Clinical Evaluation of A Thai Dental Inventive Light Activated Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Liner Under Resin Composite Restorations

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: Feb 28, 2023
Keywords:
Clinical study Liner Resin-modified glass ionomer Embaze Vitrebond

Main Article Content

Ratcha Raksakmanut
College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani.
Viracha Vachiramon
College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani
La-ongthong Vajrabhaya
College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani.
Suwanna Korsuwannawong
Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University.
Pasutha Thunyakitpisal
Institute of Dentistry, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical used of resin-modified glass ionomer; Embaze produced by Research Unit Herbal Medicine Biomaterial and Material for Dental Treatment, Chulalongkorn University compared to an imported commercial resin modified glass ionomer; VitrebondTM. Twenty volunteers with age range between 19-62 years old presented with class I (12 cavities) or II (8 cavities). Volunteers were recruited and evaluated preoperative clinical and radiographic examination. Carious lesions with depth more than 1.5 mm from DEJ were randomly divided into two groups (10 volunteers per group) in accordance with tested glass ionomers. After caries removal under rubber dam isolation, a resin modified glass ionomer was randomly applied on the pulpal wall of a cavity and filled with resin composite. Post-operative follows up 1 and 7 day were performed by phone call. Recall examinations were scheduled after 3 and 6 months respectively. The clinical examination both percussion and palpation including radiographic examination were conducted in comparing with the pre-treatment records. No significant difference in postoperative pain was found between the two groups.  Lining cavities with resin-modified glass ionomer, a Thai dental invention (Embaze) demonstrated no significant difference in symptom on percussion and palpation compared with VitrebondTM. The radiographs in both pre-treatment and post-treatment groups were not significant different (p>0.05). In conclusion, the clinical used of the Thai dental inventive resin modified glass ionomer (Embaze) demonstrated treatment outcomes not different from the imported commercial glass ionomer.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Raksakmanut R, Vachiramon V, Vajrabhaya L- ongthong, Korsuwannawong S, Thunyakitpisal P. Clinical Evaluation of A Thai Dental Inventive Light Activated Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Liner Under Resin Composite Restorations. Khon Kaen Dent J [Internet]. 2023 Feb. 28 [cited 2024 May 18];26(1):10-21. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KDJ/article/view/255347
Issue
Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023): Jan-April
Section
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการลงตีพิมพ์ในวิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์เฉพาะของคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใด ๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร จากคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นก่อนเท่านั้น

Share |

References

Bicalho AA, Pereira RD, Zanatta RF, Franco SD, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, et al. Incremental filling technique and composite material. Part I: cuspal deformation, bond strength, and physical properties. Oper Dent 2014;39(2):E71-82.

Bicalho AA, Pereira RD, Zanatta RF, Franco SD, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, et al. Incremental filling technique and composite material. Part II: shrinkage and shrinkage stress. Oper Dent 2014;39(2):E83-92.

Soares CJ, Faria-e-Silva AL, Rodrigues MP, Vilela ABF, Pfeifer CS, Tantbirojn D, et al. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins and resin cements-what do we need to know? Braz Oral Res 2017;31(suppl):e62.

Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S. In Vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2011;36(2):213-21.

Karaman E, Ozgunaltay G. Polymerization shrinkage of different types of composite resins and microleakage with and without liner in class II cavities. Oper Dent 2014;39(3):325-31.

Sampaio PC, de Almeida Junior AA, Francisconi LF, Casas-Apayco LC, Pereira JC, Wang L, et al. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of class I cavity walls after thermocycling. Oper Dent 2011;36(4):403-12.

Charoenkit M, Pumpaluk P. A micro-computed tomography study of internal gap with and without resin-modified glass-ionomer cement liner under occlusal resin composite restoration. M Dent J 2020;40(2): 159-64.

Azevedo LM, Casas-apayco LC, Villavicencio Espinoza CA, Wang L, Navarro MFL, et al. Effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement lining and composite layering technique on the adhesive interface of lateral wall. J Appl Oral Sci 2015;23(3):315-20.

Akpata ES, Sadiq W. Post operative sensitivity in glass ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composite. Am J Dent 2001;14(1):34-8.

Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133(2):229-31.

Schenkel AB, Veitz AK. Dental cavity liners for class I and class II resin-based composite restorations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3(3):CD010526.doi:10.1002/14651858.DC010526. pub3.PMID:30834516.

Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified glass ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized clinical trial. J Investig Clin Dent 2011;2(1):63-9.

Banomyong D, Harold Messer. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin composite restorations. J Investig Clin Dent 2013;4(4):265-70.

Vural UK, Gokalp S, Kiremitci. Effect of cavity lining on the restoration of root surface carious lesions: a split-mouth, 5-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24(2):979-89.

Schenkel AB, Peltz ID, Keenan AV. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(10): CD010526.

Banerjee A, Frencken JE, Schwendicke F, Innes NPT. Contemporary operative caries management: consensus recommendations on minimally invasive caries removal. Br Dent J 2017;223(3):215-22.

Duque C, Negrini TD, Sacono NT, Spolidorio DMP, Costa CAD, Herbling J. Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal. Clin Oral Invest 2009;13:465-71.

Lynch CD, Mcconnell RJ, Wilson NHF. Posterior composites: The future for restoring posterior teeth? Prim Dent 2014;3:49-53.

Blum IR, Wilson NHF. An end to linings under posterior composites? J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149(3):209-13.

Blum IR, Wilson NHF. Consequences of no more linings under composite restorations. Br Dent J 2019;226(10):749-52.

Righolt AJ, Jevdjevic M, Marcenes W, Listl S. Global-, regional-, and country-level economic impacts of dental diseases in 2015. J Dent Res 2018;97(5):501-7.

Medical devices intelligence unit [homepage on the internet]. Available from: http://medicaldevices. oie.go.th/ImEx_ProductType.asp.

อัตราแลกเปลี่ยนเฉลี่ยของธนาคารพาณิชย์ในกรุงเทพ มหานคร: ธนาคารแห่งประเทศไทย. Available from: https://www.bot.or.th>App>statistics)

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9917-2. Dentistry water-based cements part 2 resin-modified cements. 1988.

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9917-2. Dentistry water-based cements part 2 resin-modified cements. 2010.

Thunyakitpisal P, Jiemsirilers S, Saravari O, Kashima DP, Thunyakitpisal N, Srisuwan P, et al. Working time, depth of curve, flexural strength and cytotoxicity of an exponential resin modified glass ionomer cement prototype. J Dent Assoc Thai 2015;65(3):189-98.

Banlunara W, Songsiripadapboon S, Jiemsirilers S, Saravari O, Kashima DP, Thunyakitpisal N, et al. Pulp-dentine complex response to RU-HBM1, a novel resin modified glass ionomer cement prototype, in deep cavity preparation of porcine teeth. Thai J Vet Med 2016;46(2):185-93.

Kenneth S, Douglas A, David M. Consort 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMC Medicine 2010;8:18.

Berkowitz GS, Horowitz AJ, Curro FA, Craig RG, Ship JA, Vena D, et al. Postoperative hypersensitivity in class I resin-based composite restorations in general practice: Interim results. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009;30(6):356-63.

Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13(1)50-7.

Endodontic Diagnosis. Endodontics: Colleagues for Excellence Fall 2013. Available from: www. aae.org/colleagues.

Duncan HF, Nagendrababu V, EI-Karim IA, Dummer PMH. Outcome measures to access the effectiveness of endodontic treatment for pulpitis and apical periodontitis for use in the development of European Society of Endodontology (ESE) S3 level clinical practice guidelines: a protocol. Int Endod J 2021;54(5):646-54.

Carvalho TS, Lussi. Age-related morphological, histological and functional changes in teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2017;44(4):291-8.

Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dent Mater 2008;24(12):1702-8.

Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater 2016;7(3):16. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jfb7030016.

Liang C, Byoung IS. Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of resin-free and resin-modified direct pulp capping materials: A state-of-the-art review. Dent Mater J 2017;36(1):1-7.

Dursun E, Nguyen JF, Tang ML, Attal JP, Sadoun M. HEMA release and degree of conversion from a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after various delays of light activation. Dent Mat 2016;32(5):640-5.