Comparison of Intubating Condition of the McGrath® Video Laryngoscope With and Without Muscle Relaxant
Muscle Relaxation in VIDEO Laryngoscopic Intubation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31584/psumj.2023257019Keywords:
intubating conditions;, McGrath®, muscle relaxants, video laryngoscopeAbstract
Objective: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the intubating conditions using the McGrath® Series 5 Portable Video Laryngoscope (VL) with and without a muscle relaxant.
Material and Methods: This randomized, prospective study was performed in 34 patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) I-II who required oroendotracheal tube intubation. The patients were divided into two groups as
the rocuronium group and the placebo (saline) group. McGrath® VL intubation was initiated after 90 seconds when the
patient was fully relaxed. The primary outcome was the conditions of tracheal intubation between the two groups. The
secondary outcome were the success rate of the first intubation attempt, time to intubation, required propofol dosage
for intubation, and the anesthetic events during the intraoperative and recovery room periods were evaluated.
Results: Compared to the placebo group, the intubating conditions in the rocuronium group were more acceptable
(excellent or good conditions) (88.2 vs. 41.2%; p-value=0.007). There were no significant differences in the success
rates of first attempt intubations (16(94.1), 13(76.5); p-value=0.4). In comparison to the rocuronium group, the placebo
group required more propofol (218 mg vs. 186 mg; p-value=0.023). The rates of intraoperative and recovery room
events were similar.
Conclusion: Overall the intubating conditions when using the McGrath® VL Series 5 Portable Video Laryngoscope using
muscle relaxants were more acceptable than when not using muscle relaxants, but there were no significant differences
in the number of attempts, time to intubation, and anesthetic events between the study groups.
References
Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2022;136:31–81.
Taylor AM, Peck M, Launcelott S, Hung OR, Law JA, Mac Quarrie K, et al. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2013;68:142–7.
Sargin M, Uluer MS. Comparison of McGrath(®) Series 5 video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospec-tive, randomised trial in patients with normal airways. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32:869–74.
Jeon WJ, Kim KH, Yeom JH, Bang MR, Hong JB, Cho SY. A comparison of the Glidescope® to the McGrath® videolar-yngoscope in patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011;61:19–23.
Leissner KB, Beutler S, Bigatello L, Srinivasa V. GlideScope®
Tracheal Intubation with and without Muscle Relaxation: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. Open Anesth J [serial on the Internet]. 2013 [cited 2022 Jun 13];7:5-11. Available from:https://openanesthesiajournal.com/VOLUME/7/PAGE/5/
Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson LI, Gramstad L, Jensen E, Jensen FS, et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996;40:59–74.
Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, Hoy C, Lee E, Scott I, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:440–5.
Bouvet L, Stoian A, Jacquot-Laperrière S, Allaouchiche B, Chassard D, Boselli E. Laryngeal injuries and intubating con ditions with or without muscular relaxation: an equivalence study. Can J Anaesth 2008;55:674–84.
Jones PM, Turkstra TP, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, Cherry RA, Hoogstra J, et al. Effect of stylet angulation and endotra cheal tube camber on time to intubation with the GlideScope. Can J Anaesth 2007;54:21–7.
Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2022;136:31–81.
Taylor AM, Peck M, Launcelott S, Hung OR, Law JA, Mac Quarrie K, et al. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2013;68:142–7.
Sargin M, Uluer MS. Comparison of McGrath(®) Series 5 video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospec-tive, randomised trial in patients with normal airways. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32:869–74.
Jeon WJ, Kim KH, Yeom JH, Bang MR, Hong JB, Cho SY. A comparison of the Glidescope® to the McGrath® videolar-yngoscope in patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011;61:19–23.
Leissner KB, Beutler S, Bigatello L, Srinivasa V. GlideScope®
Tracheal Intubation with and without Muscle Relaxation: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. Open Anesth J [serial on the Internet]. 2013 [cited 2022 Jun 13];7:5-11. Available from:https://openanesthesiajournal.com/VOLUME/7/PAGE/5/
Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson LI, Gramstad L, Jensen E, Jensen FS, et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996;40:59–74.
Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, Hoy C, Lee E, Scott I, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:440–5.
Bouvet L, Stoian A, Jacquot-Laperrière S, Allaouchiche B, Chassard D, Boselli E. Laryngeal injuries and intubating con ditions with or without muscular relaxation: an equivalence study. Can J Anaesth 2008;55:674–84.
Jones PM, Turkstra TP, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, Cherry RA, Hoogstra J, et al. Effect of stylet angulation and endotra cheal tube camber on time to intubation with the GlideScope. Can J Anaesth 2007;54:21–7.
Turkstra TP, Harle CC, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, Cherry RA, Hoogstra J, et al. The GlideScope-specific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for Glide Scope use. Can J Anaesth 2007;54:891–6.
Turkstra TP, Harle CC, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, Cherry RA, Hoogstra J, et al. The GlideScope-specific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for Glide Scope use. Can J Anaesth 2007;54:891–6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.