To identify and characterize an opioids-related adverse drug event (ADE) using naloxone as a trigger tool and to determine the causes of preventable ADEs

Authors

  • Cheeratikarn Phithakham Pharmacy Division, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand
  • Thanisa Kritsadathan Pharmacy Division, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand
  • Worakamol Tiyaprasertkul Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  • Ratcharin Phothikun Nursing division, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai HospitalFaculty of MedicineChiang Mai University

Keywords:

adverse drug event, trigger tool, naloxone

Abstract

Objective To identify and characterize an opioids-related adverse drug event (ADE) using naloxone as a trigger tool and to determine the causes of preventable ADEs.

Methods An observation retrospective study was conducted by reviewing medical records of hospitalized patients who received naloxone from January 2015 to December 2016 at the University hospital. The researchers systemically reviewed the medical records to identify ADE cases which were further reviewed to determine whether they were preventable, and their causes as well as a severity rating.

Results Out of the one hundred and eighty seven-cases reviewed, 31 events were identifi ed as ADEs (16.58 %). The incidence of opioids-related ADEs was 0.19 events per 100 admissions and 0.16 events per 1,000 patient-days. Twenty (64.52%) out of 31 events were identi fi ed as preventable ADEs. The severity of 19 events were classi fi ed as E. Inappropriate opioid doses was the most causes of preventable ADEs, which occurred during the prescribing phase (11 events, 55%) The majority of ADEs cases were female (70.97%) and the median age was 65 years (55-74). Morphine was the most frequently taken drug that caused ADEs (48.39).

Conclusions Using naloxone as a trigger tool helps to increase the total number of identifi ed opioids-related ADEs. Most of these ADEs were classi fi ed as preventable ADEs. Preventable ADEs most often occurred during the prescribing phase.

