Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution and Fatigue Life of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Incisor Restored with Cast Post and Fiber-Reinforced Composite Post with all Ceramic Crown

Main Article Content

Tuangrat Vivattanakulpanit
Yotsakorn Pratumwal
Danai Yodsuwan

Abstract

The study of stress distribution and fatigue life of endodontically treated mandibular incisor restored with cast post and fiber-reinforced composite post with all-ceramic crown. Endodontically treated mandibular incisor underwent cone beam computed tomography assessment. The resin pattern for cast post, fiber-reinforced composite post and all-ceramic crown were scanned and converted into three-dimensional parametric solid models, then generated finite element models. A linear static structural analysis was performed to calculate stress distribution and fatigue life in different restoring configurations. The load of 65 N and 176 N applied at 30 degrees from vertical tooth axis on labial surface of the crown to simulate chewing force and maximum bite force. Recorded stress distribution was presented as diagrams and numerically as maximum values of von Mises stresses, then calculated fatigue life of endodontically treated mandibular incisor. For all models, the maximum von Mises stress values were found in all-ceramic crown. Tooth restored with cast post demonstrated greater stress level near apex of the post, while tooth restored with fiber-reinforced composite post showed stress distribution around cervical area. The study of fatigue life found no fatigue failure for both post systems. That means that, endodontically treated mandibular incisor restored with cast post and fiber-reinforced composite post with composite core demonstrated different stress distribution patterns. No damage was found on both types of post under chewing force and maximum bite force and could predict that fatigue failure under cyclical loads will not occur.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Vivattanakulpanit T, Pratumwal Y, Yodsuwan D. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution and Fatigue Life of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Incisor Restored with Cast Post and Fiber-Reinforced Composite Post with all Ceramic Crown. Khon Kaen Dent J [Internet]. 2022 Nov. 7 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];25(3):58-72. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KDJ/article/view/252660
Section
Articles
Share |

References

Stephen F. Rosenstiel, Martin F. Land, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. fifth, editor. Missouri: Elsevier; 2006.

Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post Placement and Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Literature Review. J Endod. 2004;30(5):289-301.

Tait CME, Ricketts DNJ, Higgins AJ. Restoration of the root-filled tooth: pre-operative assessment. Br Dent J. 2005;198(7):395-404.

Kjell Randow, Glantz P-O. On cantilever loading of vital and nonvital teeth An experimental clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1986;44(5): 271-7.

Caputo AA, P Standlee J. Pins and posts--why, when and how. Dent Clin North Am. 1976;20(2): 299-311.

Baba NZ. Contemporary restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 2013.

Hargreaves KM, Berman LH. Cohen's pathways of the pulp. Eleventh edition. ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016. xiv, 907.

Lassila LVJ, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Braz Dent J. 2004;20(1):29-36.

Angwarawong T. Restoration of endodonticcally trated teeth. 1st ed. Khon Kaen: KKU Printing house; 2020.

Marcos R, Kinder G, Alfredo E, Quaranta T, Correr G, Cunha L, et al. Influence of the Resin Cement Thickness on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Posts. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(5):592-8.

Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth: Post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(5): 611-9.

Yettram AL, Wright KW, Pickard HM. Finite element stress analysis of the crowns of normal and restored teeth. J Dent Res. 1976;55(6):1004-11.

Gurbuz T, Sengul F, Altun C. Finite element stress analysis of short-post core and over restorations prepared with different restorative materials. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(4):499-507.

Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016. viii, 879.

Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed: Mosby Elsevier; 2006.

Halpin JC, Kardos JL. The Halpin-Tsai equations: A review. Polym Eng Sci. 1976;16(5):344-52.

Ho HH, Chu FC, Stokes AN. Fracture behavior of human mandibular incisors following endodontic treatment and porcelain veneer restoration. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(3):260-4.

Kampe T, Haraldson T, Hannerz H, Carlsson GE. Occlusal perception and bite force in young subjects with and without dental fillings. Acta Odontol Scand. 1987;45(2):101-7.

Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand. 1977;35(6):297-303.

Bader Q, Njim E. Mean stress correction effects on the fatigue life behavior of steel alloys by using stress life approach theories. Int J Emerg Technol. 2014;14(4):50-8.

