Di Saverio S, et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2015;18:196-204.

de’Angelis N, Catena F, Memeo R, Coccolini F, Martínez-Pérez A, Romeo OM, et al. 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. World J Emerg Surg 2021;16:30.

Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1995;180:101-25.

Brunt LM, Deziel DJ, Telem DA, Strasberg SM, Aggarwal R, Asbun H, et al. Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state of the art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2020;272:3-23.

Terho P, Sallinen V, Lampela H, Harju J, Koskenvuo L, Mentula P. The critical view of safety and bile duct injuries in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a photo evaluation study on 1532 patients. HPB 2021;23:1824-9.

Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018;25:73-86.

Leong YC, Hughes BL, Wang Y, Zaki J. Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying motivated seeing. Nat Hum Behav 2019;3:962-73.

Nassar AHM, Ng HJ, Wysocki AP, Khan KS, Gil IC. Achieving the critical view of safety in the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of predictors of failure. Surg Endosc 2021;35:6039-47.

Strasberg SM. A three-step conceptual roadmap for avoiding bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an invited perspective review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2019;26:123-7.

Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Ohyama T, Umezawa A, Takada T, Strasberg SM, et al. Delphi consensus on bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an evolutionary cul-de-sac or the birth pangs of a new technical framework? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017;24:591-602.

LeCompte MT, Robbins KJ, Williams GA, Sanford DE, Hammill CW, Fields RC, et al. Less is more in the difficult gallbladder: recent evolution of subtotal cholecystectomy in a single HPB unit. Surg Endosc 2021;35:3249-57.

Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D’Acapito F, Vellone M, et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 2005;140:986-92.

Wiboonkhwan NA, Thongkan T, Pitakteerabundit T. Photographic analysis of the anatomical landmarks in bile duct injury. ANZ J Surg 2022;92:1955-7.

Wiboonkhwan NA, Pitakteerabundit T, Thongkan T. Total hilar exposure maneuver for repair of complex bile duct injury. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2022;6:176-81.

Shallaly GEI, Cuschieri A. Nature, aetiology and outcome of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB 2000;2:3-12.

Anns KM, Khan F, Aman M, Shahid J, Haq TUI, Memon WA, et al. Pseudoaneurysm of cystic artery stump after laparoscopic cholecystectomy managed successfully with branch hepatic artery embolization using jail technique. J Surg Case Rep 2024;2024:rjae152.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-17

How to Cite

1.
Wiboonkhwan N- ak. Critical Line of Safety Guided Decision Making for Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy in Difficult Gallbladder Surgery: Application of Critical Line of Safety in Difficult Gallbladders . PSU Med J [internet]. 2026 Apr. 17 [cited 2026 Apr. 20];6(1):45-51. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PSUMJ/article/view/284085

Issue

Section

VIDEO publication