Comparative Study of Three Multiple Linear Regression Software Programs
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Two commercial and one free online multiple linear analysis programs were tested with simulated potentiometric titration data for accuracy in determination of equivalent point, dissociation constant and partition coefficient. In many cases, analysis of simulated data yielded inaccurate results, possibly due to programming algorithms. This study highlights a need for regression programs to be tested with simulated data to assess their limitations.
Article Details
In the case that some parts are used by others The author must Confirm that obtaining permission to use some of the original authors. And must attach evidence That the permission has been included
References
Billo EJ. Excel® for chemists a comprehensive uide. 2nd ed. New York (NY): J. Wiley & ons; 2001.
Gran G. Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric titration. Part II. Analyst 1952;77: 661-670.
Keeling KB, Pavur RJ. A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages. Compt Statist Data Anal 2007; 51: 381-431.
Microsoft Excel 2007 [multiple linear regression], Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, VA.
Minitab Statistical Software Release 15 (2005-2008). [Multiple Linear Regression, ANOVA], State College, PA: Minitab, Inc.
Pathipvanich M, Rujirawat S, Sukbuntherng J. Quantitative determination of weak acidic drugs in mixed solvent using Gran’s method. Th J Pharm Sci 1990; 15: 33-42.
Rossatti FJC, Rossatt H. Potentiometic titrationsusing Gran’s plots. J Chem Ed 1965; 42:75-378.
Ryan TP. Modern regression methods. New York(NY): J. Wiley & Sons; 1997.