Comparison of Automated and Manual Reticulocyte Count Determination

Authors

  • Viroj Wiwanitkit Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Reticulocyte count

Abstract

Objective: To compare automated and manual reticulocyte count determination. Study Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkom University. Methods: Eighty blood samples from both inactive and active erythropoiesis states were collected for the comparative study of reticulocyte count determination. All samples were determined by two methods-manual
and automated reticulocyte count. The technicians who did the test were blinded for the other method results. Average values from reticulocyte count determination were calculated, compared then analyzed. Results: The average reticulocyte count values by manual method was 2.8992.59%. The average reticulocyte count values by automated method was 2.24+2.30%. It revealed that there
was no significant difference between reticulocyte count values deternined by both methods (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The reticulocyte count results from automated and semi-automated methods are not significant different. The manual reticulocyte count in routine service is recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bessis M. Blood Smear Reinterpreted. Berlin: Spinger-Verlag, 1977.

Davis BH, Bigelow NC. Automated reticulocyte analysis: Clinical practice and associated new parameters. Hematol/Oncol Clin North Am 1994;8:617-30.

Fishchbach F. Blood studies. In: Fishchbach F, ed. Laboratory & Diagnostic Tests. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1996:23-146.

Heil W, Koberstein R, Zawta B. Reference Ranges for Adult and Children Pre-Analytical Considerations. 1st ed. Germany: Boehringer, 1998.

Peebles DA, Hochberg A, Clarke T'D. Analysis of manual reticulocyte counting. Am J Clin Pathol 1981;76:713-7.

Brugnara C, Hipp Mi, Trving PJ, et al. Automated reticulocyte counting and measurement of reticulocyte cellular indices: Evaluation of Miles H*3 blood analyzer. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;102:623-32.

อุกริช รุจิตระการโชติกุล. เศรษฐศาสตร์การบริหารงาน ห้องปฏิบัติการ. วารสารเทคนิคการแพทย์เชียงใหม่ 2540,30(Suppl 1):S108-10.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-30

Issue

Section

นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ (Original article)