Agostinho Hernandez B, Paterno A, Antonio Capello Sousa E, Foschini C, editors. Fatigue Analysis of Dental Prostheses by Finite Element Method (FEM). ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; 2015 November 13-19, 2015; Houston, Texas.

Nalla RK, Imbeni V, Kinney JH, Staninec M, Marshall SJ, Ritchie RO. In vitro fatigue behavior of human dentin with implications for life prediction. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;66(1):10-20.

Toms SR, Eberhardt AW. A nonlinear finite element analysis of the periodontal ligament under orthodontic tooth loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(6):657-65.

Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(4):321-9.

Durmus G, Oyar P. Effects of post core materials on stress distribution in the restoration of mandibular second premolars: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):547-54.

Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. Finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of cast posts compared to glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(2):115-26.

Zhou L, Wang Q. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fiber posts: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2013;39(1): 11-5.

Qing H, Zhu Z, Chao Y, Zhang W. In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(2):93-8.

Varvara G, Perinetti G, Di Iorio D, Murmura G, Caputi S. In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and failure mode of internally restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors with differing heights of residual dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(5):365-72.

Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of structurally compromised canals restored with different dowel methods. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(4):312-6.

Rezaei Dastjerdi M, Amirian Chaijan K, Tavanafar S. Fracture resistance of upper central incisors restored with different posts and cores. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40(3):229-35.

Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(4):476-82.

Öztürk C, Polat S, Tunçdemir M, Gönüldas F, Seker E. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of root filled thin walled teeth restored with different post systems. Biomed J. 2019;42(1):53-8.

Makade CS, Meshram GK, Warhadpande M, Patil PG. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011;3(2):90-5.

Adanir N, Belli S. Stress analysis of a maxillary central incisor restored with different posts. Eur J Dent. 2007;1(2):67-71.

Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' science of dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Elsevier/Saunders; 2013. xiii, 571 p. p.

Völkel T. Scientific Documentation FRC Postec Plus. Ivoclar Vivadent. 2004:6.

Rosa RS, Balbinot CE, Blando E, Mota EG, Oshima HM, Hirakata L, et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties on three nanofilled composites. Stomatologija. 2012;14(4):126-30.

Yodsuwan D, Satitdethkunchorn A, Thongsmak P. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular incisor teeth restored with cast post versus fiber post. Khon Kaen Dent J. 2018;21.

Products and practical information Super-Bond C&B. Sun Medical. 2000;2.1.

Sarkis-Onofre R, Amaral Pinheiro H, Poletto-Neto V, Bergoli CD, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Randomized controlled trial comparing glass fiber posts and cast metal posts. J Dent. 2020;96(20):103334.

Garcia PP, Cappoani A, Schelbauer RS, Correr GM, Gonzaga CC. Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth. Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45(4):e49.

Rodriguez-Cervantes PJ, Sancho-Bru JL, Gonzalez-Lluch C, Perez-Gonzalez A, Barjau-Escribano A, Forner-Navarro L. Premolars restored with posts of different materials: fatigue analysis. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(6):881-6.

Baldissara P, Di Grazia V, Palano A, Ciocca L. Fatigue resistance of restored endodontically treated teeth: a multiparametric analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(1):25-7.

Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(5):529-36.

Hoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;47(2):177-81.

Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Cook SD. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1980;14(1):23-9.

Friedman CM, Sandrik JL, Heuer MA, Rapp GW. Composition and Mechanical Properties of Gutta-Percha Endodontic Points. J Dent Res. 1975;54(5):921-5.

Scientific Documentation IPS e.max®CAD. Physical properties: Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, 2005.06.

Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL, Craig RG. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis, Mo. ; London: Elsevier Mosby; 2006. xvii, 632.

Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater. 2005;21(8):709-15.

Ivoclar Vivadent. IPS e.max Scientific report. 2001-2017.

Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14(1):13-29.

Wu B, Fu Y, Shi H, Yan B, Lu R, Ma S, et al. Tensile testing of the mechanical behavior of the human periodontal ligament. BioMedical Engineering Online. 2018;17(1):172.

Miranda A, Rusyanti Y, Hendiani I, Dirgantara T, Metta P, Carolina DN. Computational Analysis of Resistance to Alveolar Bone Resorption of Osseointegrated Implant. Key Eng Mater. 2020;829:241-6.