เชียงใหม่เวชสาร or Chiang Mai Medical Journal (CMMJ) (Formerly Chiang Mai Medical Bulletin) is an open access and official journal of Chiang Mai University Faculty of Medicine.

Focus and scope

CMMJ accepts original papers on clinical and experimental research that are pertinent in the health sciences. Original articles, short communications, case reports, review articles, letters to the Editor, and miscellany are welcome.

Peer review process

CMMJ operates a double-blind review process. Authors may suggest peer-reviewers, which the editor may or may not use. All submitted articles will be initially assessed by the editor for suitability for the journal. Each article deemed suitable is then sent to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess its scientific quality. Reviewers submit their reports to the editor using the online system. The Editor makes the final decision and informs such decision to the authors. Publication

Publication Frequency

CMMJ is published 4 issues/year (i.e., Mar, Jun, Sep, and Dec).

Open Access Policy

Materials in CMMJ are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License. Users are free to share and adapt these materials provided they give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license appropriate credit, and indicate if changes were made. However, without written permission from CMMJ, users may not use the materials for commercial purposes. (Following publication, CMMJ reserves the copyright of all published materials and such materials may not be reproduced in any form without written permission from CMMJ.)

Policies on Publication Ethics

 CMMJ strictly follows the recommendations issued by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). The CMMJ Policies on Publication Ethics are mainly drawn from the following documents:

  1. ‘Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals: Updated December 2017’ issued by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; AND
  2. ‘Responsible research publication: international standards for editors’: a position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010.
  3. ‘Responsible research publication: international standards for authors’: a position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010.

A selection of important points summarized from the above-mentioned documents is included below. If there is any question, concern, or dispute on this matter, all parties should refer to and comply with the latest recommendations stated in the three primary sources.

Editors’ role and responsibility 

  • CMMJ Editors must maintain their accountability and take responsibility for everything published in Chiang Mai Medical Journal
  • CMMJ Editors must not share information about manuscripts, including whether they have been received and are under review, their content and status in the review process, criticism by reviewers, and their ultimate fate, to anyone other than the authors and reviewers.
  • CMMJ Editors must make fair and unbiased decisions independent from commercial consid-eration and ensure a fair and appropriate peer review process.
  • CMMJ Editors must encourage maximum transparency and complete, honest reporting.
  • CMMJ Editors must guard the integrity of the published record by issuing corrections and retractions when needed and pursuing suspected or alleged research and publication misconduct.
  • CMMJ Editors must pursue peer reviewer and editorial misconduct.
  • CMMJ Editors must critically assess the ethical conduct of studies in humans and animals.
  • CMMJ Editors must inform peer reviewers and authors about what is expected of them.
  • CMMJ Editors who make final decisions about manuscripts must recuse themselves from editorial decisions if they have conflicts of interest or relationships that pose potential conflicts related to articles under consideration.

Authors’ role and responsibility 

  • An author must meet all four of the following criteria:

                i)  Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND

               ii) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND  iii)  Final approval of the version to be published; AND

              iv)  Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.      

  • The articles being submitted must have been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner and must comply with all relevant legislation.
  • Authors must present their submitted articles clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation.
  • Authors must strive to describe their methods clearly and unambiguously so that their findings can be confirmed by others.
  • Authors must adhere to publication requirements that submitted articles are original, are not plagiarized, and have not been published elsewhere.
  • Authors must take collective responsibility for submitted and published articles.
  • The authorship of submitted articles must accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting.
  • Funding sources and relevant conflicts of interest must be disclosed in the sections of ‘Acknowledgments’ and ‘Conflicts of Interest’, respectively.

Peer Reviewers’ Role and Responsibility

  • Peer reviewers must keep manuscripts and the information they contain strictly confidential.
  • Peer reviewers must not publicly discuss authors’ work and must not appropriate authors’ ideas before the manuscript is published.
  • Peer reviewers must not retain the manuscript for their personal use and should destroy copies of manuscripts after submitting their reviews.
  • Peer reviewers are expected to respond promptly to requests to review and to submit reviews within the time agreed.
  • Peer reviewers’ comments should be constructive, honest, and polite.
  • Peer reviewers should declare their conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from the peer-review process if a conflict exists.

Contact address

     Chiang Mai Medical Journal Office,

     Chiang Mai University Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai 50200, Th ailand.

     Telephone: +66-53-935270; Fax: +66-53-936234

     E-mail: cmmj@cmu.ac.th