Analysis of the Linkage Between Concepts, Theory, and Research
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nursing research is a systematic process of inquiry based on empirical research methodologies to develop nursing knowledge, encompassing nursing practice, education, and administration. Theory-linked research involves utilizing existing nursing theories as frameworks for conducting research. The goal is to test these theories or generate new ones that contribute useful, generalizable knowledge to nursing. However, theories are composed of relatively abstract concepts and propositions. Researchers must analyze and deduce these abstract statements into concrete terms to design effective and credible research. This article illustrates methods for analyzing the relationships between concepts, theories, and research. These methods include Gibbs’s model of substruction, Hinshaw’s theoretical substruction, and Fawcett’s conceptual-theoretical-empirical structure. These methods can help researchers gain insight into the relationships between concepts, theories, and the determination of research variables and instruments. Consequently, the researchers can develop effective empirical research methodologies that align with theories and are practical for their research projects.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Chin, P. L., & Kramer, M. K. (1995). Theory and nursing: A systematic approach (4th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
Fawcett, J. (2009). Using the Roy adaptation model to guide research and/or practice: Construction of conceptual-theoretical-
empirical systems of knowledge. Aquichan, 9(3), 297-306.
Fawcett, J. (2017). Applying conceptual models of nursing: Quality improvement, research, and practice. New York: Springer.
Fawcett, J. (2021a). Middle-range theories and situation-specific theories: Similarities and differences. In E. Im & A. I. Meleis
(Eds.), Situation specific theories: Development, utilization, and evaluation in nursing (pp. 39-48). Switzerland: Springer.
Fawcett, J. (2021b). Empirical indicators: Conceptual and theoretical origins. Aquichan, 21(4), e2144.
Fawcett, J., & Garity, J. (2009). Evaluating research for evidence-based nursing practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
Gibbs, J. P. (1972). Sociological theory construction. Hinsdale: Dryden.
Hinshaw, A. S. (1979). Problems in doing research. Theoretical substruction: An assessment process. Western Journal of Nursing
Research, 1(4), 319-324.
McQuiston, C. M., & Campbell, J. C. (1997). Theoretical substruction: A guide for theory testing research. Nursing Science
Quarterly, 10(3), 117–123.
Meleis, A. I. (2012). Theoretical nursing: Development & progress (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Phillips, K. D. (2002). Sister Callista Roy: Adaption model. In A. M. Tomey & M. R. Alligood (Eds.), Nursing theorists and their
work (5th ed.) (pp. 269-289). St. Louis: Mosby.
Riegel, B., Dickson, V. V., & Faulkner, K. M. (2016). The situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care: Revised and updated.
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 31(3), 226-235.
Roy, S. C., & Andrews, H. A. (2009). Roy adaptation model (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle. River, NJ: Pearson.
Russo, S. A. (2019). Development and psychometric analysis of the Roy adaptation modes scale (RAM) to measure coping and
adaptation (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://acade micworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=4181&
context=gc_etds
Suwannakeeree, W., & Jullmusi, O. (2025). Analysis and evaluation of nursing theories: processes and application. NU Journal of
Nursing and Health Sciences, 19(1), 1-13. [in Thai]
Wang, X., Tang, L., Howell, D., Zhang, Q., Qiu, R., Zhang, H., … Ye, Z. (2020). Theory-guided interventions for Chinese patients
to adapt to heart failure: A quasi-experimental study. International journal of nursing sciences, 7(4), 391-400.
Wolf, Z. R., & Heinzer, M. M. (1999). Substruction: Illustrating the connections from research question to analysis. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 15(1), 33-37.