Incidences of Adverse Drug Reactions due to Systemic Antibiotics from ADRs System at a Community Hospital

Main Article Content

Sarinya Nakdee
Suvapee Montreepo
Thanatcha Songmuang
Sawaeng Watcharathanakij
Nonglek Kunawaradisai

Abstract

Introduction:   Adverse  drug  reactions  (ADRs)  is  one  of  the  problem  occurred  during  patient care and it can lead to a loss in patient health status and loss in cost for economics.  The objectives of this  study  was  to  determine  the  incidence  of  adverse  drug  reactions  for  systemic antibiotics  used  in  a community  hospital  from  1st January  -  31st December,  2015. Methods:  This  retrospective  study  was conducted and data were obtained from patients` computerized database in the hospital. Patient collecting sheet  was  used  to  collect  data  while  Naranjo`s  algorithm  was  used  to  identify  the  causing  ADRs. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data. Results: There were 10,121 patients receiving systemic antibiotics and 57 developed ADRs. The incidence of ADRs was 563.19 per 100,000 patients. Of those 57  cases,  ADRs  were  categorized  by  each  class  of  antibiotics.  The  reactions  most  found  in Cephalosporins 61.40% (35 cases), Penicillins 14.04% (8 cases), Fluoroquinolone 7.02% (4 cases), and Macrolides 7.02% (4 cases).  Moreover, it was found that ADRs were commonly reported in skin 80.70% (46 cases)  and  cardiovascular  system  7.02%  (4  cases).  In  terms  of  severity,  ADRs  were  reported  as non-serious 80.07% (46 cases); increasing the duration of treatment 14.03% (8 cases), disability 3.51% (2 cases) and fatal 1.75% (1 case).  ADRs were classified by causality assessment and it revealed that 15.79% (9 cases) was ipossiblej and  84.21% (48 cases) was iprobablej. Conclusion:  Cephalosporins had  the  highest  incidence  of  ADRs comparing  to  others.   Therefore,  pharmacovigilance  and  adverse reactions detection system is highly important to decrease any loss to the patients.

Article Details

Section
Pharmaceutical Practice

References

Dhar K. SA, Gaur P., Goel R., et al. Pattern of adverse drug reactions to antibiotics commonly prescribed in department of medicine and pediatrics in a tertiary care teaching hospital. J App PharmSci. 2015; 5(4): 78-82.

Ghamar TK, Fatemeh F, Zahra P, et al. Adverse reactions to antibiotics in hospitalized Iranian children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008; 41: 160-164.

Health Product Vigilance Center. SpontaneousReports of Adverse Drug Reaction2015. Health Product Vigilance Center (HPVC) [Internet]. 2015.[cited 2016 Sep 11]. Available from: http://thaihpvc.fda.moph.go.th/thaihvc/Public/News/uploads/hpvc_1_3_4_100538.pdf.

Khan FA, Huda N, Mishra H, et al. A prospective study on prevalence of adverse drug reactions due to antibiotics usage in otolaryngology department of a tertiary care hospital in North India. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 2:548-53.

Kankaewla P and Permsuwan U. The direct cost of adverse drug reactions in patients. TJHP.2005; 15(1):30-39.

Renuka CV, Darling C. Retrospective analysis of adverse drug reactions induced by antibiotics in tertiary care centre. WJPR. 2014; 3(10): 1051-5.

Songsiripan R.Incidence and cost impact of adverse drug reactions in the medical ward patients at Hatyai Hospital.Songkla.Songkla University; 2002.