Success Rate of Mifepristone Combined with Misoprostol in Termination of Unwanted Pregnancy at Vachira Phuket Hospital

Authors

  • Wirun Thongchumnum Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vachira Phuket Hospital

Keywords:

unwanted pregnancy, medical abortion, mifepristone, misoprostol, efficacy, adverse effects

Abstract

Background: Unintended pregnancy is a major public health and social issue with significant physical, psychological, and socioeconomic consequences. Medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with misoprostol is a well-established and highly effective method; however, evidence in the Thai context remains limited, particularly following the amendment of the Criminal Code Section 305.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of unintended pregnancy, and to identify factors associated with incomplete abortion and adverse effects.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed medical records of women aged 15–50 years with gestational age ≤12 weeks who underwent medical abortion with oral mifepristone 200 mg followed by sublingual misoprostol 800 μg at Vachira Phuket Hospital. A total of 126 cases were included Between June 2024 to March 2025

Results: The complete abortion rate was 78.6%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that lower educational attainment (secondary school vs. bachelor’s degree or higher: adjusted OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.19–16.29) and partner’s age ≥30 years (adjusted OR 5.52, 95% CI 1.04–29.12) were significantly associated with incomplete abortion. Most patients (76.2%) reported only one adverse effect, with lower abdominal cramping being the most common (65%) and no serious complications requiring hospitalization were observed.

Conclusion: A single regimen of mifepristone 200 mg followed by misoprostol 800 μg achieved a complete abortion rate of 78.6% among women with gestational age ≤12 weeks. Educational level and partner’s age were significantly associated with incomplete abortion. The regimen was generally safe with no severe adverse events. Tailored counseling and consideration of repeat misoprostol dosing may enhance treatment effectiveness in clinical practice.

References

Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):843–52.

Klima CS. Unintended pregnancy: consequences and solutions for a worldwide problem. J Nurse Midwifery. 1998;43(6):483–91.

Leftwich HK, Alves MV. Adolescent pregnancy. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017;64(2):381–8.

Qiu X, Zhang S, Sun X, Li H, Wang D. Unintended pregnancy and postpartum depression: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies. J Psychosom Res. 2020;138:110259.

Yazdkhasti M, Pourreza A, Pirak A, Abdi F. Unintended pregnancy and its adverse social and economic consequences on health system: a narrative review article. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(1):12–21.

Royal Thai Government Gazette [Internet]. Bangkok: Office of the Council of State; 2021 [cited 2025 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2564/A/010/T_0001.PDF

World Health Organization. Abortion care guideline [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240039483

Bryant AG, Regan E, Stuart G. An overview of medical abortion for clinical practice. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(1):39–45.

Podolskyi V, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Maltzman LL, Marions L. Effectiveness and acceptability of home use of misoprostol for medical abortion up to 10 weeks of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;102(5):541–8.

Chen MJ, Creinin MD. Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(1):12–21.

Ferguson I, Scott H. Systematic review of the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion in low- and middle-income countries. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(12):1532–42.e2.

Akter S, et al. Termination of unwanted pregnancy by medication (mifepristone and misoprostol). Sch Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;7(4):148–54.

Ngamjarus C, Pattanittum P. n4Studies [mobile application]. Version 2.3. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University; 2024. Available from: App Store.

Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1995.

Ngamjarus C. Sample size calculation for health science research. 1st ed. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University Printing House; 2021.

Raymond EG, Shannon C, Weaver MA, Winikoff B. First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013;87(1):26–37.

Kapp N, Eckersberger E, Lavelanet A, Rodriguez MI. Medical abortion in the late first trimester: a systematic review. Contraception. 2019;99(2):77–86.

Løkeland M, Iversen OE, Dahle GS, Nappen MH, Ertzeid L, Bjørge L. Medical abortion at 63 to 90 days of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;115(5):962-968.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Thongchumnum W. Success Rate of Mifepristone Combined with Misoprostol in Termination of Unwanted Pregnancy at Vachira Phuket Hospital. MNST Med J [internet]. 2025 Dec. 30 [cited 2026 Jan. 3];9(2):146-58. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MNSTMedJ/article/view/285004