References

1. NCC MERP Index for Categorizing Medication Errors. The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention [online]. 2015. [cited 2017 January 23]. Available from: URL: http://www.nccmerp.org/sites/default/files/nccmerp_fact_sheet_2015-02-v91.pdf
2. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Cooper J, Demonaco HJ, Gallivan T, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA. 1995;274:35–43.
3. ปราโมทย์ ตระกูลเพียรกิจ. เครื่องมือส่งสัญญาณสำหรับการเพิ่มความสามารถในการวัดและป้องกันอันตรายที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการใช้ยา. ใน : บุษบา จินดาวิจักษณ์, ธนรัตน์ สรวลเสน่ห์, สุวัฒนา จุฬาวัฒนทล, ปรีชา มนทกานติกุล, บรรณาธิการ. Advances in pharmaceutics and pharmacy practice. กรุงเทพมหานคร: บริษัทประชาชน จำกัด; 2554. หน้า 184-96.
4. Silverman JB, Stapinski CD, Churchill WW. Multifaceted approach to reducing preventable adverse drug events. Am. J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60;582-6.
5. Levinson DR. Adverse events in hospitals: national incidence among Medicare beneficiaries. US Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General. November 2010. [cited 2017 January 19] . Available from: URL: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-06-09-00090.pdf
6. Griffin FA, Resar RK. IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events (Second Edition). IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2009.
7. Meyer-Massetti C, Cheng CM, Schwappach DL, Paulsen L, Ide B, Meier CR, et al. Systematic review of medication safety assessment methods. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011;68: 227-40.
8. Resar R, Rozich JD, Classen D. Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12:ii39-45.
9. Rozich J, Haraden C, Resar R. Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:194–200.
10. Asavaroengchai S, Sriratanaban J, Hiransuthikul N, Supachutikul A. Identifying adverse events in hospitalized patients using global trigger tool in Thailand. Asian Biomed 2009; 3:545–50.
11. จันทิมา โยธาพิทักษ์, รุ่งนภา ทรงศิริพงษ์. การใช้ Trigger tool ในการค้นหาเหตุการณ์ไม่พึงประสงค์จากการใช้ยา. ใน: ธนรัตน์ สรวลเสน่ห์, บุษบา จินดาวิจักษณ์, บรรณาธิการ. ก้าวสำคัญสู่ความเป็นวิชาชีพ: เภสัชกรโรงพยาบาล. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สมาคมเภสัช-
กรรมโรงพยาบาล (ประเทศไทย); 2552. หน้า 140-54.
12. ปริทัศน์ สุขสนาน. กรณีศึกษาการใช้ยาเคเอ็กซาเลตเป็นตัวบ่งชี้ภาวะโปแตสเซียมสูงในเลือดสูงในผู้ป่วยที่เข้ารับการรักษาในโรงพยาบาล. (บทคัดย่อผลงานวิชาการที่นำเสนอบนเวที). ใน: ธนรัตน์ สรวลเสน่ห์, บุษบา จินดาวิจักษณ์, บรรณาธิการ. ก้าวสำคัญสู่ความ
เป็นวิชาชีพ: เภสัชกรโรงพยาบาล. กรุงเทพ-มหานคร: สมาคมเภสัชกรรมโรงพยาบาล (ประเทศไทย); 2552. หน้า 239.
13. น่ารัก ยี่สุ่นแป้น, ปราโมทย์ ตระกูลเพียรกิจ, วรรณี กีรติเตชากร, ทิฆัมพร เอื้อวิเศษวงศ์, ธิดา นิงสานนท์, อุษา ฉายเกล็ดแก้ว, และคณะ. การค้นหาเหตุการณ์ไม่พึงประสงค์จากการใช้ยาโดยใช้เครื่องมือส่งสัญญาณของโรงพยาบาลประจำจังหวัดในประเทศไทย. วารสารเภสัชกรรมไทย. 2558;2:234-49.
14. Macario A, Pergolizzi JV. Pain and nausea management after surgery. Int J Pain Med Pall Care. 2004;3:91-100.
15. Sydow M, Neumann P. Sedation for the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:634-6.
16. Meisenberg B, Ness J, Rao S, Rhule J, Ley C. Implementation of solutions to reduce opioid-induced oversedation and respiratory depression. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2016;73: e679-86.
17. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30:239-45.
18. National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. Contemporary View of Medication– Related Harm. A New Paradigm [online]. [cited 2017 January 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.nccmerp.org/sites/default/files/nccmerp_fact_sheet_2015-02-v91.pdf.
19. Brenner S, Detz A, López A, Horton C, Sarkar U.Signal and noise: applying a laboratory trigger tool to identify adverse drug events among primary care patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:670-5.
20. Eckstrand JA, Habib AS, Williamson A, Horvath MM, Gattis KG, Cozart H, et al. Computerized surveillance of opioid-related adverse drug events in perioperative care: A cross-sectional study. Patient Safety in Surgery. 2009;3:18.
21. Neil K, Marcil A, Kosar L,Dumont Z, Ruda L, McMillan K. Retrospective analysis of opioid medication incidents requiring administration of naloxone. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2013;66: 280–8.
22. Jarzyna D, Jungguist CR, Pasero C, Willens JS, Nisbet A, Oakes L, et al. American Society for Pain Management Nursing guidelines on monitoring for opioid-induced sedation and respiratory depression. Pain Manag Nurs. 2011;12: 118-145.e10.
23. Joint Commission. Safe use of opioids in hospitals. The Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert. 2012;49:1-5.
24. Herzig SJ, Rothberg MB, Cheung M, Ngo LH, Marcantonio ER. Opioid utilization and opioid-related adverse events in nonsurgical patients in US hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2014;9: 73-81.
25. Jungquist CR, Willens JS, Dunwoody DR, Klingman KJ, Polomano RC. Monitoring for opioid-induced advancing sedation and respiratory depression: ASPMN membership survey of current practice. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014;15:682-93.
26. Pasero C. Assessment of sedation during opioid administration for pain management. J Perianesth Nurs. 2009;24:186-90.
27. Sessler CN, Gosnell M, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O’Neal PV, Keane KA, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1338-44.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Phithakham C, Kritsadathan T, Tiyaprasertkul W, Phothikun R. To identify and characterize an opioids-related adverse drug event (ADE) using naloxone as a trigger tool and to determine the causes of preventable ADEs. BSCM [Internet]. 2018 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 23];57(1):49-60. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMMJ-MedCMJ/article/view/99387

Issue

Section

Original Article