Comparison of Leakage and Quality of Root Canal Filled with Single Cone Technique with Either Bioceramic Sealer or AH Plus Sealer after Post Space Preparation in the Difference Length of Gutta Percha Remaining
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aims of this study were to compare the bacterial leakage and to evaluate the obturation quality of root canals filled with single-cone technique using bio ceramic sealer and AH plus sealer after post space preparation with different remaining root canal fillings. Eighty-eight single-rooted mandibular premolars were equally prepared using rotary nickel–titanium files and divided into experimental groups (n=80) positive control group (n=4) and negative control group (n=4). In the experimental groups, all root canals were divided into 2 groups and obturated with single cone technique using either Bio Root RCS (n=40) or AH Plus sealer (n=40) and stored at 37oC for 7 days. The samples in each experimental group were divided into 4 subgroups (n=10) then prepared post space to the remaining apical root canal filling of 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm respectively. Bacterial leakage model using Enterococcus faecalis was employed for 60 days. Then, the apical obturation quality, at 1.5 mm apical root segments, was also evaluated by using a stereomicroscope. The results revealed that, with the remaining apical root canal fillings of 3 and 4 mm, Bio Root RCS group exhibited significantly premature bacterial leakage than AH Plus group (P<0.05), whereas the remaining apical root canal fillings of 1 and 2 mm were no significantly difference between 2 sealers. When compared the quality of the apical root filling at different levels, there was no significant difference in void volume between 2 sealers. At the remaining root canal filling material of 3 and4 mm after post space preparation, Bio root RCS exhibited faster bacterial leakage than AH plus, though the quality of the obturation was not different.
Article Details
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการลงตีพิมพ์ในวิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์เฉพาะของคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ต่อหรือเพื่อกระทำการใด ๆ จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร จากคณะทันตแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่นก่อนเท่านั้น
References
Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3(4):243-50.
Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52(1):28-35.
Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part II. Maintaining the apical seal. J Prosthodont 1995;4(1):51-3.
Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part III. Tooth preparation considerations. J Prosthodont 1995; 4(2):122-8.
Saunders W, Saunders E. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root‐canal therapy: a review. Dent Traumatol 1994;10(3):105-8.
Fuss Z, Lustig J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth: impact of operative procedures. J Endod 2001;27(1):46-8.
Metzger Z, Abramovitz R, Abramovitz I, Tagger M. Correlation between remaining length of root canal fillings after immediate post space preparation and coronal leakage. J Endod 2000;26(12):724-8.
Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, Garcia-Bernal D, Onate-Sanchez RE, Ortolani-Seltenerich PS, Forner L, Moraleda JM. Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells. Int Endod J 2017;50(1):67-76.
Jung S, Sielker S, Hanisch MR, Libricht V, Schafer E, Dammaschke T. Cytotoxic effects of four different root canal sealers on human osteoblasts. PLoS One 2018; 13(3):e0194467.
Siboni F, Taddei P, Zamparini F, Prati C, Gandolfi M. Properties of Bioroot RCS, a tricalcium silicate endodontic sealer modified with povidone and polycarboxylate. Int Endod J 2017;50:e120-e36.
Silva Almeida LH, Moraes RR, Morgental RD, Pappen FG. Are Premixed Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers Comparable to Conventional Materials? A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. J Endod 2017; 43(4):527-35.
Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod 2013;39(10):1281-6.
Atmeh AR, AlShwaimi E. The effect of heating time and temperature on epoxy resin and calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers. J Endod 2017;43(12):2112-8.
Simon S, Flouriot AC. BioRoot RCS a new biomaterial for root canal filling. International Dentistry African Edition [serial on the Internet] 2016 [cited 2019 June 26]; 6(2):[14-20 pp.]. Available from: http://www.modern dentistrymedia.com/mar_april2016/simon.pdf.
Viapiana R, Moinzadeh AT, Camilleri L, Wesselink PR, Tanomaru Filho M, Camilleri J. Porosity and sealing ability of root fillings with gutta-percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods. Int Endod J 2016;49(8):774-82.
Veríssimo DM, do Vale MS. Methodologies for assessment of apical and coronal leakage of endodontic filling materials: a critical review. J Oral Sci 2006; 48(3):93-8.
Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32(2):271-5.
Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58(5):589-99.
Corrêa ACP, Cecchin D, de Almeida JFA, de Almeida Gomes BPF, Zaia AA, Ferraz CCR. Sodium thiosulfate for recovery of bond strength to dentin treated with sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2016;42(2):284-8.
De-Deus G. Research that matters-root canal filling and leakage studies. Int Endod J 2012;45(12):1063-4.
Ricucci D, Gröndahl K, Bergenholtz G. Periapical status of root-filled teeth exposed to the oral environment by loss of restoration or caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90(3):354-9.
Torabinejad M, Ung B, Kettering JD. In vitro bacterial penetration of coronally unsealed endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1990;16(12):566-9.
Yanpiset K, Banomyong D, Chotvorrarak K, Srisatjaluk RL. Bacterial leakage and micro-computed tomography evaluation in round-shaped canals obturated with bioceramic cone and sealer using matched single cone technique. Restor Dent Endod [serial on the Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 June 25]; 43(3): [about 12 p.]Available from:https://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.5395/rde.2018.43.e30.
Reyhani M, Ghasemi N, Rahimi S, Milani A, Barhaghi M, Azadi A. Apical microleakage of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex sealers in association with immediate and delayed post space preparation: a bacterial leakage study. Minerva Stomatol 2015;64(3):129-34.
Camilleri J. Sealers and warm gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod 2015;41(1):72-8.
Mitchell C, Douglas W. Comparison of the porosity of hand-mixed and capsulated glass-ionomer luting cements. Biomaterials 1997;18(16):1127-31.
Camilleri J. Will bioceramics be the future root canal filling materials? Current Oral Health Reports 2017; 4(3):228-38.
Camps J, Jeanneau C, El Ayachi I, Laurent P, About I. Bioactivity of a calcium silicate-based endodontic cement (BioRoot RCS): interactions with human periodontal ligament cells in vitro. J Endod 2015;41.
Long J, Kreft J, Camilleri J. Antimicrobial and ultrastructural properties of root canal filling materials exposed to bacterial challenge. J Dent 2020;93:103283.
Collado-Gonzalez M, Garcia-Bernal D, Onate-Sanchez RE, Ortolani-Seltenerich PS, Lozano A, Forner L, et al. Biocompatibility of three new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers on human periodontal ligament stem cells. Int Endod J 2017;50(9):875-84.