Automated Immunohistochemistry as an Alternative to Conventional Immunohistochemistry for Analyzing the Expression of BCL2 and Ki-67 in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients
Keywords:
conventional immunohistochemistry, automated immu- nohistochemistry, BCL2 expression, Ki-67 expression, diffuse large B-cell lymphomaAbstract
Objective Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely used to assess prognostic markers such as BCL2 and Ki-67. Conventional IHC relies on manual staining and visual estimation by pathologists, while automated IHC incorporates computer-based image analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the level of agreement between these two IHC workflows in assessing BCL2 and Ki-67 expression in DLBCL patients.
Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from nodal and extranodal sites of 42 and 60 DLBCL cases were analyzed for BCL2 and Ki-67, respectively. Conventional IHC involved manual staining and evaluation by a pathologist in 10.00% increments. Automated IHC used the Ventana BenchMark ULTRA system with digital image analysis. Expression levels of the two systems were compared using paired t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Pearson’s correlation, and Bland–Altman plots.
Results For BCL2, no significant difference was found between the two methods (mean difference = 5.79%, p = 0.103), with moderate to good agreement (ICC = 0.739) and strong correlation (r = 0.772). For Ki-67, patho-logist-based assessment yielded significantly higher values (mean difference = 13.91%, p < 0.001), with moderate agreement (ICC = 0.569) and strong correlation (r = 0.688). Bland–Altman analysis confirmed acceptable limits of agreement, although a slight underestimation in the automated Ki-67 results was observed.
Conclusions Automated IHC showed moderate to good agreement with conventional IHC, particularly for BCL2. Despite some differences in Ki-67 quantification, both methods demonstrated consistent trends. Auto-mated IHC offers reproducibility and scalability, making it a promising complementary tool in pathology.
References
de Leval L, Hasserjian RP. Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and burkitt lymphoma. Hematol Oncology Clin of North Am. 2009;23:791-827.
Leich E, Hartmann EM, Burek C, Ott G, Rosenwald A. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of gene expression profiling in lymphomas. APMIS. 2007;115: 1135-46.
Kim K, Jorge VM, Tiu A, Mousaa P, Gupta S, Djibo D, et al. Early Mortality after Diagnosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma : A Retrospective, Single Urban-Community Hospital Study. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):5335.
Klanova M, Kazantsev D, Pokorna E, Zikmund T, Karolova J, Behounek M, et al. Anti-apoptotic MCL1 protein represents critical survival molecule for most burkitt lymphomas and BCL2-negative diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Mol Cancer Ther. 2022;21:89-99.
Roh J, Cho H, Pak H-K, Lee YS, Lee S-w, Ryu J-S, et al. BCL2 super-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a distinct subgroup associated with poor prognosis. Mod Pathol. 2022;35:480-8.
Punnoose E, Peale FV, Szafer-Glusman E, Lei G, Bourgon R, Do AD, et al. BCL2 Expression in first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies a patient population with poor prognosis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021;21:267-78:e10.
Harlendea NJ, Harlendo K. Ki-67 as a Marker to Differentiate Burkitt Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2022;16: e72190. PubMed PMID: 39583511
Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000;182:311-22.
Sadeghipour A, Taha SR, Shariat Zadeh M, Kosari F, Babaheidarian P, Fattahi F, et al. Expression and Clinical Significance of Ki-67, CD10, BCL6, MUM1, c-MYC, and EBV in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Patients. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2024;32:309-21.
Broyde A, Boycov O, Strenov Y, Okon E, Shpilberg O, Bairey O. Role and prognostic significance of the Ki-67 index in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:338-43.
Tang YL, Zhou Y, Cheng LL, Su YZ, Wang CB. BCL2/Ki-67 index predict survival in germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncol Lett. 2017; 14:3767-73.
Yimpak P, Bumroongkit K, Tantiworawit A, Rattanathammethee T, Aungsuchawan S, Daroontum T. Immunohistochemistry-based investigation of MYC, BCL2, and Ki-67 protein expression and their clinical impact in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in upper Northern Thailand. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0307253. PubMed PMID: 39038016.
Chabot-Richards DS, Martin DR, Myers OB, Czuchlewski DR, Hunt KE. Quantitative image analysis in the assessment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:1598-605.
Li LT, Jiang G, Chen Q, Zheng JN. Ki67 is a promising molecular target in the diagnosis of cancer (review). Mol Med Rep. 2015;11:1566-72.
González-González R, Molina-Frechero N, Carreón-Burciaga RG, López-Verdín S, Robles-Bonilla C, Pereira-Prado V, et al. Comparison between Manual and Automated Methods for Ki-67 Immunoexpression Quantification in Ameloblastomas. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2016;2016:7486989. PubMed PMID: 27843757
Remes SM, Tuominen VJ, Helin H, Isola J, Arola J. Grading of neuroendocrine tumors with Ki-67 requires high-quality assessment practices. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1359-63.





