Incidence of Adverse Reaction in whole blood donation and plateletpheresis donation at Central Chest Institute of Thailand and mobile units obtained by Line Official Account within 2 days after donation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The incidences of adverse donor reactions (ADR) after whole-blood donation and plateletpheresis was important data to solve problem. This study was to develop monitoring measure in order to cover ADR which occurred 2 days after donation. The donors were asked to answer the questionnaires recording their ADR within 2 days after blood donation and sent back by Line official Account (Line OA), between September 1,2021 to January 31,2022. The data were managed through Line OA and analyzed by using Excel. The SPSS program was used to perform chi-square test. The level of statistical significance was determined at p-value<0.05. There were 1,299 donors (14.82% of 1,896) who participated in this study. Specifically, 1,030 (83.81%) donate in-house unit and 199(10.5%) at the mobile unit. The ADR occurred to 224 donors (18.23%), 135 donors (60.27%) and 89 donors (39.73%) of total donors female and male donors,respectively. The ADR in-house unit occurred more frequent than at the mobile unit, 188 (83.93%) and 36 (16.07%), respectively. The ADR occurred to 192 (85.71%) whole blood donors and 32 (14.29%) plasma-platelet apheresis donors. Among 1,299 donors 142 (11.55%) developed local ADR. The most common local ADR was mild hematoma/bruise which occurred to 116 (67.44%) reactions and 110 (8.95%) developed vasovagal reactions.The most VVR was mild vasovagal reaction which occurred to 111 (88.1%) reactions. Among 224 ADR donors 208 (92.86%) donors were experienced ADR. The prevalence of ADR by donor sent back the questionnaires by Line OA is effective in monitoring of ADR.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Phikulsod S, Charoonruangrit U, Chiewsilp P, et all. Eds. Standards for blood banks and transfusion service. 4th ed. Kandee Printing 2015;4-11.
Phikulsod S, Chiewsilp P, et all. Eds. Guildeline on Hemovigilance. 1st eds. Limited Partnership higher education 2015;1-48.
Newman BH, Pichette S, Pichette D, Dzaka E. Adverse effects in blood donors after whole-blood donation: a study of 1,000 blood donors interviewed 3 weeks after whole-blood donation. Transfusion 2003;43:598-603.
Crocco AD, Elia D. Adverse reaction during voluntary donation of blood and/or blood components. A statistic-epidemiological study. Transfusion 2007;53:143-52.
World Health Organization: Quality Management Training for Blood Transfusion Service,2005.
Tamasolo P, Bravo M, Kamel H. Time course of vasovagal syncope with whole blood donation. Trasfusion 2010;5:52-8.
Ongtilanont K, Jeannuntajit I, Rodprad Ub N, Manomaicharern N, Thong-Ou C, Chunaka C. Adverse reactions in blood donor at National Blood Center, Thai Red Cross Society and mobile units. J Hematol Transfus Med 2012; 22: 223-9.
Newman BH. Management of young blood donors. Transfus Med Hemother 2014; 41: 284-95.
Vossbeck-Elsebush, A.N., Gerlach, A.L. The relation between disgust-sensitivity, blood-injection-injury fears and vasovagal symptoms in blood donors: Disgust sensitivity cannot explain fainting or blood donation-related symptoms. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 2012; 43: 607-13.
Chiewsilp P, Phikulsod S, Ongtilanont K, Jeannantajit I, Dejhutsadin P, Paryyawatee S. Adverse reactions to blood donation obtain by the questionairs. J Hematol Transfus Med 2015: 25: 9-24.
Musikaphan S, Moudeaud D, Boorananayot S, Rujirojindakul P. Incidence of adverse reaction in whole blood donors obtained by telephone interviewing within 24 hours after donation. J Hematol Transfus Med 2016; 26: 27-33.
Biswas A.D, Afroz T, Hoque A. Prevalence of post donation adverse donor reactions in a Medical College Hospital at Dhaka. Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion 2019; 9: 241-47.
Onkaew N, Wongpinunwatana N. the study of the influential factors of the consumers towards the products and services advertise in Line official Accont.JISB.2015;10 :43-58.
Changtham S. Characteristics of Line official account affecting user’s behavior. Master thesis, M.B.A. Pathumthani: Rajamangala University of technology Thanyaburi; 2015.
Rodleartngam P. Influence of Source and Message via LINE official Accounts Affecting Brand Recognition and Purchase Intention of the Organizations Supporting LINE of Consumers in Bangkok. Master thesis, M.B.A. Bangkok:Bangkok University; 2014.
Chanchaipattana T. Expectation and Satisfaction on “Line” application. Master thesis, M.A. Pathumthani: Thammasat university; 2013.
Phimsiriphanich S. Increase sales with Line official Account. Bangkok: You Tomorrow; 2019.
Mahbub-UI-Alam M, Shamim Hyder M, Karim Khan M, Answarul Islam M. Adverse donor reaction during and immediately after venesection.TJA 2007; 20:39-47.
Wee J Joung ES, SeoHS. The effect of the blood donating environment on vasovagal reaction. Korean J Blood Transfus 2007: 18:39-48.
Kaewkart S, Srivichai M, Leetrakool N. Adverse Reactions in Blood Donors at Blood bank, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital and Mobile units. J Hematol Transfus Med 2018;28.
Meen M, Iindal T. Complications associated with blood donations in a blood bank at a tertiary care hospital. J clin and DiagnRes 2014; 8: JC05-jc08.
Newman BH. Arm complications after manual whole blood donation and their impact. Transfus Med Rev 2013; 27.44-9.
Agnihotri N, Marwaha N, Sharma RR. Analysis of adverse events and predisposing factors in Voluntary and replacement whole blood donors: A study from north India. Asian J transfuse sci. 2012; 6(2): 155-60.
Newman BH, Graves S. A study of 178 consecutive vasovagal syncopal reactions from the perspective of safety. Transfusion 2001; 41:1475-9.