A COMPARISON OF PHYSIOLOGY RESPONSE, MOVEMENT DEMANDS, AND TECHNICAL SKILL DURING BASKETBALL SMALL-SIDE GAME TRAINING WITH ONE AND TWO-HOOPS FORMAT
Keywords:
Basketball Small-Sided Games, Physiological Response, Movement Demand, Technical SkillAbstract
The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the physiological response, movement demand,and technical skill characteristics encountered during a basketball small-sided games (SSG) with one hoop and two hoops format. Twelve male basketball players (18–22 yrs) from Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng-sean campus were recruited to participate. The subjects were assigned into four balanced teams with 3 players in each team. All players performed small-sided games training 3v3 on a half court (14x15m) consisting of 2 x5
min duration with 30-second active recovery between bouts, each team played the two SSG (one hoop and two hoop) against each other in a random order. During the different SSG formats, Heart Rate and speed in each activity were monitored in every player and were measured using the Polar Team Pro System. The games were video recorded and afterwards the technical demands were notated with Dartfish ProS software. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and t-test dependent at the 0.05 level of significance.
The results show that the SSG with one hoop significantly higher heart rate values compared with the SSG with two hoops (p < 0.05) and the total distance covered was lower during SSG with one hoop than SSG with two hoops (p<.05). Furthermore, the number of two-point shooting was significantly lower during SSG with one hoop compared with SSG with two hoops (p < 0.05) while the number of three-point shooting was higher during SSG with one hoop than SSG with two hoops (p<.05). These data suggest that two SSG formats could be prescribed for squad management to target conditioning stimuli for specific basketball players
(Journal of Sports Science and Technology 2024; 24(2):47-60)
(Received: 18 April 2024, Revised: 20 August 2024, Accepted: 28 August 2024)
KEYWORD: Basketball Small-Sided Games/ Physiological Response/ Movement Demand/Technical Skill
*Corresponding author: Niromlee MAKAJE
Faculty of Sports Science, Kasetsart University Kamphaeng-Sean Campus,
Nakorn Phatom, 73140, THAILAND
E-mail:niromlee.m@ku.th
References
Montgomery PG, Pyne DB, Minahan CL. The physical and physiological demands of basketball training and competition. International journal of sports physiology and performance. 2010;5(1):75-86.
McInnes S, Carlson J, Jones C, McKenna M. The physiological load imposed on basketball players during competition. Journal of sports sciences. 1995;13(5):387-97.
Abdelkrim NB, El Fazaa S, El Ati J. Time–motion analysis and physiological data of elite under-19-year-old basketball players during competition. British journal of sports medicine. 2007;41(2):69-75.
Conte D, Favero TG, Lupo C, Francioni FM, Capranica L, Tessitore A. Time-motion analysis of Italian elite women's basketball games: individual and team analyses. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2015;29(1):144-50.
Klusemann MJ, Pyne DB, Foster C, Drinkwater EJ. Optimising technical skills and physical loading in small-sided basketball games. Journal of sports sciences. 2012;30(14):1463-71.
Castagna C, Impellizzeri FM, Chaouachi A, Ben Abdelkrim N, Manzi V. Physiological responses to ball-drills in regional level male basketball players. Journal of sports sciences. 2011;29(12):1329-36.
Delextrat A, Kraiem S. Heart-rate responses by playing position during ball drills in basketball. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2013;8(4):410-8.
Sampaio J, Abrantes C, Leite N. Power, heart rate and perceived exertion responses to 3x3 and 4x4 basketball small-sided games. Revista de Psicología del Deporte. 2009;18(3):0463-467.
McCormick BT, Hannon JC, Newton M, Shultz B, Miller N, Young W. Comparison of physical activity in small-sided basketball games versus full-sided games. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2012;7(4):689-97.
Atl H, Köklü Y, Alemdaroglu U, Koçak FÜ. A comparison of heart rate response and frequencies of technical actions between half-court and full-court 3-a-side games in high school female basketball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013;27(2):352-6.
Bangsbo J, Iaia FM, Krustrup P. The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test: a useful tool for evaluation of physical performance in intermittent sports. Sports medicine. 2008;38:37-51.
Borg G. Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales: Human kinetics; 1998.
Montgomery PG. 3x3 Basketball Competition: Physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. Journal of Physical Fitness, Medicine & Treatment in Sports. 2018;5(3).
Scherr J, Wolfarth B, Christle JW, Pressler A, Wagenpfeil S, Halle M. Associations between Borg’s rating of perceived exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity. European journal of applied physiology. 2013;113:147-55.
Sánchez-Sánchez J, Carretero M, Valiente J, Gonzalo-Skok O, Sampaio J, Casamichana D. Heart rate response and technical demands of different small-sided game formats in young female basketballers.[Respuesta de la frecuencia cardíaca y demanda técnica en diferentes formatos de juegos reducidos realizados por jugadoras jóvenes de baloncesto]. RICYDE Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte doi: 105232/ricyde. 2017;14(51):55-70.
