Automated Immunohistochemistry as an Alternative to Conventional Immunohistochemistry for Analyzing the Expression of BCL2 and Ki-67 in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients

Authors

Keywords:

conventional immunohistochemistry, automated immu- nohistochemistry, BCL2 expression, Ki-67 expression, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Abstract

Objective  Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely used to assess prognostic markers such as BCL2 and Ki-67. Conventional IHC relies on manual staining and visual estimation by pathologists, while automated IHC incorporates computer-based image analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the level of agreement between these two IHC workflows in assessing BCL2 and Ki-67 expression in DLBCL patients.

Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from nodal and extranodal sites of 42 and 60 DLBCL cases were analyzed for BCL2 and Ki-67, respectively. Conventional IHC involved manual staining and evaluation by a pathologist in 10.00% increments. Automated IHC used the Ventana BenchMark ULTRA system with digital image analysis. Expression levels of the two systems were compared using paired t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Pearson’s correlation, and Bland–Altman plots.

Results For BCL2, no significant difference was found between the two methods (mean difference = 5.79%, p = 0.103), with moderate to good agreement (ICC = 0.739) and strong correlation (r = 0.772).  For Ki-67, patho-logist-based assessment yielded significantly higher values (mean difference = 13.91%, p < 0.001), with moderate agreement (ICC = 0.569) and strong correlation (r = 0.688). Bland–Altman analysis confirmed acceptable limits of agreement, although a slight underestimation in the automated Ki-67 results was observed.

Conclusions Automated IHC showed moderate to good agreement with conventional IHC, particularly for BCL2. Despite some differences in Ki-67 quantification, both methods demonstrated consistent trends. Auto-mated IHC offers reproducibility and scalability, making it a promising complementary tool in pathology. 

References

de Leval L, Hasserjian RP. Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and burkitt lymphoma. Hematol Oncology Clin of North Am. 2009;23:791-827.

Leich E, Hartmann EM, Burek C, Ott G, Rosenwald A. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of gene expression profiling in lymphomas. APMIS. 2007;115: 1135-46.

Kim K, Jorge VM, Tiu A, Mousaa P, Gupta S, Djibo D, et al. Early Mortality after Diagnosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma : A Retrospective, Single Urban-Community Hospital Study. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):5335.

Klanova M, Kazantsev D, Pokorna E, Zikmund T, Karolova J, Behounek M, et al. Anti-apoptotic MCL1 protein represents critical survival molecule for most burkitt lymphomas and BCL2-negative diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Mol Cancer Ther. 2022;21:89-99.

Roh J, Cho H, Pak H-K, Lee YS, Lee S-w, Ryu J-S, et al. BCL2 super-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a distinct subgroup associated with poor prognosis. Mod Pathol. 2022;35:480-8.

Punnoose E, Peale FV, Szafer-Glusman E, Lei G, Bourgon R, Do AD, et al. BCL2 Expression in first-line diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies a patient population with poor prognosis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021;21:267-78:e10.

Harlendea NJ, Harlendo K. Ki-67 as a Marker to Differentiate Burkitt Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2022;16: e72190. PubMed PMID: 39583511

Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000;182:311-22.

Sadeghipour A, Taha SR, Shariat Zadeh M, Kosari F, Babaheidarian P, Fattahi F, et al. Expression and Clinical Significance of Ki-67, CD10, BCL6, MUM1, c-MYC, and EBV in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Patients. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2024;32:309-21.

Broyde A, Boycov O, Strenov Y, Okon E, Shpilberg O, Bairey O. Role and prognostic significance of the Ki-67 index in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:338-43.

Tang YL, Zhou Y, Cheng LL, Su YZ, Wang CB. BCL2/Ki-67 index predict survival in germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncol Lett. 2017; 14:3767-73.

Yimpak P, Bumroongkit K, Tantiworawit A, Rattanathammethee T, Aungsuchawan S, Daroontum T. Immunohistochemistry-based investigation of MYC, BCL2, and Ki-67 protein expression and their clinical impact in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in upper Northern Thailand. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0307253. PubMed PMID: 39038016.

Chabot-Richards DS, Martin DR, Myers OB, Czuchlewski DR, Hunt KE. Quantitative image analysis in the assessment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:1598-605.

Li LT, Jiang G, Chen Q, Zheng JN. Ki67 is a promising molecular target in the diagnosis of cancer (review). Mol Med Rep. 2015;11:1566-72.

González-González R, Molina-Frechero N, Carreón-Burciaga RG, López-Verdín S, Robles-Bonilla C, Pereira-Prado V, et al. Comparison between Manual and Automated Methods for Ki-67 Immunoexpression Quantification in Ameloblastomas. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2016;2016:7486989. PubMed PMID: 27843757

Remes SM, Tuominen VJ, Helin H, Isola J, Arola J. Grading of neuroendocrine tumors with Ki-67 requires high-quality assessment practices. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1359-63.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-27

How to Cite

1.
Yimpak P, Bumroongkit K, Tantiworawit A, Rattanathammethee T, Aungsuchawan S, Daroontum T. Automated Immunohistochemistry as an Alternative to Conventional Immunohistochemistry for Analyzing the Expression of BCL2 and Ki-67 in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients. BSCM [internet]. 2025 Nov. 27 [cited 2026 Jan. 11];65(1):43-50. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMMJ-MedCMJ/article/view/276123

Issue

Section

Original Article