Effect of Silane-Containing Universal Adhesive on a Microshear Bond Strength for the Repair of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic with Resin Composite
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare a microshear bond strength for the repair of treated lithium disilicate ceramic surface with resin composite.
Materials and Methods: A lithium disilicate ceramic specimens were prepared and surface roughening with diamond bur, then randomly allocated into 4 study groups (n=20/group) with different surface treatments as follows; group 1: 5% Hydrofluoric acid and Scotchbond universal plus (HU), group 2: 5% Hydrofluoric acid, Monobond N and Scotchbond universal plus (HSU), group 3: 5% Hydrofluoric acid, Monobond N and Adper Singlebond2 (HSB) and group 4: 37% Phosphoric acid and Scotchbond universal plus (PU). All the specimens were restored with resin composite and then subjected to 10,000 cycles of thermocycling. All specimens were subjected to microshear bond strength test with universal testing machine.
Results: The results for this study showed that group 2 (HSU) had the highest mean of the microshear bond strength value (17.55±3.09 MPa). Moreover, group 2 had significantly higher mean of the microshear bond strength value than group 1 (HU) and group 3 (HSB) (p<0.001) which were 10.60±2.06 MPa and 10.46±3.03 MPa, respectively. For group 4 (PU), all the resin composites had pretest failure before finished the thermocycling.
Conclusion: In conclusion, from this study the surface treatment of lithium disilicate ceramic with 5% hydrofluoric acid, Monobond N and Scotchbond universal plus showed the significantly highest mean of microshear bond strength value (p<0.001).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการลงตีพิมพ์ในวิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์เฉพาะของคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใด ๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร จากคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นก่อนเท่านั้น
References
Zarone F, Di Mauro MI, Ausiello P, Ruggiero G, Sorrentino R. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):134.
Abdulrahman S, Von See Mahm C, Talabani R, Abdulateef D. Evaluation of the clinical success of four different types of lithium disilicate ceramic restorations: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):625.
Romanini-Junior JC, Kumagai RY, Ortega LF, Rodrigues JA, Cassoni A, Hirata R, et al. Adhesive/silane application effects on bond strength durability to a lithium disilicate ceramic. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(4):1–6.
Yao C, Yu J, Wang Y, Tang C, Huang C. Acidic pH weakens the bonding effectiveness of silane contained in universal adhesives. Dent Mater. 2018;34(5):809–18.
Yao C, Ahmed MH, De Grave L, Yoshihara K, Mercelis B, Okazaki Y, et al. Optimizing glass-ceramic bonding incorporating new silane technology in an experimental universal adhesive formulation. Dent Mater. 2021;37(5):894–904.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–60.
Robbins JW. Intraoral repair of the fractured porcelain restoration. Oper Dent. 1998;23(4): 203-07.
Phana FG, Rezai SM, Ahmadian L. The Influence of Ceramic Surface Treatments on the Micro‐shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to IPS Empress 2. J Prosthodont. 2008;17(5):409–14.
Özcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair system. Dent Mater. 2009;25(12):1477–83.
Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Critical appraisal. To bevel or not in anterior composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;17(4):264.
Pameijer CH, Louw NP, Fischer D. Repairing fractured porcelain: how surface preparation affects shear force resistance. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127(2):203–9.
Swank HM, Motyka NC, Bailey CW, Vandewalle KS. Bond strength of resin cement to ceramic with simplified primers and pretreatment solutions. Gen Dent. 2018;66(5):33–7.
Tarateeraseth T, Thamrongananskul N, Kraisintu P, Somyhokwilas S, Klaisiri A, Sriamporn T. Effect of different types of silane coupling agents on the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate glass ceramic and resin cement. J Int Dent Med Res. 2020;13(3):836–42.
De Carvalho RLA, Kimpara ET, Bresciani E, Valera MC, Melo RM. Effect of thermocycling aging on the flexural strength of feldspathic ceramic. Braz Dent Sci. 2018;21(3):315–9.
Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedure for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89–99.
Leelaponglit S, Maneenacarith A, Wutikhun T, Klaisiri A. The various silane agents in universal adhesives on repair strength of resin composite to resin composite. J Compos Sci. 2023;7(1):7.
Awad MM, Alhalabi F, Alshehri A, Salem MA, Alqahtani A, Alghannam S, et al. Silane-containing universal adhesives influence resin-ceramic microtensile bond strength. Coatings. 2023; 13(2):477.
Golub AA, Zubenko AI, Zhmud B V. γ-APTES Modified Silica Gels: The structure of the surface layer. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1996;179(2):482–7.
Xiong M, Zhang K, Chen Y. ATRP of 3-(triethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate and preparation of “stable” gelable block copolymers. Eur Polym J. 2008; 44(11):3835–41.
Kalavacharla V, Lawson N, Ramp L, Burgess J. Influence of etching protocol and silane treatment with a universal adhesive on lithium disilicate bond strength. Oper Dent. 2015; 40(4):372–8.
Elkassas D, Zaghloul H, Haridy MF. Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(1):44–52.
Cardenas AM, Siqueira F, Hass V, Malaquias P, Gutierrez MF, Reis A, et al. Effect of MDP-containing silane and adhesive used alone or in combination on the long-term bond strength and chemical interaction with lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(3):203-12.
Passia N, Lehmann F, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Tensile bond strength of different universal adhesive systems to lithium disilicate ceramic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;146(10):729–34.
3M Oral care. 3MTM ScotchbondTM Universal Plus Adhesive Technical Product Profile [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 14]. Available from: https:// www.3m.com/ 3M/en_US/p/d/b5005223012/
Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshihara K, Matsumoto T, Minagi S. Does acid etching morphologically and chemically affect lithium disilicate glass ceramic surfaces? J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2017;15(1):93-100.
Huang BR, Wang XY, Gao XJ. Effects of different surface treatments on ceramic repairs with composite. Chin J Dent Res. 2013;16(2):111–7.
Nimsomboon T, Nimsomboon N. Hydrofluoric acid. Thai J Hosp Pharm. 2022;32(1):28–38.
Özcan M, Allahbeickaraghi A, Dundar M. Possible hazardous effects of hydrofluoric acid and recommendations for treatment approach: A review. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;16(1):15–23.
Loomans BA, Mine A, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans M, et al. Hydrofluoric acid on dentin should be avoided. Dent Mater. 2010; 26(7):643–9.
